this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
229 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2241 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 68 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why do average Americans still rate Trump as better on the economy? It’s certainly nothing rational.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Trump bizzness man, trump smart

[–] teft@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Don't insult the Pakled like that.

They are smart.

They outsmarted Captain Janeway by getting Rumdar onto the Enterprise as a spy.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago

Trump's hat is small.

[–] khan_shot_1st@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[–] GingeyBook@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Gas prices lowwwww

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

4 in 10 Americans are fucking morons.

That roughly checks out with our electoral results tbh

[–] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 63 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He doesn't understand the nuances of making policy decisions, so his default answer to stuff like this is to just impose tariffs because that's all he knows. He doesn't care to understand and would likely eat the crayons you use if you were to try to explain it to him. He's just incapable of that sort of mental growth.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 35 points 2 months ago

He doesn't understand anything. He's lived in a completely separate reality his entire life.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don't know how you can miss that, though.

Tariffs on imported goods means the price raises to cover the increased cost to import it.

Tariffs are a mechanism to encourage domestic production by making foreign competition more expensive.

It's literally the opposite of reducing the cost to consumers.

Trump has to understand this. But he knows his rabid base do not. So he says it like it's going to help consumers, rather than exclusively the domestic producers that are already overcharging.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trump has to understand this.

Who says? It seems like these days he doesn't even know which state or city he's in, I think the likelihood of him understanding literally any political theory at all is close to zero.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It's certainly possible, but I don't buy that level of ignorance.

Trump was savvy enough to keep interest rates low to heavily inflate real estate as the obvious money dump for free money. As a real estate mogul, this directly benefited him personally.

And don't give me that nieve nonsense that the president doesn't control the fed reserve. Trump's corruption was thorough and complete.

Trump absolutely understands basic economic principles of supply and demand. He is constantly trying to manipulate competition to give himself more power so he can gain from it. It's the same as raising tariffs to give domestic producers more power so they can raise their profits at the cost to the consumer.

He just doesn't give a shit about the consumer, only the kickbacks he gets from the producers.

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Honestly no, I don't think Trump understands. The way he talks about his precious tariffs, I'm pretty sure he's under the impression that imposing a tariff on Chinese goods means making China pay for it. It's really just the latest iteration of "build a wall and make Mexico pay for it."

[–] Ruorc@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You're giving him way too much credit. Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. While Trump has certainly performed acts out of malice, he is also the epitome of stupidity. He's suggested nuking hurricanes, injecting bleach, and has stared straight into the sun during a solar eclipse, etc, etc. He's a terrible person of course, but he's also a complete moron.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

I think with Trump we're forced to attribute many things to both malice and stupidity. The more he opens his mouth, the more you realize that he does have bad intentions.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Sure. He's an idiot, no argument. But I think he understands leverage, and what tariffs means to domestic leverage over their consumers because of lack of competition. But ultimately, his understanding doesn't matter, the voters understanding does. And I doubt many who are considering voting for him understand that tariffs are worst for them personally.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I’ll slap tariffs on banana imports so people buy domestically grown bananas!

I’ll slap tariffs on cocoa imports so people buy domestically grown cocoa!

[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Everybody knows that Arkansas grows the finest coffee beans in the world.

[–] CM400@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Every year, I travel the world collecting the best coffee beans I can find. I collect them and bring them back to my home in Minnesota, and use them as fuel to roast the beans I grow by myself on the roof of my building under grow lights.

[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Don't spill the beans

[–] clgoh@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if he knows the price of a banana.

[–] mxcory@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It is one banana clgoh. What could it cost. 10 dollars?

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

How much can they be clgoh, $10 dollars?

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Stable Business Genius: Let's lower prices by raising prices - checkmate liibs

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Here's his VP's plan:

"I think we are increasingly in a situation where we are going to choose between one or the other. We're going to have to get a little uncomfortable on some of these things or maybe you're going to have to be willing to pay a little bit more for certain consumer goods. We may even have to be willing to attack some of the companies financially that are waging war on the American people."

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Hey, that sounds a little bit like anti-monopoly talk, doesn't it. Crazy how price fixing might be bad for the average person.

... I don't think that's where he was going, but that's where he started.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Wouldn't it be simpler to have Mexico pay for groceries?

[–] toots@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Something belched up thoughtlessly does not count as a plan.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Does it count as a concept of a plan?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I’d quibble with calling it “deranged”. Illogical sure. Nonsense, even ridiculous, but not deranged.

His only real play has always been to define a scapegoat and stoke outrage. That’s the point here, rather than anything useful

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

No, slapping tarrifs on imported goods means they become more expensive as the tarrifs will be included in the price.

If you think that american companies that produce domestically (untariffed) will not raise their prices to maximize their profits you might have what Trump has. Plus a lot of their raw materials/components come from abroad and will also be tariffed.

Laat round of tarrifs Trump imposed led to retaliatory tarrifs by china. This hurt the US farmers so hard that most of the us tarrifs revenue went to farmers as subsidies.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Hey! USA Avocado industry would be thriving if Mexico wasn't shipping all theirs in without a tariff.

But a sable genius once said. "What we have is a thing called the gasoline. We have gasoline. We have so much gasoline, we don’t know what to do. They don’t have gasoline. So why are we making a product that they dominate? They’re going to dominate."

This was in reply to the question "How are you going to bring down the cost of food and groceries?".

I think you can apply the same logic here. "What we have is a thing called the corn. We have corn. We have so much corn, we don’t know what to do. They don’t have corn. So why are we making a product [avocados] that they dominate? They’re [Mexico] going to dominate."

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Trump is an economic idiot.

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It's bad when you are the most vocally anti regulation party, and cato goes at you.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Raw Story - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Raw Story:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.rawstory.com/deranged-experts-tear-trump-s-plan-on-grocery-prices-to-pieces/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support