JigglySackles

Lol who hurt you dude? Damn, never seen such vitriol over basic ass communication. It would make you more coherent and prevent people having to reread to interpret your stuff, but whatever. Obviously you are beyond the point of convincing, it's just wild to see someone hate something so basic.

I like your physics.

Basically this. Make it so that people live in places conducive to not owning a car. If people live places where it is miles between their needs and there is no accessible form of alternative transport, you're stuck with cars.

America is stupid for excessive guns. But this is stupid in the other direction. Talk about over policing. Fuck me this is stupid

I mean... To be a little bit fair, the middle east doesn't police things nearly as much as a general rule. Lots of people break the law with zero consequences. I lived next door to Saudi for a time and it was a little better where I was but still a world of difference in adherence to and enforcement of general laws compared to most western countries.

Just walk halfway to the gym and then give up and walk home.

There is a key difference there I think. That is that one is engaged in saving people that are about to die, the other has power to ruin a large swath of ordinary lives and set orders in place that destroy industries or prop up harmful ones, and remove agencies and regulations that keep people safe. They should be held accountable at all times of their presidency. They should be concerned about what can happen if they make a greviously bad decision. There should be no immunity and they should be held accountable for their actions just as every other person in this country is.

And again, in an ideal world, they would be held accountable by laws. But in this case, if we are talking Trump, he will not be because the highest court in the nation, is corrupt and planted by him as loyalists to him, and will give him a free pass and now will say it was because he had immunity. I and ideal world we wouldn't have to have this conversation, but we are not talking about an ideal world.

True, but your defense of it does give the appearance that you at the least do not mind it. You don't seem to find it problematic, and to others that itself is also problematic. Please feel free to contradict me if I'm wrong, but from what you've said so far you really, as I mentioned, do seem to not see the issues or repercussions this will have.

And the courts bought by Trump and Co. will see to it that every criminal behavior is considered official and constitutional. You are a bit blind if you see this having any positive effect. The president, and anyone else for that matter, should have zero immunity. Immunity only invites abuse. Just look at qualified immunity for a great example of how it is a failed idea.

What's a criminal act when your highest court gives you a free pass? Laws mean nothing if they are not enforced.

That's his m.o.

I suppose my argument is that if a law is unjust, then so is the punishment for breaking it.