this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
600 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

58593 readers
4023 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don't like the idea of AI giving me "facts" since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I prefer DDG, but I hate the news search. 90% of the results are paywalled.

Oh, and sometimes the image search will return a pile of porn for a seemingly clean search request. I once searched for "R34 Skyline" expecting Nissans, and got VERY different results without safe search.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 2 days ago

Searching for R34 is on you. Naming something R34 is on Nissan. The popularity of R34 is on all of us.

[–] ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

R34 is also short for rule 34 - "if it exists, there's porn of it on the internet"

So if you search R34 and anything, you'll get porn.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Now I want to see some skyline porn

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] mPony@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

according to Architecture Today, that structure is sexual in nature.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 9 points 2 days ago

Thanks for making me feel inadequate...

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Drake might have the Six, but I have the Eight, if you know what I mean

I mean my dicker

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I was very worried about zooming in on this expecting something bad. My innocence is lost… wait no I never had any. My bad.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

News orgs clinging to tradition.

i use archive.is for anything I really want to read.

most news is fluffy bullshit anyway.

[–] zante@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 days ago

Agree. It’s an important part of media literacy these days.

For political news, I’m only interested in what was actually said, not what is reported to be said .

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's just that Bing/DDG seem to promote news from these sites as if they're sponsored links... but without the disclosure.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

I'm pretty sure here in the states, a site is obligated to identify ad content and sponsored content, so when a big company like Microsoft or Alphabet is doing it (Bing and Google) it makes me wonder if there's been a recent carve-out or relaxation of the reg.

That makes the return adversarial to the end-user, hence the point of the regulations.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

bummer.

I see all the labeled sponsored links on Bing, but I generally get high quality results outside of those.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

Every search engine I've encountered is weird about porn. At first it decides whether or not you're looking for porn or not looking for porn. If it assumes you are then all the actual porn hits are promoted to the top, where non-porn hits are down-ranked. Vice versa, if it decides you're not looking for porn.

Once of the fun search engine games is to find out what sets of ambiguous words trigger the porn flag. Pure tended to be one due to a brand name, even when I was looking for pure minerals at the time. Siri created some conflicts, since there's both a well known LLM digital assistant, rule 34 for the same and a popular porn star.

I'd really like a search engine that let porn sites fall in the hit list without deciding first whether I was trying to look for porn, since I sometimes do metasearching.