henfredemars

It would be so much more convenient for the both of us, and then he could go outside, anywhere, whenever he likes.

I wonder how many thousands of spam bots have tried to connect to the servers and send email using text ripped from these pages federated across numerous domains.

And they can’t just block one website. They’d have to individually block every node if they want to crawl the web for email addresses to steal. I hope it’s a real thorn in their side.

You’re indoors in the sense that you’re protected from the weather and the elements, and the cave could even have some kind of covering or entrance area that could be considered a door or doorway. People have built homes in caves.

Is caving an outside, inside activity?

Almost a month without a new post? Can’t have that. Have a cute clip!

I really don't want to go into work tomorrow.

Been thinking about giving it another go just for some casual fun. I read that the developers still maintain it and the little silly animations are adorable.

Is it a good game? Not really, but it's cute.

Please excuse the YouTube link as I understand it's taboo around here, but I can't stop giggling at that animation and this community can always use more love.

Source: https://www.derpibooru.org/images/3258472

Google claims that privacy is a priority, and perhaps it is, but we can't deny there's an essential conflict of interest between protecting your privacy and Google being an advertising company.

Recent events in this space include Google's new Ad Topics framework, which purports to offer users more control. I feel it's an improvement over cookies, but having my device participate in tracking me is backwards. After all, my device should be protecting my privacy first, not implementing features to track my behavior.

Data "nutrition labels" in the Play Store are a step forward by encouraging proactively a discussion about how user data is processed and used. On the other hand, recent attempts at DRM for the web in Chrome remind us that the main vendor behind Android doesn't always have user interests at heart.

Is Android doing enough to keep your data safe? If not, what steps could reasonably improve the situation?

In sharing your opinion, please take care to distinguish between Google the company and Android the product. While related, given Google may have privacy issues in one line of business doesn't necessarily define privacy practices on the Android platform. Also, another interesting angle includes what's best for you versus what's best for users as a whole. For example, a privacy feature, to be successful, needs to be reasonably understandable by most users and offer a net benefit without complicating the platform for casual users.

Discussion from here: https://lemmy.ml/post/1895271

Relevance: Infosec.pub may wish to consider defederation temporarily.

Temporary fix in place, but instances remain vulnerable. Post: https://lemmy.world/post/1290412

• UPDATE 2:58 UTC the injected code was removed from the main page, but cleanup efforts are still underway.
• UPDATE 3:11 UTC situation appears to be under control, but browse with caution.
• UPDATE 3:35 UTC main page exploited again! Website is unsafe.
• UPDATE 4:01 UTC reports coming in that other instances are getting owned. One report of comments trying to inject JavaScript into the page.
• UPDATE 4:13 UTC XSS vulnerability in page sidebar is reported relationship to the event is unknown.
• UPDATE 7:17 UTC Root cause was identified a while ago.