this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
677 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4624 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FPSkra@lemmy.world 472 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

I spent 3 years and half a million dollars getting a law degree...and it make me feel good to know that everything I learned there doesn't actually fucking matter. All I needed to learn was that if you are appointed by an authoritarian Cheeto, the law is what you make it.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 176 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"The main benefit of controlling a modern bureaucratic state is not the power to persecute the innocent. It is the power to protect the guilty." - David Frum

[–] FPSkra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

You pretty much learn this, but then you find your way into camp A that attempts to hold up this system, or Camp B where you attempt to use this system to destroy itself....Camp B is struggling right now.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 96 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I have a friend who had a case before Cannon and told me that she was both one of the stupidest and the meanest judges she's ever dealt with, which is saying something since she practices primarily in Florida. As a representative of the caliber of judges the Federalist Society has to offer, Cannon is pretty damning... and if we get four more years of Trump, the federal bench is going to be stacked with jurists even worse than her.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

2016-2020 - how far can I go placing terrible judges that'll do my bidding

2024 - damnit, I could have gone even further the first time.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We are dangerously close to an emperor has no clothes moment in regards to the rule of law. When people digest that the law is whatever it needs to be to suit the needs of the moment, they'll operate as if there is no law and they'll be right. I fear we are already past the point of no return.

All for Donald fucking Trump.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

When the supreme law of the law, the Constitution, is nullified the Great American Experiment ceases to exist - we are there. The war has already begun.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] teft@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Cheetoh Benito or Mango Mussolini or Il Douche

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I've been collecting names for the bastard for awhile. We have...

Adolf Twitler

Benedict Donald

Cheeto Benito

Cheeto In Chief

Cinnamon Hitler

Comrade Cheetolino

Con-Hair

Despot Cheeto

Diaper Don

Draft Dodger Don

The Fanta Menace

Hair Fürher

Il Douche

King Mierdas

The Manchildian Candidate

Mango Mussolini

Orange Julius Caesar

President Gold Man Sucks

Prima Donald

Pumpkin Pinochet

Tangerine Toddler

Tangerine Tyrant

Trumplethinskin

Tweeto Toupee'to

The White Pride Piper

I'm totally going to jail for this if he gets reelected.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The Fanta Menace has a certain ring to it

[–] Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Führer

ftfy. Alternatively, you can write it as

Fuehrer

Solid list though!

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Got it fixed, thank you!

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

King Mierdas gave me a giggle.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago

Pumpkin Pinochet and President Gold Man Sucks were new to me. Nice collection.

Is there away to fit “Out of his element Donnie” in there?

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I was wondering how much this Trump fuckery is going to effect legal precedent since precedent seems to matter quite a lot in the legal system. Or do you think most judges are going to straight up just say Trump gets more legal rights so precedent set by him doesn't matter?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They don't give a shit about precedent. They are fascists appointed by an insurrection leader. They will make decisions that benefit Christian nationalism without regard to anything else.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They're not the only Judges though. If a otherwise normal judge was given an argument in court that brought up the precedent Trump set, laws start to fall apart. I'm worried that many laws will become almost unenforceable no matter who the judge is.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a goal. Laws should only be enforced if it is against a member of the out group.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Members of the out group are allowed to argue precedent too, and like I said not every judge is going to be a fascist, so I'm still worried many laws are going to be unenforceable against anyone.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

not every judge is going to be a fascist

For now

[–] FPSkra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

The problem is the backboard that was a rational supreme court no longer exists.

[–] FPSkra@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I suggest listening to the podcast Strict Scrutiny. They do a fantastic job of breaking down the way the current Supreme Court has just thrown out nearly every well established precedent. And it pretty much is based upon their own individual ideology and not based on any logical interpretation of the constitution.

[–] ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Precedent is dead thanks to chevron overturned. Supreme court took a massive shit on it

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

So much for the legitimacy of our courts and laws

It's almost like Clarence Thomas is acting in the best interests of a foreign power trying to attack and ruin our country

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

the law is what you make it.

Did you thought law was somehow divine before? Laws were always made to serve those who rule since their inception.