this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
188 points (92.3% liked)

Fuck AI

2573 readers
575 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LupertEverett@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"AI is a tool when it comes to AI art"

I find that rather dumb. Because tools are made to help people. You use a hammer to nail things, for example. You don't leave the hammer to do all the nailing by itself. If your only involvement there is just with your prompt, then you didn't do anything, the computer did. This would be like saying "I commissioned a drawing from this artist and told them what to do, therefore I made this drawing and this artist is a tool".

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The irony here is that the top image looks AI generated but the bottom image appears to be a real photo.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How so? I tried to check for "obvious logical errors", and they turned out to be not that.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
  • weird miniature plate of basil

  • spaghetti on fork is on top of, not coming out of, main plate, and the perspective where the bottom of the hanging noodles falls infront of the plated noodles looks weird

  • hand holding fork weirdly

  • spaghetti rests impossibly on top of fork, not through the tines

  • left most noodle, the short one sticking out, seems to pass under the two noodles above it without displacing them

  • the noodles wrapped around the base of the fork look "off"

  • top right tomato on foreground plate looks like a Frisbee

  • water glass is refracting the plate behind it above the water line as if it's below the water line

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's just the kind over clean aesthetic that most AI has.

[–] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Also the strange repetition of the tomatoes.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Interestingly I think the top "I made this" looks AI generated and the bottom image depiction of AI slop was an actual photo from alamy.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, this does not feel like a point for non AI use. I would still say I made spaghetti or chicken noodle soup or garlic bread or pizza I'd I made it from the can or frozen. I don't use AI imagery though.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One involves boiling water, getting the time right for doneness, making or heating the sauce. It can also turn out well the more skill someone has.

The other is premade in a can and will always be mediocre slop. It is a perfect comparison.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Perfect comparison, eh?

Well, having just made pomodoro sauce from fresh tomatoes, according to this recipe from Marco Pierre White, and in it, he says the secret he was told is 50% fresh and 50% tinned.

Yes pure AI slop sucks but the tech is a pretty nifty tool in certain situations.

[–] BlueSquid0741@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah, you can tell people you made tinned spaghetti for dinner last night. You’ll get the disgusted looks and “I hope you get some real food tonight” comments.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

A better analogy would be counterfeiting money with your printer, especially as the main current side effect of genAI is people started to expect more and more custom-made artwork and photos for regular stuff.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is how I felt about 3d printing and always got shit on for saying it. I can carve or sculpt something for hours and a 3d printed item makes someone go “I made this” well I mean your printer did

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Digital art is still art and effort and talent. You also need to have some technical expertise to know how to use as well as tune and maintain a 3D printer. 3d modeling is not a "snap your fingers and it's there" kind of thing.

[–] Grostleton@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think they may be referring to the kind of people that just lazily pull someone else's 3d rendering from somewhere online, run it through a printer, and go around showing off what "they" made.

There's definitely plenty of those types around...

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I hate those octopuses print things, they're fucking everywhere.

What do you even do with those things? Put them on a shelve to catch dust and shed micro plastics?

Draw. Sculpt. Paint. Write a story.

We don't need more "it's just cool" plastic stuff.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I might agree with you if I hadn't heard ten thousand bad takes over the years about how digital art isn't art or how photographs aren't art or how video games aren't art. If their take was that printing pre-made files isn't art, then they should have said that.

[–] Grostleton@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

They kind of did though, as they're specifically comparing the printing process with the carving/sculpting process with no mention of the creative aspects such as 3d modelling for the printer vs. planning out what you're going to sculpt.

Seems like you're taking it a little personally and twisting words tbh.