this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
1084 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2279 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Shit, you're absolutely right but I never thought about it that way.

Jesus, we've let these kids down. This is all they've known through their adolescence...

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There will be an entire branch of psychology opened up for kids who were born between 2006-2021. War, climate change, Trump, COVID, more war, more war? On its own, the fact that they're not spending every waking hour in ceaseless screaming is worth writing a few papers on.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean...lots of kids have had to deal with worse...my main frustration is that we could have given them so much better with relative ease.

My grandparents were born in the 30s, growing up in the Great Depression (all but one, who had the awful luck to be born in the Philippines, and instead of the depression, got to experience brutal Japanese occupation). That's far worse than what American kids as a demographic are growing up with now, but that was entirely out of the hands of their parents to avoid.

I feel like for today's teens, it's not that bad, but it's bad because of selfishness and greed rather than huge national or global tragedy.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't know that the two events are particularly comparable. The misery level might be higher for people like your grandparents, but the fact that some of what's going on now is happening inside the house during Thanksgiving dinner and another good chunk of it is being shown and talked about on YouTube as it happens, and a lot of people who are supposed to be protecting them aren't... The circumstances, access, and response is worse, even if the misery itself isn't as bad.

Still, I guess that illuminates how the "suffering Olympics" isn't super helpful to these discussions. Every generation has something, and just because another generation also suffered doesn't mean that this generation's suffering is invalid.

[–] suction@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

maybe your worldview is a liiiitle bit too US-centric, or at least too 1st-world centric? Ah, don't worry your mediocre little head about it!

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

We're literally talking about young US voters. This thread is about US politics. I recognize that Americans' americentrism online runs the gamut from annoying to problematic to outright jingoistic, but in this case I'm pretty sure I accurately recognized the topic at hand. Surely well enough not to merit an ad hominem.

[–] suction@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

aka the dumbest take.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Jesus, we’ve let these kids down.

Yes, and people call them idiots for wanting better than a Hobson's choice between "genocide" and "more genocide."

Just look at what happened when someone listened to them.