this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
42 points (78.4% liked)

politics

19170 readers
4615 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats and Republicans can agree on one thing coming out of their respective conventions: Almost no one cares about Covid anymore.

Infections are running rampant after the Democratic confab in Chicago, with staffers on Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, reporters and other convention-goers all stricken — and in at least one case claiming the positive test was “worth it.” Cases also cropped up after the Republican National Convention in July.

“Voters do not like it being brought up at all,” said Celinda Lake, a Democratic strategist and pollster for Biden’s 2020 campaign, who marveled at the near-total absence of masks at a Democratic convention where roughly 20,000 people crammed into Chicago’s United Center for a week. “They want to get over it.”

But “if it continues to worsen,” Bartlett said, “both parties will be forced to address it.”

The rhetorical vacuum around Covid comes even as cases have surged over the summer, hospitalizing thousands and killing nearly 700 people in one week in late July.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] paf0@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

To answer your questions, air purifiers are not enough to protect people from Covid according to the CDC, unless you're masking, and you didn't mention that. Also, regular testing is expensive and you mentioned nurses, they wear masks.

Otherwise I suppose I need to read more about long covid. However, a lot of the symptoms sound like a lot of other things, like depression or lupus or Lyme disease. I'll take a look at your links in a bit and will be curious to see how it's diagnosed vs other things. Regardless, I still believe there isn't much we can do given cost, inconvenience and everyone longing for a sense of normalcy even still, agree to disagree on that I guess.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

N95s can be reused to reduce cost. Cycle through 5 masks so that each mask sits for 4 days between uses. Throw away if it gets wet, becomes hard to breathe through, is visibly dirty, or will no longer fit tightly.

Air purifiers aren't enough to protect people, but they're a simple passive solution that would impact infection rates for a population that largely doesn't want to mask. Few people mask at my workplace. And air purification will help will all other sorts of disease, including helping us be resilient to the next pandemic, because it's a when and not an if. You mentioned often being sick with non-COVID colds and flus. Even if it's not a complete protection, wouldn't it be nice to be sick 20% less? Your community has a major source of disease transmission right there that they could reduce.

We should be coming out of COVID better prepared, instead we're even worse off.

[–] paf0@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm not often sick, I have had maybe five colds in the last two years. Pretty standard when you have small children and not nearly as bad as when they were in daycare prior to covid.

I find you incredibly unreasonable. Enjoy your bunker and be well.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Flu and other regular seasonal illnesses also carry the risk of long-term health consequences. People focus on "long covid" because it's new, but chronic health issues resulting from illnesses to which we are accustomed typically don't even merit conversation let alone the sort of protocols suggested by some for covid. It used to simply be called "post-infectious syndrome" or "myalgic encephalomyelitis syndrome."

I guess it's not surprising that there is an equal and opposite ideology to antivaxxers, but I do find them just about equal in terms of intractibility and unreasonableness. Two extreme and unrealistic views bunkered in silos of their own creation.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What completely braindead comparison. Cold and seasonal illnesses do not have remotely the same rate of severe long term issues as COVID. People also sometime got lasting diseases from stubbed toes, it doesn't make it comparable to COVID. You don't have 3-7% incidence rate for colds resulting in symptoms lasting two months and impacting daily life.

The enlightened centrism comparing antivaxxers to actual scientists is just the cherry on top.