dQw4w9WgXcQ

joined 11 months ago
[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

I still haven't found Waldo

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We have found that the best way to store bread to maintain the nice texture and consistency is to leave it on a wooden board with the sliced side downwards. The crust seems to protect the inner part well without turning the bread too moist.

Seems counterintuitive, but just leaving it like that on the counter lets the bread stay nice for more than a week.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago

Jars of stuff which expired years or even decades ago. They still do.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 11 points 5 days ago

So it protects official acts without actually specifying what an official act is. If incitement of insurrection is an official act, it seems like the definition is quite broad.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 57 points 5 days ago (6 children)

That sounds both crazy and not actually wildly far fetched. If the tables were turned and Trump was in the position of having the power to declare Biden's movement as an enemy and carry out violent ways to stop them, I would almost expect it to happen.

 

If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don't see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.

I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don't want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it's actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.

What am I missing?

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just to make sure to not take sides, I pronounce the 'g' as in 'design'

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

"Only at least 15%"

As in one could expect the study to yield a higher low bound.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

If she didn't bring a rotisserie chicken, that hat is definitely too big. But if she thought of bringing one, her brain is so large that it wouldn't leave any room for the chicken.

That hat is a real Catch 22.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I still subscribe to the theory that these people are hired actors from Big Oil. They are experts at being unlikable and naturally pushes me towards the opposing side. It sucks.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Look at something written 500 years ago. 100 years ago. 50 years ago. Language changes all the time, and there is no stopping that. Yep, language is an endless cycle of switching out common words and adapting to social rules. I'd highly reccommend to follow that flow instead of trying to bring back the "good old days" when n-words and r-words were common and accepted.

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't get the obsession with reintroducing negatively charged words into the common language. Isn't english a rich enough language that there's an abundance of substitutes for words?

view more: next ›