this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
126 points (95.7% liked)

science

14848 readers
949 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

as far as crash-landings go, this was freakin beautiful

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It was positioned well for the failure but I'm not a fan of the dramatic circling drone shot. It gives you no concept of size, scale or altitude of ... anything. The static camera positions we get from spacex are way better.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Lol I cracked up when it happened. The fuckin title had me expecting hiroshima/nagasaki 2.0 then it just flops down like a toddler learning to go from standing position to sitting on floor position😂

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

that was some impressive drone footage. beautiful

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pretty impressive engineering regardless. I suspect they’ll have it figured out in no time. Reusable rockets owned by China will be a huge blow for American aerospace.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The drone works was really nice. Pretty cool video and always nice to see companies publishing their failures aswell.

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, looked like someone flying acro, not an auto pilot. That would be a fun flight.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The engine cut was so sudden. I was honestly expecting a more dramatic failure, but still awesome to see reusable rockets steadily becoming the norm.

[–] walter_wiggles@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More dramatic?! There was music and everything...

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Dramatic like a fireball rising up from the crash, not the drama created by the camera and music.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Might have been an uncommanded/incorrectly-commanded engine shutdown, or some sort of sensor issue or control system integration bug

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Article says incorrect altitude measurement caused premature engine cutoff.

Reading the article before posting?

Believe it or not, straight to jail.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People tend to prefer context in science communities.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, still. Title says video.

[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

God dammit Jeb. I told you we needed moar boosters

Scott, stop abusing Jeb. He's people too.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That photo looks like CGI.

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

This is expensive cgi, it screams it. Not quite sure why they made it but someone needs to be convinced of something for sure.

(Just compare it to any footage of SpaceX landings, this video is far to clean, the sky alone is "perfect")

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

the sky alone is "perfect"

Which the sky of a desert pretty often is?

[–] Thadrax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Overly dramatic I'd say. I would have liked less movement of the drone to be able to better judge the movement of the rocket.

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They did a lot of hovering. Are they not doing a hover-slam because it's much lighter than Falcon-9?