this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
160 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4644 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vice President Kamala Harris is set to formally accept the Democratic Party’s nomination at the convention, which will kick off in Chicago on Aug. 19.

Several prominent Democratic figures are set to speak at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago this month, two sources familiar with the plans told NBC News.

President Joe Biden, former presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been confirmed as speakers at the convention. Obama and the Clintons delivered speeches during the 2020 DNC, which was largely held virtually to prevent the spread of Covid-19 amid the pandemic.

A source familiar said that former President Jimmy Carter’s grandson Jason Carter is also confirmed to be speaking as a representative for his grandfather.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 55 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Not really a huge fan of wheeling out Hillary when a speech by historically unpopular Biden - as sitting president - is already unavoidable. We want to maintain this momentum of Harris being something new and fresh and not associate her with all the establishment democrats everyone hates.

At least Obama is a great speaker, and maybe his speech can lead to more deranged racist statements from Trump to further derail his campaign.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hillary speaking only helps Republicans.

Giving her the mic is an incredibly stupid move, but her egos too big to ever shut up.

I'll probably just watch Obama's speech on its own.

Voters don't want or care about Hillary and Biden, we need to leave them in the dust to show voters the party is going to follow voter's wishes instead of unpopular party insider's opinions on what's best

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Voters rejected Kamala pretty hard in the 2020 primary. I'm pleased with the current momentum and thrilled with her VP pick, but associating Kamala's run with respect for voter's wishes is a bit of a stretch. It was the Democratic establishment that positioned her to be the candidate, not voters.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone who voted for Biden in the 2020 general also voted for Harris. We're sticking with the Biden administration, it's just that Biden is retiring from it.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 3 points 4 weeks ago

Everybody who voted for Biden didn't even vote for Biden. The 2020 election wasn't about Biden or Harris, it was about Trump.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

I agree about Hillary but disagree about Biden. His reelection campaign was extremely unpopular (and rightly so) because of his obvious decline in health, but I disagree that a Biden speech will be ill-received now that he’s made the historic sacrifice for the good of the country and passed the torch. I think his speech at the DNC will be a very positive moment.

As you imply, you pretty much have to have a Biden moment, so we’ll just see how it goes (and I hope I’m right!)

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Agree completely. Just keeps popping up like herpes.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why in the world would they have Hillary Clinton speak? She's not a former president and is probably the only person more broadly disliked than Anita Couch.

Fairly or not (and, to be clear, it's largely unfair), Hillary Clinton is still one of the least liked politicians in the country. Visibly tying her to the democratic party and Harris just seems like an unforced error.

It's bad enough Bill Clinton is going to be up there, but as a former two-term president I guess it's hard to argue with. But a roundly disliked former presidential candidate that lost their bid due to arrogance? Who's next, John Kerry? The DNC is filled with idiots.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Jackin Dacouch Vance

Edit: If you hadn't seen it, there is a picture of him in drag about a decade ago that surfaced. It's been trending with both Anita Couch and Sofa Loren as tags.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

Man, it's time to let the old guard out to pasture. Obama is the only one of those I'd have any inclination of listening to.

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ugh. What will it take for Hillary to stop fucking up elections?

[–] jprice@kbin.run 27 points 1 month ago

Keep the Clintons at home please.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get that they kinda need to have Biden there to speak but please give him the minimal amount of time possible. Let Kamala shine and not give the other sides opportunity for sound bites of Biden slips.

Also, put a muzzle on Hillary

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Zero reason for the Clintons to speak... In fact if they could just disappear forever and let us put that whole narcissistic sociopath episode behind us, that would be fantastic

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Barry needs to bow out of the spotlight after this election too, he’s not nearly as bad as the Clinton’s in my eyes but we have to get over the nostalgia show in the political world, it’s time to make new roads and empower new leaders, not stay anchored to those of the past

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dubya's the only other former Republican president who's still alive. Kinda funny that the last Republican president before him and Trump was Bush Sr. in 1992.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dubya was endorsed by his father. This is Trump’s third election. That’s why it says the third time in a row.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's actually his fourth - he ran in 2000 as well. But not as a Republican.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You’re right. I forgot about his Reform Party run.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Man, Biden looks like a wax figure in that photo.

Glad he stepped down from the election. If Kamala wins, that could be his biggest accomplishment.

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Democrats support their own party leaders and vice versa. Republicans condemn their past leaders and support only Trump.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Not Saint Reagan.