this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
114 points (97.5% liked)

News

29236 readers
3699 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

For refugees check out Anki

Like most FOSS it's a little diy but the features that would allow one to create a 90% the-same language learning experience are all there. There also may already be decks that powerful on ankiweb.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, left Duolingo at the start of this year and broke my 1500+ day streak. Because the AI slop was terrible. From nonsensical language to math questions that were flat-out wrong, I just saw zero benefit to continuing to give them money.

[–] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Huh. Interesting. What kind of math were you learning where you noticed the errors?

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ratios, I think? Was pretty early. Math thing was way to easy and I stopped pretty fast. Probably be fine for an 8 year old, but for an adult it was way too simple. And ya, occasionally it was flat out wrong. Like 2+2=5 wrong.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

You can tell all of the new content is written by AI. It suuuuuuucks.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Welp...

Bye Bye Duolingo...

There goes my French practice...

No way shall I support your use of so-called AI to theoretically reduce your costs while enshittifying my experience and enshittifying the planet's ecosystem.

FFS.

🤷‍♂️ 🤡 🖕 🖕

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Also, how do I know I'm learning (language) anymore and not just unknowingly learning some completely incorrect halucinated version of (language)

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Come to Memrise, it’s where I’ve been learning awhile now and I quite like it.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm on Day 189 of Spanish. RIP duo.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago
[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

My brother in owl, I'm on 3249.

[–] somehacker@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I’m on day 2562. Been a paying user for more than a decade. Told them to get fucked in my cancellation.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

The bird really did die

[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 6 points 2 days ago

Join francophone Lemmy communities

[–] GarboDog@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Just requested a partial refund and a download of Al information they have of us. In an official customer service reply from Duolingo granted me a full refund and instructions towards downloading the data. Interesting g enough the customer service reply was named Oscar AI Support. Interesting

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Duolingo sucks for language learning

Slow input method with the word bank which really doesn’t matter early on but becomes a chore that slows progress later on

Doesn’t really do much in the way of correcting errors unless you pay money for the highest level subscription and even then the error correction is weak. A platform like Duolingo has the potential to do really cool error correction; to literally point out the exact error you made and tie it to an explanation. Obviously that’s difficult especially as things become more challenging but duo has had a decade and millions in development funds, which they’ve spent making the courses actively worse to drive up subscription costs and iaps

The lessons are so focused on the whole “gameification” thing that unless you specifically go back to constantly practice vocabulary (and if applicable characters) you will never retain anything. If you merely pound through a Duolingo course from a-b on the prescribed “path” you will struggle immensely and forget tons of early vocabulary and grammar concepts that are introduced and then never brought back unless you seek them out. There are “weak skills” lessons but they are relatively uncommon so you can feel like you’re constantly progressing

The word banks similarly don’t necessarily test retention and just test your ability to do a quick game of matching

You’ll learn something but if you truly want to learn a language there are far more efficient ways. Duolingo is a practice tool at best

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You’ll learn something but if you truly want to learn a language there are far more efficient ways. Duolingo is a practice tool at best

What are some better ways?

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

It’s really hard to beat flash cards. I like Anki a lot because it codifies them and makes the process of “have I mastered this” a bit more streamlined. Though I feel like a lot of people just download premade decks and while that’s fine you learn a lot making the deck. You can’t get around hours of studying vocab and grammar, especially if you’re after the critical period (which I would hope everyone posting here is)

The gameification that Duolingo brings is valuable and very motivating for a lot of people. The problem is that over the years like many capitalist ventures Duolingo made language learning secondary to earning income. So the primary goal of the app suffers at the expense of keeping you constantly engaged so that you’re far more likely to buy shit even if that means ultimately dont learn all that much

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The best language learning system I've found is Language Transfer .

It's free, but it easily beats Duolingo and anything else I have tried (short of total immersion).

I still donate $10/month even though I haven't used it for a while, because I want it to succeed!

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've seen a few posts recommending language transfer, but when I've checked out their website, all it seems to be is a bunch of recordings on soundcloud of some guy talking about how great his course is.. Is there is no interactivity or feedback, or scoring ? Is there more to it than I'm seeing on the website ?

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The courses are all just audio files. You don't need anything else, and I think they work very well. The app is very convenient, simple but without unnecessary bills and whistles and it works fine. This also means that you can download them, put them into your favorite music or podcasting app, or whatever else you want. I consider it a feature, not a bug.

The first episode is an introduction to the teaching method. For the language part, you should start with the second episode.

He is not a native speaker for all the languages, of course. His accent is very English, and from his name I would guess that he speaks Greek natively. But he is also fluent in at least Spanish, the course that I have used, having lived in Spanish-speaking countries.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, so what value does that have over listening to Spanish podcasts ..how do you know if you're speaking it correctly or even understanding the recording ?

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

It's an interactive lesson. You listen to the teacher explaining something to the student, then you pause the audio and try to answer your self, then you continue and listen to the student's response. If you try it, you'll find that it's very natural and effective.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is interesting, thanks

Edit: I take it back. I had some time after work and the app appears to be a collection of lectures from the founder who does not actually speak each language, but feels their teaching method is so unique that it overcomes this. Looking at the website there is no actual description of what makes their method different or better, just a lot of fluff and boasting about how it’s so great. I didn’t speak any of the languages to review content but I do have a background in music so I listened to the 12 minute music theory lesson 1 and it was just him gushing about how great his method is, 0 theory covered. Maybe it is revolutionary but this reeks of pseudoscience

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that the introduction for each of the courses is simply a description of his teaching method. go to the second lesson, and you all find the meat of the course starting.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem is that the description of the teaching method, at least in the theory course, was completely devoid of any rationale for how it is different from any other method of teaching (same as the website)

I have no reason to believe his app and courses don’t provide instruction. My issue is with his grandiosity without substance. An educator of all people should recognize the need to substantiate their claims. This, coupled with the fact that the first thing I am hit with on his site being:

“ABSOLUTELY MAGICAL"

"PURE GENIUS"

"TRULY A MASTERPIECE"

"SERIOUSLY THE BEST LANGUAGE COURSES EVER"

"INSANELY CRAZY GOOD" "LITERALLY CHANGED MY LIFE"

"BLOWN AWAY"

"A TOTAL GAME CHANGER"

"PHENOMENAL"

"WORLD-CLASS"

(None of which are attributed to anyone, of course) makes me really skeptical.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

One of those superlatives may well have been mine. I speak English natively, and have learned French, German, Sesotho, and Japanese (with a combination of classroom and immersion). Learning Spanish with Language Transfer immediately felt right and natural, and I wish I had it for those other languages. I really have never found a better system.

It's not a miracle, and the teacher emphasizes the need for practicing the newfound skills (conversations with native speakers, watching TV or videos, etc.) in order to truly embed it in your brain. But this course really does give you the tools to understand grammar and the connections between the different languages.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Well like I said I’m not outright denying its efficacy, but based on initial reactions the guy is marketing it like pseudoscience and should maybe work on clarifying what his method actually is

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

He actually wrote a manual on his method, where it came from, and how it works. I'm not sure if it is still available for download. I got a copy a couple of years ago.

Are you have to do is get past the first lesson, and then it's all language training.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Check out Mango. I was able to get a free subscription through my library.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

this is the way. My counties online library system offers tons of language sources free to me (the county pays for a license I assume)

[–] Vegasvator@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They have less than 1000 employees. Previous cuts were of 10% of employees. Are they really being replaced with AI or is the curriculum just finished? I have a feeling AI isn't expanding very much of the curriculum. Duolingo is probably just spouting "we have AI" nonsense like every technology company to sound like they are cutting edge.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Are they really being replaced with AI or is the curriculum just finished?

It was not stellar before (lots of mistake, broken sound samples, nonsensical sentences, all never getting fixed despite reporting a lot), and it got measurably worse recently (all of the above in greater amount), so, no, it was not "finished".

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

I doubt they've completely covered every important language. And from what I've seen, their speech recognition quality is terrible. So obviously there's still room for improvement.

And language changes over time, though maybe not much on these timescales. But even if the curriculum officially covers 100% of a language at one point in time, the language is still going to drift from that snapshot.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are they really being replaced with AI or is the curriculum just finished?

Nah, they add new AI slop constantly.

[–] Vegasvator@lemmy.today 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Maybe you aren't far enough along in the lessons.