this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
261 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like... No shit?

Meat industry makes tons of money.

Activist groups and scientists don't.

How are the poor supposed to spend more than the mega rich on anything?

[–] beansbeansbeans@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Save the animals, eat the rich.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago

For anyone interested in supporting those going up against the meat lobby, look into the Agriculture Fairness Aliance

https://www.agriculturefairnessalliance.org/about/mission

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

It's not working and they have cause for concern. Mean consumption is on a downward trend

Edit: I meant to say in the United States it's slowing down.

[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

which is why they are spending so much. it's a good sign in some ways.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

I love eating beef and whatnot, but my body seems to respond better to eating less of that in a given sitting. As someone growing up in the 80s, it seemed like that diet should be a 50/50 mix of beef and spinach...

I think they are going to have a hard time convincing people to feel crummier... it's much healthier and cheaper to stick to that old "pack of playing card portion"

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Mean consumption is on a downward trend

can you show me some evidence of this?

[–] alucard@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I would love to see this too!!

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, I meant to say it's slowing down, not trending down as I wrote originally. Most stats show this trend.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This article goes into some detail. However it is focused on the US market.

Meat and pets

European markets are a little different.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

I imagine asian markets dwarf America and europe

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, I don't think that's true. Here's some US data I found with one quick search.

To add to that, as underdeveloped areas become more modern and income levels increase, it tends to follow that meat consumption increases along with it.

I would be very happy to be proven wrong on this.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I imagine costs would be the main thing driving down consumption if anything. Until we subsidize alternatives like we do meat, and the prices of meat alternatives are cheaper, people will have incentives to eat real meat.

It would cost us less to subsidize them long term, and it would lower costs of meat... And help the environment. Wins all around, yet people will vote blindly against it.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Sorry, I meant to say it's slowing down, not trending down as I wrote originally. Most stats show this trend.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It also explains why Big Dairy was trying to make almond milk be labeled "nut juice" and protect the term "milk".

I really do think the SAD will be one of the last things to fall in our path toward progression - and that's assuming we steadily progress. Seeing donnie and his supporters doesn't exactly lead me to believe that about ~30% of this country wants any progress. The reactionaries have been doing nearly all they can to deride, mock and hold back any and all forms of reduction of our ridiculous levels of consumption of dairy and dead flesh for years and years. I even still run into some of them that think being a (male) vegetarian will turn you into a woman or something, because "protein", LOL.

There is a lot of propaganda to overcome on the path to getting Americans to eat a properly healthy diet AND to curb the massive global warming from their current diet already - and dumb fad diets like eating all-steak like Peterson or the "paleo" diet are not helping at all.

[–] wsheldon@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

They're the only one of these groups that's selling something. That probably helps.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

There are 5 companies that own meat producing in the US, which is the real problem.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why does meat need lobbying? Most people already consider it essential and like the taste.

It’s like lobbying for sugar…

Wait a minute…

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

When it comes to progress, the SAD will be one of the last things to fall, IMHO.

Even swapping out the same thing by creating clean meat has the anti-woke warriors all aflame and clutching their pearls about how they'll all turn into "soy boys" if they aren't killing something in order to "get their protein"...imagine going full plant-based, my word.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

The Meat Lobby would a good band name.

[–] hakase@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

As far as I'm concerned they're preaching to the choir.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They don't need to spend money to convince people that meat is delicious - I wonder what all that money goes to.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Anyone have a look behind the paywall?

load more comments
view more: next ›