this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
176 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31182 readers
497 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The TV business isn't just about selling TVs anymore. Companies are increasingly seeing viewers, not TV sets, as their most lucrative asset..."

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Anissem@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] fantasty@programming.dev 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Go away, batin!

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I miss dumb TV. I would pay more for a dumb OLED TV. Then add the media box of your choice, be it an Apple TV, a Raspberry Pi or whatever…

[–] Steve@communick.news 22 points 3 weeks ago

Commercial monitors or digital signage displays are out there.
B&H has a good selection.
They are a bit more expensive, but not crazy.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I thought not connecting it to the internet will make it OK?

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

Some literally will not let you use them without an Internet-enabled setup

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They can also hijack the connection of a connected box (ethernet over hdmi) or via a connected phone (bluetooth & chromecast iirc)

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Any source on this?

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I just don’t use the smart features. Maybe it’s because I run Pi Hole, but I don’t have any ad issues at all using Apple TV.

There are ads on YouTube TV, the normal ones you find on broadcast TV or cable, and that is all.

[–] proton_lynx@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh man, I would kill for this...

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The processor in my Bravia seems to do wonders for image quality tho. Same file on my HiDPI computers doesn't look nearly as good.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I’m okay with image processing in the screen, by smart, I mean with a media platform and apps installed on the screen. I have two Roku TV that are now unusable even as a screen because the recent Roku software updates made the whole tv sluggish as hell even to simply turn on to an input like HDMI. It’s baaaaaad. Image processing on the other hand no biggie (as long as it’s not this motion flow shit)

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I have a 2012 Vizio TV with a Chromecast. I have it hooked to WiFi so that I can cast to it. Is it able to connect to the Internet through the Chromecast?

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If connected via HDMI, no. But your TV might be able to act as a remote control for your Chromecast. No internet data via HDMI.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago

How about 10x more

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Very much unrelated but I recently read samsung's smart monitor/tv privacy policy and it says they can record EVERYTHING you do on it and devices connected to it including programs or games you use and you can't opt out of this short of foregoing smart features (except screen casting) altogether. There's also an option (that doesn't look optional in their ui) that lets them automatically process that data.

I'd heard those things were ridiculous but didn't imagine this much

[–] naun@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Does that mean they don't (or can't) steal information when you're screen casting?

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

I think they only do if you agreed to the privacy policy

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"each new connected TV platform user generates around $5 per quarter in data and advertising revenue."

Sounds like a pathetic amount of money for betraying your customers with a shitty ad infested smart tv

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But televisions cost hundreds of dollars at least

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The profit they get from the sale of the television should be enough that they don't have to make the television shit to get slightly more profit, why do people even buy these

[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago

The profit they get from a tv is a single sale. The way they want to make money nowadays is as passive income, that's why they're pushing all the subscription services everywhere. It's a lot more money for them.

Think of it like this: a $500 tv can earn them $50 profit, but $5/quarter for the same tv means they get double that profit in 2 and a half years. And they'll probably make triple or quadruple that, so they get 4 times as much money for the same tv sale.

[–] admin@lemmy.nowhere.moe 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

what the hell guys, it's not even free and i am the product anyway ?!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago

Can sell the TV cheaper than the competition, if you get some revenue from ads. Race to the bottom, market regulates itself, and so on.

[–] teagrrl@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Recently had to buy a new TV due to a lightning strike (surge protector did nothing) and I never let my new "smart" TV communicate with the internet and it becomes a "dumb" TV and I feel pretty good about that.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

The annoying thing is that even without it connected to the internet, it's still slowed down by the OS. I did the same and it's still not as responsive to things like switching inputs as the projector I was using before it.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the way to do it. Sadly, my wife really wants to use the Roku remote. I must oblige her.

[–] doc@fedia.io 6 points 3 weeks ago

Pi Hole successfully blocks all that.

Note I have my router redirecting all requests to port 53 (DNS) to the pi hole for those things that don't obey the DHCP DNS. Not sure if Roku is one of those offenders, but I haven't seen a Roku ad in years.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago

Na, I'm still using a TV from 2009.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sceptre TVs. All dumb, affordable and are great in terms of panel. That's my next brand now that my old LG Nanocell is already showing dead pixels.

https://www.sceptre.com/TV/4K-UHD-TV-category1category73.html

They do sell smart TVs too, but that's not what any of us is looking for.

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I just got one of these last week for $150 new. The panel won't be winning any awards for visual quality, nor will the speakers be lauded by audiophiles, but it perfectly serviceable and affordable.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah. At the end of the day, for the price and the privacy, I'm totally willing to add a dumb soundbar to it as well 🤣

The Yamaha Audio SR-C20A seems like a good option.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I bought one in november to only use the HDMI to my Linux desktop. I'm never connecting it to the internet.

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, wait. Turns out, this thing I’ve been using as monitor for my HTPC actually has some of this ancient TV stuff people keep talking about. Who would have known.

So do I have a TV now? Technically…

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago

Pfft, speak for yourself 😏I'm too poor to afford a TV.

In all seriousness, I can't afford a TV but wouldn't buy one if I could because the dual monitor setup I have + a mini projector > modern TV nonsense. My projector isn't anything fancy-- just a 720p bulb projector but I'm convinced that 4K, maybe/probably 8K laser projectors will be the endgame for many people, simply because at that point the resolution to screen size ratio for most people will be where the law of diminishing returns really starts to kick in.

In 2024, nearly 60% of Steam users are still using 1080p monitors-- myself included. The shift for the average person from 1080p to 4K is taking considerably longer than the shift from 720p to 1080p. 1080p came out in 2007, 4K came out in 2012. Only a 5 year difference but 1080p remains king for the time being specifically because 4K is too expensive for the average person and harder to justify, particularly for computer monitors.

For TVs, I think there's always going to be the core chunk of people who just mindlessly buy smart TVs without putting any thought into privacy but I really do think that long term, we're going to see a shift towards laser projectors that just accept video inputs from whatever source a person's using, i.e. a Kodi box, PC, etc. Part of why I think this is because laser projection even during daytime is amazing.

I'm rambling away but yeah, I think at a certain point between the ads and the fact that most people don't care that much about 4K over 1080p (especially considering the enormous price difference), people are going to tap out soon.

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh I didn't know that. Sorry I was living my life to the fullest sailing the high seas 🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

There a manufacturer called Spectre that has very good TVs of all sizes, at great prices and no smart features whatsoever.

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

sounds of the fan for a raspberry pi running pihole begin to filter through the background noise ya'll allow ads on your network?