this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
1538 points (98.3% liked)

solarpunk memes

2659 readers
562 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreeNRG@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need to re-think our relationship with property.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"‘When you reap the harvest of your land, do not reap to the very edges of your field or gather the gleanings of your harvest. Do not go over your vineyard a second time or pick up the grapes that have fallen. Leave them for the poor and the foreigner. I am the Lord your God." - Leviticus 19:9, 10

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Leviticus Its in the pick and choose portion of the king james opinion of the bible.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 0 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Yeah, you don't use the 5e handbook as your character sheet, just like you don't use the Bible as your moral code.

You get to not play as a charitable and kind Christian if you don't want to, you can just as well play a greedy and mean subclass.

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Well it is "the Rules of the Tribe of Levi" canonically speaking they are laws made not by God but by a bunch of priests. It is important for biblical historical context reasons but technically speaking these are ancient society laws. It's why instructional portions detailing animal sacrifice are included in that section when modern Christians tend to look at animal sacrifice as a satanic cult kind of thing.

Provided you are Christian ( before the atheists start in, I'm not - I just study the religion as a part of gaining historical background info) Using Leviticus to justify one's opinions on anything strikes me as showing that one read the text absent the scholarly context. A lot of Christians do this because book annotations wouldn't be a thing before 1000 AD and it really benefited a lot of powerful people to never mention context of the compiling process of the book because once the supposed less than divine fingerprints on the processed material are brought to light it weakens it's power as a tool of authority.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think something like this would be carried over into the new covenant as the spirit of the law remained

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Except they don't do that. What they do is pick and choose from the old testament and ignore any part of the new testament that is inconvenient. Not all of them. Just the majority of them. What they do instead is take away the benches least someone in need to sleep there. They punish those that feed the needy in many places. They pass laws to make the most vulnerable of us criminals for daring to exist in their presence.

I don't listen to what people say. I watch what they do. What the majority of christians in my area do is hateful and very non christian. All of them are convinced though that god always wants exactly what they want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My parents are happy when people pick fruits from the trees at the street. When they fall they rot no one except the wasps and insects have something from it.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

No-good lazy workshy people stealing food from hardworking wasps 🤬🤬🤬🤬

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those same people walk on sidewalks without going through the toll booths!

(for US people, sidewalks are designated areas on the side of the road especially for pedestrians, or as some people say, wasted space)

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We call them pavements in the UK and I kinda think sidewalk is more descriptive. You walk on the side of the road.

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In the US basically anything paved is pavement.

Asphalt road: Pavement

Concrete sidewalk: Pavement

Giant parking lot: Pavement

Gravel road: Believe it or not - paveme.. well that one's debatable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hangonasecond@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Down under, it's usually footpath which I think is even more descriptive

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 16 hours ago

Footpath is also the more popular term in the UK IMO

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Footpath makes it sound like it goes through the woods or a field or something.

[–] HydraulicMonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It can do. But your feet do work outside of woods and fields too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I actually really appreciate the rational response to this that people have had about waste fruit, the rotting, and the food chain that follows the fallen fruit.

I had wanted to plant a few fruit trees in my front yard and allow neighbors to just take fruit off of it. Lots of people walk up my 0.5mi dead-end road.

But then I remembered what every PYO farm is like...tons of rotting fruits sitting at the bottom of all of them. And any apple someone picks that isn't 100% perfect gets tossed in the pile.

That's a lot of maintenance. Totally doable for an individual or small group to maintain a small patch. Gets really difficult to scale up.

It's worth keeping in mind though, if you want to feed people: we can just do that, we have the food and we have the infrastructure. Every person going hungry in a city with edible food in bins, produce discarded for not looking right and so on is going hungry because of policy decisions.

It is cheaper, healthier, and more successful to just distribute the food we already grow, make and transport than trying to turn everything into an orchid.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not terrible, but it's also not great. Fruit trees by their nature produce just mountains of fruit for a single tree. I came from a large farming family and we had a few fruit trees. So much of it ends up on the ground and rotting (which, not so bad since it was in a field, a nightmare if it were in the suburbs).

If you really want one, you NEED to maintain the tree. That means cutting branches to make sure the tree doesn't grow up and instead grows out. It also means constant maintenance to make sure branches aren't overloaded (growing out means they have a higher risk of breaking).

Regular trees are already a PITA to take properly maintain, fruit trees are another level.

And even with all that, you'll still end up with a bunch of rotting fruit on the ground. Birds, insects, etc will nibble at your fruits. You'll simply miss the 50 fruit the ripened early or late. It's just going to be a headache no matter what you do.

And it's a lot of fruit. 1 tree can easily make enough fruit for 20 people. That comes in all at once.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 188 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This sounded plausible until she said they poured bleach on the ground. Then it had the smell of bullshit.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wait, why? Bleach is a common way to kill plants in the short term without any long term lingering effects in the soil since it decomposes into salt and water. With enough drainage, the salt seeps out and plants can grow again. I'd say it's a pretty pragmatic solution to ensuring that someone doesn't grow anything again in the short term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iapar 15 points 1 day ago

People drink bleach to avoid a life saving vaccine.

In this parody of a world we live in I say it is not so far fetched someone would do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (7 children)

In my city, olive trees thrive like mad. I could probably start a business selling a few tons of brined and jarred olives a year entirely on free produce.

Lemons, too. I could go for a 15 minute walk in any random neighbourhood and come back with 10 pounds of lemons.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago

Lemon stealing whore.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I live in Canberra, Australia and we also have an excellent climate for olives and lemons. Apples and practically all citrus also do well and plums and other stone fruit grow like topsi. Figs too.

Deep inland, 600m elevation

We need to protect many of our fruit trees from birds, but not olives, apples, or citrus

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 1 points 22 hours ago

Unfortunately, we have bears around my parts. And bears like the fruit too, driving human bear conflict. Which means the bears are killed. 🐻 :(

[–] sketelon@eviltoast.org 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I can't recall the source, but I remember hearing that the Amazon, generations ago, was farmed. The trees aren't distributed naturally, or something like that, we see signs of intentional crop management. However, it was done in a symbiotic way with nature so that it almost looks natural, until you look closer. With lots of fruit trees and food sources so that food was an abundant free resource.

Wish I could remember the source for this, sounds like heaven on earth, working with nature is all we need to rediscover freedom.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're thinking about indigenous groups that farmed parts of the Amazon. You want a rabbit hole? Google Terra preta. See you in a few years ;)

[–] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You got me going down the rabbit hole at work now. Very fascinating stuff. It's incredible the things that our ancestors knew about nature that have been lost to time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The town I grew up in had several public apple trees. I have fond memories of climbing the trees with my friends to get apples.

Maintenance is a thing, though. If not properly maintained, the apples will often grow too densely, yielding only small and sour apples. I would never consider the apples in my home town to be filling food - at best it would be a small snack. It would require a lot of labour to maintain a tree to the point where it would feed people in need.

[–] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Public trees already have a maintenance schedule and budget, public fruit trees don't need to be about filling hungry people, they're just as much about finding small moments of joy in your community.

Also trees that bear fruit usually don't produce as much pollen in spring so it would cut down on hayfever, they do drop more seed which can be messier if planted along sidewalks. That's the main reason decorative public trees are often male, 40 years ago civic planners decided pollen was easier to deal with than seed drop.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago (7 children)

You just know some asshole would pick all the trees clean and go sell the fruit

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 46 points 2 days ago (4 children)

No offense to you personally, but I hate this kind of premature defeatism. Like... yeah, some people are jerks and try to take advantage of things. Put rules in place and enforce them as much as the people in charge care to.

I know it's strawmanning to bring this up, but people use the same argument to say "We shouldn't have food stamps for hungry kids or welfare for needy families or subsidized housing for people without homes because people will abuse it. Yeah. Some people will, and others will suffer because of their greed. But so many more people will continue to suffer if we don't even try because we are too scared of The Undeserving boogeyman. Not every tree will be taken advantage of, and as the sense of outreach and community grows, abuse of it will fall and it will be worth it. I guarantee it...

I hate this kind of premature defeatism

This is what "the tragedy of the commons" was all about in pre-Victorian England. Rich people decried the existence of land held and used by all the people of a community, claiming that it couldn't work in practice because eventually some asshole would always take it all for themselves. Turns out they were the some asshole, seizing all the commons for themselves as private property (a process known as "enclosure"), ending many centuries of actually successful common usage of land.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

Plant enough so they can't make a profit.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Visit Portland. Lots of neighborhoods grow fruit trees.

And the fruit falls to the ground.

Nobody is going around selling them.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 104 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Same comments I got when I said I was planting apple trees in my front yard. Those are for the public, the ones in my back yard are for me.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't believe this conversation actually occurred. Why would anyone care about a fruit tree being picked?

I believe it happened I’ve had many insane conversations with people like this.

Like food banks and people will say well what if people that don’t need it go there. I’m like so what, if 1 in a 1000 abuses a system it doesn’t mean we should make the 999 suffer by removing it.

[–] Clasm@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 day ago

I only care when a single individual or group picks all of the fruit from the public trees just so that they can sell it down the road and profit from it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just a bafflingly dumb response to such an obviously great thing to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] coffee_with_cream@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I put on a vest and plant clones of apple trees in public parks

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›