this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House statement comes after a week of frantic negotiations in the Senate.

President Joe Biden on Friday urged Congress to pass a bipartisan bill to address the immigration crisis at the nation’s southern border, saying he would shut down the border the day the bill became law.

“What’s been negotiated would — if passed into law — be the toughest and fairest set of reforms to secure the border we’ve ever had in our country,” Biden said in a statement. “It would give me, as President, a new emergency authority to shut down the border when it becomes overwhelmed. And if given that authority, I would use it the day I sign the bill into law.”

Biden’s Friday evening statement resembles a ramping up in rhetoric for the administration, placing the president philosophically in the camp arguing that the border may hit a point where closure is needed. The White House’s decision to have Biden weigh in also speaks to the delicate nature of the dealmaking, and the urgency facing his administration to take action on the border — particularly during an election year, when Republicans have used the issue to rally their base.

The president is also daring Republicans to reject the deal as it faces a make-or-break moment amid GOP fissures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What a stupid thing to focus on. I hate that the southern border is even a topic people bring up. It's a completely made up problem.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

6 million illegals in 3 years. Its a problem. Hell a couple thousand caused problems for NYC. How do tiny border towns stand a chance?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You're forgetting that the entire reason why so many people enter illegally* is because it's next to impossible to enter legally unkess you have lots of connections in the US. Your average foreigner doesn't stand a chance.

Don't want 6 million people to enter illegally? Make it easier to enter legally. It's that simple, yet people like you will never understand that. "Securing the border" only makes the problem worse. We should be opening it instead.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

493,000 immigrant visas were given out in 2022. It's extremely easy to enter, just too many too quick, and y'all have to wait your turn.

[–] Marcbmann@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Eh, but how much of that is tourist visas. And where are they coming from.

I'm of the opinion that an open border with Mexico is an issue. Which just should not be controversial.

But I'm also married to someone who entered with a tourism visa. Legal immigration is nearly impossible in the US. There are very very few options for a person to enter the country and be on a path to a green card. Saying otherwise is purely ignorant.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Non immigrant visas are up to 6.8 million in 2022.

[–] Marcbmann@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You should look at what the requirements look like for an immigrant Visa. The average person in South America does not have the ability to satisfy those requirements. But that doesn't mean they are unable to become a valuable and contributing member of society.

I know people in the US that came here illegally and have gone on to become business owners. But only because they were able to meet and marry a US citizen.

There needs to be a legal path to entry. And we should be stopping the flood of people coming over the border at the same time.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago

We can only take so many, so quickly. What we're doing now is completely unsustainable.

So why not select for the best and brightest?

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Maintain infrastructure, pay for roads that can handle the traffic, pay for public schools that can handle the masses, pay for enough fire fighters and trucks, shit like that, and ramp up in the time frame of 3 years

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They pay sales taxes, sure. But they don't pay income or property taxes, not without an SSN. (Texas does not have an income tax, but has property taxes. The Feds have an income tax. Don't be pedantic)

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Undocumented immigrants pay income tax if they use someone else's SSN or even without an SSN by using an ITIN

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago

So you're suggesting that illegal immigrants should steal identities to pay taxes?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sorry... so you're blaming immigrants for the fact that Texas' tax regulations are severely fucked up?

Maybe Texas shouldn't cater so much of their tax code to rich people? Shouldn't that be the issue?

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago

How is having property tax but not income tax fucked up? How does it cater to rich people, any more than having income tax?