this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
283 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3733 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

She worked the phones. Her team worked the delegates. When it was over, she had quickly locked down the nomination in a “well-orchestrated cascade,” as one party leader put it.

Late on Sunday morning, Vice President Kamala Harris summoned a small clutch of her closest advisers and allies to the Naval Observatory, where she lives and works, with little notice and even less information.

President Biden had informed Ms. Harris earlier that morning that he was withdrawing from the race. The vice president had assembled her team so that the exact moment Mr. Biden formally quit, at 1:46 p.m. — one minute after the president had informed his own senior staff — they were ready to go.

Time was of the essence. A sprawling call list of the most important Democrats to reach had been prepared in advance, according to two people with knowledge of the situation. The vice president, in sneakers and a sweatshirt, began methodically dialing Democratic power brokers.

...

The blitz demonstrated exactly the kind of vigor and energy that Mr. Biden had lacked in recent weeks. Mr. Biden had reportedly made 20 calls to congressional Democrats in the first 10 or so days after the debate, while his candidacy hung in the balance. Ms. Harris made 100 calls in 10 hours.

At the same time that Ms. Harris was dialing, a new whip operation was set up to wrangle delegates who will ultimately select the nominee, integrating her team and the pre-existing Biden-Harris campaign’s delegate operation.

Non-paywall link

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 96 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Such a stark contrast. For so long Biden's campaign just didn't seem to be fighting for anything, they kinda coasted and kept their heads down so as not to cause a stir or trigger any kind of controversy. Now Harris has cranked things up to eleven and is pounding Trump/Vance into the dirt with media blitzes amid seamless coordination with the entire Democratic Party. If she governs the way she's handled this campaign, then bring it the fuck on.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Remember a week ago when there was “not enough time” to replace Biden? Clearly that was bullshit but no one wants to talk about it.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Jon Stewart had a really good analysis of that on his podcast. Not only that, the show he did right before Biden stepped aside included a guy from CNN who made exactly that argument. "It's too late. There's nothing we can do because it's too complicated." He looked like an idiot during that show because the other guests obliterated every argument he tried to throw out, and sure enough the day Biden withdrew he was invited back to CNN to do the "this is a good opportunity to move forward" whiplash. I'll admit I was fully on the "It's Biden, stop complaining" train originally, but his debate performance took the floor right out from under my feet. Anyone still arguing to keep him in after that performance was participating in a different reality than the one the rest of us live in.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There would not have been time for a contested convention and the usual circular firing squad that Democrats are known for. It's nothing short of a miracle that we seem to have avoided that.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

No she didn't! My boss swears she dropped out already! Cause "umm ackshually its illegal". Thats how scared they are of her, they can't look at reality right now.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It would be cooler if your boss could notice illegal things when they are insurrections, stealing boxes of classified documents, extorting foreign countries, oh, and raping women.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

anything done by the high priest of a cult is morally correct, this is why they don't care when he rapes or brags about it

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Whatever rapes he does are also "hurting the right people." They want him to hurt their political enemies.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

They literally made "when the president does it, it's not illegal" the law of the land.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As illegal as someone with 34 felonies?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Conservatives just consider that as political prosecution. That fact is ignored harder than climate change

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I’m curious what they thought it was illegal about it?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

He insisted her having access to the Biden-Harris campaign funds was illegal so they shut down the campaign. Not even joking. I even searched it in front of him, nothing came up but her 2020 stuff, and he still insisted.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You could explain it like running mates are a married couple. If one of them dies (drops out), the other one legally has access. Everything goes to them.

Your boss would be correct if a completely different person tried to inherit those campaign funds.

They probably get their news from the typical right wing, Fox style, outlets. They say “is this legal?” And then everybody starts to think questions are reality. I feel bad for your boss. Being that brainwashed.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I dont. Dude is rich as fuck. If he wants to be an idiot, too, at least he's proving its through sheer luck and happenstance instead of any merit.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

100 calls in 10 hours is solid work and I would imagine entirely exhausting.

One summer while in college I worked in a call centre. Worst job of my life so be kind to call centre workers folks. If I remember correctly we would rack up around 140 calls in a day but many of those were very short and obviously I didn't have a presidential nomination on the line. :)

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That's like a 10 minute call every 6 minutes. (I'm guessing it's not a quick, "please endorse me" call but a conversation on why.)

Or 2-3 calls that are a few minutes each with longer ones in the middle

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Imagine that room. You can just picture phones being handed around left and right and wild panic in the air.

"This one's been holding for 7 minutes already"

"See if X can take a call at 11:15"

"What timezone are they in?"

I'd say it was well orchestrated mayhem.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

That's how it goes at my job. Most calls are around 5 minutes, the good ones are 2 to 3 and the worst ones run 15ish. Couple times a year I'll get the 40 minute ones that make me wanna rope.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The article says she and her team made 100 calls.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago

I wonder if Biden's campaigning chops were weakened not just by his age, but by the fact he seldom actually had to campaign very much, just due to his circumstances.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The current MAGAchud talking point is that Democrats “staged a coup” to get rid of Biden, which is probably illegal or something (no it doesn’t make any fucking sense - these are trump core supporters, they’re not geniuses).

Anyway, the NYT is aware of that. Please read this otherwise unremarkable article in that light.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They want to confuse things to normalize coups. "Jan 6 was no big deal because Democrats stage coups too."

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

same with impeachment, since their guy is the only president to be impeached twice.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Go Kamala GO! MAGAts are squirming in their cesspools

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I was cool on Harris in the original debates, but holy shit. I am somehow excited again.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah, this is exactly the energy level you need to speedrun a presidential campaign in three months. I hope she keeps it up!

[–] shadearg@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Kamala had the majority of delegates needed for nomination in under 33 hours.

1.3 days.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Step 1. Be vice president.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Step 2: Have all your possible opponents for the nomination enthusiastically endorse you immediately.

Or are we all just forgetting what happened ::checks watch:: three days ago?

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was pissed we didn't have a primary this year but somehow I am so damn excited for Harris. I feel like it would have been worse to try to have a primary now

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Agreed, it would be chaos. That's exactly why Trump and team keep trying to suggest there needs to be one, and why Dems should avoid one.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] TwigletSparkle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Step 3: profit

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, when the calls initially started for Biden to resign, she probably had a plan in place. Hell, back when Biden mentioned that he may be a one-term president years back, Harris probably had a plan in place to ramp things up. It's just that this plan got used a little sooner than others expected.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Her store had merch available when he dropped out. This absolutely was coordinated ahead of time.

[–] Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm 100% behind Harris, so I don't really care, but this is a puff piece. There's no way she found out the day of, there was too many ads and too much merch ready to go.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

It's possible to prepare for things and not know when or even if they'll ever go live.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Don't put aside that most if not all people they contacted had basically been waiting for this to finally happen.