this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
259 points (95.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

3219 readers
193 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fancy cupcakes are 70% icing, really not that nice and a waste of money

(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Outside of Original Trilogy, the best Star Wars movies movies were the ones that JJ Abrams made.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes! Give me some bullshit supermarket cupcakes all day over one of those dumb boutique shops, and homemade over that but who's got the time these days.

While I'm here cakenuts != donuts, donuts require dough not batter and all dunkin style "donuts" are a big ol' lie which would be ameliorated by admitting they're cakenuts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago

The icing is the only part I like - I literally eat the cake separately so that I can maximize the icing-to-cake ratio in a single bite.

This is mostly because frosting is "wet" and offsets how dry the cake is. I dislike the dryness of the cake so much I prefer to eat most of it in one go and get over it, and then enjoy the rest of the cupcake with my preferred 9:1 proportion of icing to cake. 😆

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›