this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
226 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19125 readers
4063 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A group of wealthy pro-Israel political donors in the US have spent the last few days raising hundreds of thousands of dollars, in an eleventh-hour campaign trying to unseat Congresswoman Ilhan Omar in her primary election this week.

Until now, Omar had not faced an Aipac offensive in her primary election this year and has been able to raise triple the amount of funds that her opponent Don Samuels has. Omar has raised $1.6m, compared to Samuels' $535,000.

But after Bush lost her primary election last week, largely in part to a massive spending campaign by Aipac and its Super PAC, The Intercept obtained access to a WhatsApp group, titled, "Zionists for Don Samuels Against Ilhan Omar", where a screenshot was posted saying that nearly $100,000 was raised in 24 hours for the campaign against Omar.

Pro-Israel groups have been spending heavily in this year's election to try and help elect moderate Democrats in favour of progressives who have spoken critically against Israel or pushed for legislation in favour of Palestinian rights.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 153 points 2 months ago (6 children)

AIPAC operations need to be made illegal.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Definitely. Blatant foreign interference in US elections.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If it were just this. The encroachment of this organisation is unfathomable

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not just AIPAC, it needs to extend to ANY foreign money.

[–] runjun@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

Not just any foreign money, it needs to extend to any PAC.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

They should be forced to register as agents of a foreign government.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But then how will centrist Democrats know what their policies are?

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You mean super PAC operations?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Getting Citizens United overturned to stop PAC operations would be a good thing, but I'm specifically speaking of the funneling of money from foreign sources into PACs that are causing this current issue. We shouldn't be allowing foreign entities to sway our fucking elections.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Sabotage seems reasonable at this point

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 104 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a Jew, allow me to say: back the FUCK up off my Ilhan Omar!

Go back to missing the point of the story of Passover, you dense shitasses

[–] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

This Jew agrees, she’s an amazing representative. She’s genuine, caring, honest, a take-no-shit badass, and an effective lawmaker. Her story is inspirational and should be a model for anyone who wonders if there are any good elected officials left.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 83 points 2 months ago

Best wishes to Ilhan Omar, she is a strong voice for good in congress.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Minneapolis loves Ilhan. Have fun wasting money lol

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also the fundraising was like 100k when the difference between Omar and Samuel's war chests is over a million. They're gonna have to do a lot more than that to even hit parity.

Let them waste it!

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I'll be voting for her in the primary tomorrow.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 months ago

If that's true, it's a waste of money. The primary isn't even close; there's a good reason why AIPAC didn't get involved.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 15 points 2 months ago

Israel now supports Nazis…. I guess the real zionists were right the nation state thing is a bad idea

[–] Floey@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

I can't imagine it doing much. Samuels is a joke, Omar has no serious competition and neither does Klobuchar. It's unfortunate because despite what you think about these politicians, competition is a good thing to prevent stagnation.

[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

How is this any different than Oligarchy.