this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
518 points (97.3% liked)

World News

46224 readers
2867 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 270 points 5 days ago (17 children)

Speaking as a Canadian... Yes, we know.

You guys had the most trustworthy, most reliable ally ever. The faith and trust between Canada and the US was legendary.

That's gone now. It'll be a century or more before you can ever rebuild that trust.

And you threw it away for this drooling moron to play tinpot dictator.

Was it worth it?

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 85 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Can some of us, uh, join you though?

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 71 points 5 days ago (10 children)

Honestly I've been worrying for years that the only way the US is going to resolve this division and hostility within their country is by breaking up, possibly largely along red state/blue state lines, and hopefully not triggering a violent (or god forbid nuclear) civil war in the process.

But I can say as a Canadian, if it does come to that, and you guys can't take back your country (which I really think you can, once you start to accept what is happening and accept that it's gonna hurt and you dig your heels in anyway, I don't think there's anyone who will be able to take you down, not even Trump and crew), then we would be absolutely happy to quickly rebuild and strengthen our relationship with most of the blue states. And however you end up wanting to arrange yourselves in the end, we'll work with that. And if you guys genuinely wanted our help, our resources, our logistical support, even our protection (what little we can provide), if things were to start looking like actual civil war, I'm sure we'd absolutely be willing to figure out what sort of arrangement is actually going to work. We'd have to at least initially discuss it as equals and as partners though, I don't think we'd ask you or coerce you to give up your sovereignty, any more than we'd want you to take ours. But if the intention to join Canada was a popular attitude, I expect we'd be willing to consider it, probably after some cooling-off period though to make sure it's not just a passing fad. The progressive parts of America are the parts we've always loved. If you guys come knocking on our door needing a couch to crash on we're not going to ask how long you need to stay, we're just going to go find pillows and blankets.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 51 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I assume certain short-term things will get better with anyone less crazy than Trump, but I agree the US is no longer reliable for anything long-term, and no other country should deal with us on the assumption that we'll give up certain short-term advantages for a long term stability within our sphere of influence. It's not even that the US was "good" (though I imagine the next hegemonic power could easily be worse), but across administrations, the US was generally intelligent about how to leverage its influence but retain enough goodwill to continue to do so indefinitely.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 36 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Was it worth it?

Southerners: "Yes, but we get to abuse brown people again!"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] CloudheartTV@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Wait wait, I've seen this one before!

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's something very irritating to me about the President using the word "trolling."

Maybe I'm being a stick in the mud, but the Leader of the Free World using Internet slang just doesn't seem right to me. It's petty, I know, but still.

It is not, however, as irritating as people defending the shit he does to throw the global economy and international community into chaos, by saying he's just trolling.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 10 points 3 days ago

He learned stuff from Elon. That is worrying.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wish Canada would annex the U.S. I want dat universal healthcare 😌

[–] Enceladus@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The compromise is adding the proper pronunciation of the letter Z to the kindergarten curriculum, and highschool gets French courses.

"I'll be aboot time you say zed correctly!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca 59 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Kill him. He only deserves a bullet.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 50 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

U S perspective here.

I keep remembering that oath our armed forces repeat so much: "... To defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic."

What in the flippin' hell do these bastards gotta do to be considered "domestic enemies"‽

Because apparently directly provoking all our neighbors to attack us out of self defense, or allying with friggin' Putin, along with a million other treasons, aren't qualifying enough? Who over there is gonna actually protect and defend the Constitution and the People of the United States of America?!

Because dammit we haven't lived this frickin long, through countless crises and bullshit, just to get shot or bombed by a Canadian we should've been sharing pancakes and beer with!!!

FULFILL THAT OATH YOU LIKE TO RECITE SO MUCH. OR COUNTLESS INNOCENT PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE OVER ORANGE CALIGULA'S EGO.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BubbaGumpsBackLumps@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Preventing a shit show like this was literally why the second amendment was written

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Once again: not "Trump". It's "Republican Party" planning and doing all this

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 74 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (13 children)

And we aren't trolling when we say you'll sign your own death warrant, as a nation, and as a person.

the richest nation on earth with a military budget larger than the domestic budget of dozens of countries combined, couldnt stomach a fight against dirt poor cavemen, armed with cold war and WW2 relics, on the other side of the world, who were so culturally alien to them, they might as well have been from mars. And you're going to pick a fight with people who all they have to do is wear a Bruins hat and they pass for an American?

Ask the Russians how the occupation of their Ukrainian cousins territory has worked out. If you could speak to the dead that is. Those who are still alive, live looking over their shoulder for the rest of their lives.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 83 points 5 days ago (41 children)

I think this bears repeating.

We will make you forget Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. The insurrection will be continent wide and we will just walk over the border and start looting weapons.

We are tougher than anyone thinks and can survive just fine pretending to be homeless or just in your woods or in a looted home.

We will live among you indistinguishable until something good to blow up comes along, or an American needs tied to a tree with their dick in their mouth.

You’ll never feel safe. You’ll never be safe.

Promise.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 42 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Just a reminder to non-canadians that a core part of Canadian identity has always been not being American. It’s a quasi-colonized pov. Make it real and it will be life-or-death for many many folk.

[–] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca 32 points 5 days ago

Yep, I frequently hear people bitching about the state of things in Canada and someone almost always follows up with "eh it could be worse, at least we're not murican"

Fuck murica.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The US' infrastructure is incredibly weak and vulnerable, and there are about a million(!) Canadians living in the US -- and that doesn't include dual citizens which is probably double that.

So it'll be nothing for Canadians living in the US to fuck shit up in a major way. How many refineries do you think the US can lose before people can't buy gas anymore? Those Amazon warehouses look pretty flammable. Datacentres would probably burn pretty good too. How long will it take to replace those high-power transmission line transformers? How is the East Coast going to power itself when Canada stops powering them? How are US airports going to operate when there's small drones continuously overhead? In fact given the hub-and-spoke design of US air travel, only a few airports need to be droned to completely shut down air travel across the US, including shipping. On a final note, only a few hundred grams of thermite can melt of hole through a wing or a fibreglas hull, so a lot of VERY expensive billionaire and government hardware can be reduced to ash with nothing but a small drone and a pissed-off Canadian.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 82 points 5 days ago

Truly the dumbest timeline

[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 75 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We’re taking care of their military. We’re taking care of every aspect of their lives, and we don’t need them to make cars for us,” Trump told Time. “In fact, we don’t want them to make cars for us. We want to make our own cars. We don’t need their lumber. We don’t need their energy. We don’t need anything from Canada. And I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state.

Then stop importing and we'll see how long before it's a problem for the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How is election security in Canada? There was fuckery in the last presidential election here, and I don't doubt they'll try it in Canada too.

[–] lambdabeta@lemmy.ca 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Thanks to Elections Canada it's actually a lot better than the states. We also get answers sooner. There's nothing like an American election to make Canadians thankful for Elections Canada.

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

Yeah, our Elections Canada is quite solid.

The influencing of support for our right-wing party endorsed by Elon Musk/Trump/Jordan Peterson via X, Facebook, and campaign financing is the real issue imo.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Christopher Tidus just did two hour and a half long podcasts with a guest. He never has guests. The guest is a veteran that has teamed up with a data analyst and a computer geek. They have the data. The election was stolen. They used every single method from kicking voters off the eligible elector list, to vote switching, to ballot box stuffing. The election was a sham that shows a clear Russian Tail.

https://youtu.be/UgIay64Obcs

https://youtu.be/t-yr-Mgkhm0

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly? I know who Chris Titus is. Never figured he'd not be a Trump supporter. Know nothing about him really, and I guess my impression of him was completely wrong. So...uhmmmmm...cool! Thanks for sharing!


I'm about 10 minutes into the first part. And, yeah, this is really really....idfk....fuck. Thanks. I'm really glad you shared this.

Edit:

The "mildly tangential ranting" on this comment I made yesterday I think is kinda relevant to this....if only tangentially....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 62 points 5 days ago

“In fact, we don’t want them to make cars for us. We want to make our own cars. We don’t need their lumber. We don’t need their energy. We don’t need anything from Canada. And I say the only way this thing really works is for Canada to become a state.”

So he DOES need things from us. If he didn't need us he'd just walk away and not trade with us. But why would he he want us as a state if we didn't have something he wanted?

He DOES need us, our workers, and our resources but he doesn't like that we're our own sovereign nation. He needs us but he wants us enslaved and controlled.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)

China is walking this dumbass like a dog. How about we don't tie ourselves to this sinking ship.

load more comments (1 replies)

Make sure you talk about this stuff and how unacceptable it is in public.

I ain’t going to El Salvador

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

They really want Fallout to happen.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago

This didn't work out well for the US last time.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o7jlFZhprU4

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

I like to idly game this out because it truly reflects how narcissistic and uninformed he is. So, he's talking about admitting Canada as a single state. Lets assume somehow that happens, even though the Canadians themselves would undoubtedly push for as many states as possible if joining the US were the only option.

You've now got a new largest state by both population and area, and one that has ridiculous reserves of resources and a coast-to-coast infrastructure. It instantly becomes the most important state. It's also full of millions of people who didn't want to be Americans and who've had a hundred years of more progressive governance than the US. Congratulations, Republicans, you've just skewed the Senate and completely fucked yourself in the House for a generation or more. You've also got 8 or 9 million Francophones who weren't even entirely sure they wanted to be CANADIANS, much less Americans, to say nothing of being Americans in a MAGA world. This is how real troubles begin.

So, in return for dubious "improvements" to the trade deficit, and certain (what?) administrative conveniences (I guess) for a military that already had basically all the access anyone would ever need, as well as a giant buffer territory you're not politically committed to defending with the same gusto you would your own soil, you completely upset the balance of power in Congress to your own party's detriment and add a huge population that hates their situation. Brilliant.

Although, I guess if you're just done with free and fair elections then a lot of these concerns evaporate...

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

We'd be joined through the Puerto Rico route, as a territory. No representation. The 51 state is just a ruse to get the 17th territory, or whatever the number is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›