this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
252 points (98.1% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3436 readers
52 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
252
Mercator v Reality (i.imgur.com)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz
 

With a human face

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

I did not realize the distance between the US and Canada was so big.

[–] halloween_spookster@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Just posted it below ha ha

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It sucks that mercator became the standard map. I know basically nothing about maps, but i know how not-great mercator is. Of the little i know about cartography I like Winkel Tripel the best

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Dln't quote me on this, but from what I've heard, the Mercador projection became standard because it's good for navigating since qit conserves angles. Draw a strait line depicting your current trajectory and another the trajectory that would get you where you want, measure the angle between them, and that's the actual angle you need to turn.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, it’s actually a really great map for its purpose of navigation, which is a pretty damn important aspect of map usage. I’m tired of everyone shitting on it because of that scene in west wing.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s great for navigating at sea, but bad for looking at the world as a whole. Nowadays most people use maps for the latter; hence the complaints.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sure, that’s why I qualified with “for its intended purpose”. It’s not a great classroom map but it is perhaps the most historically important projection. The problem is this idea of “Mercator bad” has entered public consciousness. For example, the start of this thread mentioned “how not-great the mercator is” without any such qualifications.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe one day I’ll get a Cahill-Keyes projection on the wall. I think it’s useful to see how surface areas compare.

Like this

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

because of that scene in west wing.

Which scene is that?

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

https://youtu.be/vVX-PrBRtTY?si=EJI98A0zZR6zkURc Im sure there were people who felt this way before this episode, but it really exploded in public consciousness afterward.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Internet people pretending to have never seen a globe at school so they can be outraged by Big Greenland.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In the Internet age, I believe Mercator remains standard because it's easy, since image buffers and UI viewports are implemented as rectangular arrays. For example, when you click on the map the pixel coordinates can be converted to (lat, long) just by scaling, without having to do complicated coordinate transformations.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What you see in stuff like Google Maps or OpenStreetMap isn't plain Mercator, it's a variant called "Web Mercator"

And the US DoD doesn't like it because it introduces even more deviations than plain Mercator.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's all about your intended use. If you want to use Google maps to get to work, the DoD has no problem with web Mercator on the maps backend that serves up your map tiles.

If you're firing up Arcmap for a GIS project, using the map to navigate based on earth features, or making a reference map, of course the DoD or anyone else, wouldn't want you to use web mercator

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

And no projection is perfect they all introduce weird things, like this equirectangular mapmap which is not conformal or equal area.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago
[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Winkel Tripel is very nice!

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ah, I see you're that kind of map enthusiast, eh?

Edit: I see you've already posted it yourself. Not an original bone in my body.

[–] WatTyler@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

Mercator stans will try and convince you that Russia and Canada aren't actually islands with thousands of miles of ocean isolating them from all their neighbours smh my head 😤

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[–] Gork@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I kinda like the Kavrayskiy VII projection. It's similar to the Winkel triple but it looks more natural to me, like a 2D Google Earth.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eckert IV is mine, which is quite similar visually. It has the upside of being equal-area, but the downside of squashing the poles a bit more. Sadly both of us suffer the injustice of being excluded from that one xkcd comic

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

It looks cool!

[–] Fox@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago

Unmuted this and was very disappointed that there wasn't a trombone sound

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“It’s freaking me out!”

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I think that was the upside down map

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Which is why should use the Gall-Peters projection.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

I'm more of a Kavrayskiy VII fan myself

Reference to https://xkcd.com/977/

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

USA is only about as big as europe in surface area? And russia about 1/3 bigger?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Since when is Patagonia its own country?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Islands have been done separately from the mainland when they're part of the same country on this map. Look at Canada, where Vancouver Island and Newfoundland end up far away from the rest of Canada

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Ah good call

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

imgbb.com

bandwidth limit exceeded

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Breathe in!

Another L for Russia