cley_faye

joined 1 year ago
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Because saying things, even if they are known, is a thing humans do for various reasons. It seems that sometimes they need to be reminded simple truth.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

It's true though. Saying this is not necessarily meant to be the end of a discussion.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is only a threat to people that took random picture at face value. Which should not have been a thing for a long while, generative AI or not.

The source of an information/picture, as well as how it was checked has been the most important part of handling online content for decades. The fact that it is now easier for some people to make edits does not change that.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It was either that or eating your head off.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does these "companies" includes the one that were outed for just doing computation on plain old processors and claiming they had made huge breakthrough in quantum computing?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They want to sell thinner phones, but the optics needs some room to be useful, so it shows. The little range they can get with keeping that much width do a lot for image quality.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There were tons of options with multiple HTML elements with a sequence of CSS properties to reliably provide vertical centering (and also use vertical space at the same time) back in the days.

Now, between flex and grid (mainly flex for me, I find them more convenient) all the HTML scaffolding we used to make this work can be removed to get the same result. That's what I mean with "no trick".

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Well, we've been vertically centring content with no-trick pure CSS for years now, so, good I guess?

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Hey, anything that's not Silver Energy is ok in my book as far as hell portals are concerned.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Say that to governments that wants to locally ban tiktok.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

We had IoT, Web3, and now AI. Part of it seems linked to very good salespeople pushing it onto other salespeople.

For the first two, we've seen business spinup quickly and have very aggressive arguments, backed by cash, pushed onto existing business as "the solution to everything". Only to burn down later as a gimmick nobody really cares beyond a handful of niche applications.

So far with AI there's a handful of "big name" business that pushes it as the ultimate solution for everything and are injecting ton of cash in that discourse. We just have to wait a bit if the last part of that happens. After that we'll go back to normal until the next "big thing" gets propped up.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"worse" is debatable, but they certainly are an issue.

However, that doesn't make it ok in Firefox either. Having a good reputation does not mean you can burn it away by trying your best to look the same as the bad guy you're supposed to fight. Firefox mobile, for a very plain and simple example, have stuff like "future experiment" and telemetry enabled by default. Sure, I can disable them, but they should either be disabled by default, or have a one-time popup that provides the option on the first launch.

My position is that if a piece of software becomes increasingly intrusive and tedious to use with each "update", it's time to look somewhere else. Whether it's Firefox, Chrome, or even OS like Windows. Having to fight back to get to a decent, usable state means that it's no longer the right tool for you.

Fortunately, some people are doing the heavy lifting by providing what would be considered "vanilla" firefox with some good forks, as far as being a browser goes.

view more: next ›