this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
1252 points (96.5% liked)

memes

10368 readers
2796 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 132 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Back when Obama made it where you couldn't be evicted and bailed out the auto industry, I had a friend that drove a car hauler. He wasn't paying his house payment and lived for free for a year, and only had a job because of the bailout. He talked mad shit about the bailout and about people living and not paying their rent. This is republikkklown logic. I was blown away and said to him, he wouldn't have a job or a place to live if it wasn't for that. He said he'd live somewhere else and get a different job.

Since then, he lives with his wife and child in his mom's house with a shit job and complains about people being on welfare. They don't get it.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago (4 children)

If there’s any way they can punch down instead of address their own issues they’ll take it. It’s why they resort to going after made up nonsense or the most vulnerable.

[–] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 16 points 2 months ago

Typical. Everyone else is an asshole, but me.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but he deserved that, unlike those lazy librulz.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 98 points 2 months ago (2 children)

“I’m using affordable care act! I don’t want Obamacare!”

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I literally knew a girl who said this. She truly had no idea that they were the same thing, but rattled on about wanting it gone while benefiting from it.

I also knew an older woman who hated Obama and said "he's arrogant for naming that after himself." She didn't believe me that her favorite channel was the one who named it after him unofficially and that its official name was ACA.

They truly just repeat bullshit until it sticks, and it usually works on the people who don't bother to diversify their information sources. It's so goddamn frustrating.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She didn't believe me that her favorite channel was the one who named it after him unofficially and that its official name was ACA.

That can't be true, because I've heard it called Obamacare 30 times. Everyone knows it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Temporarily embarrassed millionaires…

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Te only reason they're not a millionaire yet is because of all the illegal immigrants and minorities taking all the jobs...probably

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Social Security's great for the old folks, but there's no way it'll be around when we're old"

Votes for the guy trying to destroy social security.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, technically that's correct, if they keep voting for the guy trying to destroy social security lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The amount of people I see being payed minimum wage but dont want a living wage is insane. I don't get it

[–] Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Same vibe as:

"I won't work overtime because I end up losing money on taxes"

That's not how tax brackets work!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What they (Republicans, conservatives, libertarians, centrists) really want is emergency departments over run with patients who can't get care for chronic conditions and then they have an excuse to repeal EMTALA. At that point they'll be able to sink people deep into medical debt and when social security and Medicare/Medicaid fails to cover the costs then we can force medically disabled people into low wage jobs and take their assets to sell at pennies on the dollar to mega corps and further consolidate wealth in this country.

We should instead create a pipeline for that wealth to flow through the lower and middle class on it's way up to the top bringing the floor up and making sure basic infrastructure like medical care has the funding it needs.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

If you make the wealthy ultra wealthy then their urine is full of healthy nutrients when they piss on you.

That’s the basis to tinkle down economics.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, no, they don't mean me! They mean all the people that don't deserve it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 21 points 2 months ago

I don't need no Obummercare, I'm covered by the Affordable Care Act!

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

I swear we're living in a season of South Park

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago

I'm not American, but this happens a lot more than you'd think.

I live in Canada.

A relative of a friend actually voted for a party called "the People's party of Canada", and one of their goals as a party was to eliminate subsidized housing. That relative of my friend.... lived in subsidized housing and was not able to afford to have a home if not subsidized.

They literally voted for a party that, if they had won, would have made them homeless.

I don't think that the PPC won a single district (giving them no seats in government); much to their benefit and their disappointment.

Schools really need to teach critical thinking.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

To be fair it's not hypocritical to use service you're entitled to and still be against it. After all, you paid for it with your taxes.

[–] Tyler@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

But voting against it to remove its benefit to others is the hypocrisy. For instance, a cousin of mine was on her parents' insurance until the cutoff of 26 because of Obamacare and was all about getting rid of it. I would point out how she was only insured because of it (this was before her being 26 and booted off) and asked her what her next plan for being insured would be. Of course she didn't think that far ahead and just said she would be 26 by the time anything changed so it wouldn't matter.

The party of grifters is aptly put.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

But they're only going to repeal Obamacare, not the Affordable Care Act!

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

When you’re mad for needing healthcare.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Reminds me of all my union brothers who vote for anti union conservatives

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Cool meme, but surely you realize that using a system and being against the system are not in conflict.

Then again if they like the system and think it shouldn't be dismantled and still vote for someone who wants to dismantle, that's dumb stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like my retiree father-in-law who insists that Social Security isn’t a social service and should be the one exception to absolute abolition of all government services because they’re “communist.”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

In Kansas it's a hot issue to expand ACA benefits and has widely popular support. Yet we for some reason keep on voting in Republicans whose major issues are just removing tax brackets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

You can mathematically group the people in your life in such a way so that half of the people you know are stupider than the other half.
I swear to fuckin' god, man, politics make it real easy to tell who goes in which half. It's not a perfect method, but it works at least 85% of the goddamned time.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I supported the ACA (though would’ve preferred a public option), but the one time I actually needed to use it, was for my Dad when his private insurance from his job kicked him off after retirement, the rates and coverage seemed bad, like it was just such a hassle with no great benefits. It’s only when I realized my Dad could still get Tricare that I switched over to that and that was a million times better (even more reason for govt-funded healthcare). I have no idea why my Dad hadn’t been using it the whole time either, he probably wasted tens of thousands of dollars getting private insurance. I still think ACA is a step in the right direction, BUT public option still needs to happen, Fuck Joe Lieberman for blocking that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah. Relying on the ACA, and voting for people who want to abolish it is a leopards eating faces situation.

The guy in this meme is wrong because he's not paying attention to the wider pressures of society, and the needs of the people he's talking to, when those people just want a better system.

He disagrees with the woman demanding better ethical practices from Apple because she uses an Apple product, but the reality is that it is difficult to navigate modern society without a smartphone, and there's pretty much no brand that doesn't have some ethical failings in their supply chain. It's not hypocrisy to point out a systemic issue, and want to see it resolved, if your participation is unavoidable.

He disagrees with the man wanting seatbelts for his car, because he bought a car without them. Wanting greater safety features for the machinery you regularly operate is pragmatic, not hypocritical. Seeing a problem and offering a solution is a productive thing to do.

But relying on the ACA for access to healthcare, and then voting to have the ACA dismantled with absolutely no plan on how to replace it, essentially denying millions of Americans, including themselves, access to healthcare? That's just fucking insane. There's no call for a better system. There's no suggestion for how to do things differently. Just a call to tear down a system that people rely on for their health.

If you think that we ought to hear the Republicans out on their anti-Healthcare agenda, or that people who rely on the ACA aren't voting against their own interests when they vote Republican, you're not paying attention to what's at stake.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›