this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
537 points (95.9% liked)

politics

18672 readers
2769 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The shooter was 12 when Trump was first elected. archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] capital@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I understand the sentiment but I’d be a fan of having an adult age across the board.

If you can be drafted, you should be able to drink, buy guns, rent cars, vote, etc. That should all be at the same age, whatever that age is.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Couldn't agree more. Let's make the adult age a nice even 20 and call it a day.

(Or ideally 25 if you want to be more realistic about it, given the rate that people mature at, but I have a feeling that would be extremely unpopular.)

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I think 25 is far too old. We already have a problem of not letting teenagers learn to become an adult. Yes you’re going to make stupid decisions in your early 20s, you’re better off making a variety of stupid decisions while you’re still maturing rather than waiting until you’ve finished before taking actions that have consequences.

Also imagine being a 24 year old who either is expected to live with your parents or get an adult to cosign your lease. Or can’t vote. Or can’t decide to have certain medical procedures like an abortion without parental permission. We’ve become far too comfortable with the idea we need to legally disenfranchise young people further.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So would someone over 25 dating someone younger than 25 be legislated?

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think Romeo and Juliet laws cover instances like this already. If I'm not mistaken its like a 3 year window.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm 21, my partner is 27. Now what?

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You call your partner a pedo and and break up.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

no, but I think that was a joke(i hope)

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Ya the military would go bonkers

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

You can legally rent a car at 18, it’s just that no company wants to rent to you.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, and I generally think it should be 18. Some rights should come sooner such as medical autonomy and Romeo and Juliet style consent, but once you hit the age of adulthood you’re legally an adult

[–] Atlas_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And be president. How about 35 for the adulthood age?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

I mean why stop there? I say 65, no, 95 should be the age everyone is considered an adult.

[–] matthewmercury@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah, and very strong anti-child-labor laws.