The appropriate response when a fascist makes a good point is to tell them to fuck off, because they're going to twist that to fit their bullshit.
Nothing. He's banking his win on core supporters only, hoping Harris fumbles in the days leading up, and planning another coup. He's just detailing the culture war stuff.
By the nature of ETFs, you're definitely going to make less income because your money gets put into an investment pool and returns are proportional. However it makes you less tied to the stock market, which is increasingly tied to a person's ability to retire
Well, both of us are socialists (I can't comment on the other person). We think about money in such a different way that any money joke about investment is going to lose it's humor. I don't understand it as a joke either, but I definitely understood the financial advice. He selected some large, relatively uncontroversial companies that will pay you part of the quarterly profits based on the number of stocks you own. Tbh I'd avoid the day trading and choose high dividend ETFs instead. $100k is still very out of reach for most people, but it's a reasonable investing portfolio.
And the dude said it to a native American whose tribe has been in the region for millennia. He's not even a native to the state.
Right, I'm not denying that. People have always been smart. The problem that calculus solved was the intensely difficult algebra that it replaced
The joke is that calculus as a field of mathematics didn't exist until millennia after the fall of the empire
Because the faces have no consistency lmao, pain rated at 5 shouldn't look happier than rank 1
Probably, but it's a hardware store. I don't know about the habits of folks outside of my little corner of the Midwest, but very few people return things to them anyways
Watch out for that 11% rebate
Edit: sometimes I forget that Menards is a Midwest thing. Their big advertising thing is that you can mail your receipt to receive 11% of the bill back
British people were forced to abandon their rock piles and most of history since has been about them making it everyone's problem
Real question, are there any instances of someone's research being so niche that the only option is to cite themselves?