this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
107 points (74.9% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Downvote the news, but it still remains news.

For such a prominent Senator to have gone public, there must be a torrent of activity in private.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Refusing to see Biden's flaws is incredibly delusional. I understand a bit, running a new candidate could help Trump win. However, running a candidate with dementia will definitely help Trump win. We deserve a candidate with basic debate skills.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is a point of no return when public reception dictates further action and that preception will not reverse. I hate the idea, as I think history will look very kindly on Joe, and it's terrible what's happening. But, by my estimate we have reached that point.

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (22 children)

I'm sorry, he's done some good, but he's also continued delivering weapons to Israel for their genocide in Gaza. If he's looked at especially fondly in the future it'll be through rose tinted glasses.

Still voting for him over Trump, but let's not be ridiculous.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't he already top 10? But his past administration, vs. him now... I dunno what to think. If he were elected, then his administration could continue, but that's a big "if" at this juncture.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He is top 10? It's such a low bar.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

There is a significant cohort of lemmings living in a gaslit fantasy where they've lost themselves in a gamblers fallacy around Biden as candidate. They'll come back around, much later, after he's replaced as candidate, and pretend they were never the person they were.

As far as the posturing and jockeying, game is on I suppose.

Any Democrats who can stand up and show leadership right now stand a very good chance of becoming the most powerful person in the world. Trump is a deeply unpopular candidate. It won't take much to expose his weakness for what it is, we just currently happen to have the weakest possible candidate. Swap the candidate, adopt the positions of the base, and whoever ends up being the nominee can coast into office.

[–] WarmSoda@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

My problem with the whole thing is there hasn't been anyone stepping up and saying how about me. I haven't seen any mention of any actual names whatsoever.

You gotta decide what else to make before you dump the water.

I could be wrong, idk.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My problem with the whole thing is there hasn’t been anyone stepping up and saying how about me. I haven’t seen any mention of any actual names whatsoever.

Anyone who has enough name recognition to get into and be a competitor to Biden isn't going to turn traitor against the party's incumbent unless he explicitly bows out. If they're seen as ousting Biden... it's going to be a shit show of epic proportions. look at the criticism that phillips took. (And philips is basically a younger version of Biden.) In the primary, the only candidate to get on the ballot in more than half the states was Biden. Most got on around half the states, give or take.

Most of the states only had a ballot because they were legally obligated to. the 2024 Primary for the DNC wasn't a real primary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

They will. We're "just on the other side" of a whole paradigm shift. Its only been a week and we're still a good bit out from the convention.

It should be telling that Newsom was on screen within 15 seconds of the debate, and Kamala about the same "surrogating" for Biden. Whats them applying for the job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Or, its very late in the game and this chaos causes the dems to splinter, leaving trump ripe for victory.

You act like you know exactly what will happen, when in reality things can end up pear shaped whether we stick with biden or get a new candidate.

Polls and MSM are focusing on biden, allowing trump to gain ground. Whatever is gonna happen needs to happen NOW.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago (24 children)

If he was merely sick, then one good press conference followed by a second debate might be able to turn things around, just enough, maybe?

But if not...

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mortalic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Who though... Comments like this are useless unless there is a valid replacement. So again... Who, or STFU.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Any Democrats who can stand up and show leadership right now stand a very good chance of becoming the most powerful person in the world. Trump is a deeply unpopular candidate. It won’t take much to expose his weakness for what it is, we just currently happen to have the weakest possible candidate. Swap the candidate, adopt the positions of the base, and whoever ends up being the nominee can coast into office.

I think this is rather obviously true. Many on the left have been pushing for a different, and presumably better, candidate from the beginning, so in a way, all that's changed since the debate is that many more have joined them. So really, all the Dems have to do is provide the people with that candidate, and it'll be a runaway.

BUT...

I'm starting to worry that the DNC is going to fuck it up yet again, and specifically because, just as was the case in 2016 and 2020, they're not only going to not adopt the positions of the base, but are going to instead manipulate the process in order to shove another establishment hack down our throats. And quite likely not even just any establishment hack, but the one that's already proven to be even less popular than Biden - Hillary Clinton.

This is a moment for the DNC to get out of the way and let the people come together and choose the candidate they want. That's the exact thing that will motivate the base, and in turn guarantee Trump's defeat.

I'm just afraid that the DNC won't be able to do that - that in their all-consuming self-centeredness and greed, they're going to fuck it up for all of us, yet again.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Your caution is well warranted.

The biggest mistake the DNC could make would be not taking the advantage that an open convention offers them. They desperately need to put out an air of at least 'presumed' democracy in the shocking un-democratic process which is Democratic elections. The delegates are all corporate, Biden/ Harris democrats. But at least put on a show of democracy. And build the theater a bit. Give the audience some action and some drama. Use the opportunity to build some headlines.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He has gone public? Because he hasn't said anything about this.

All I see are secondhand reports from anonymous sources, which is kind of the opposite of going public.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) is attempting to assemble a group of Democratic senators to ask Joe Biden to exit the presidential race,” the Washington Post reports.

“Warner is telling Democratic senators that Biden can no longer remain in the election in the wake of his faltering debate performance… The Virginia senator has told others that he is deeply concerned Biden is not able to run a campaign that could beat former president Donald Trump.”

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

... according to two people with direct knowledge of the effort

So, he hasn't gone public, at all.

load more comments (1 replies)