this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
376 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

5380 readers
2379 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
Rooki@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
rjc@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
376
Hello Darkness My Old Friend (slrpnk.net)
submitted 2 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The owner, Bezos, forced the editorial staff to not publish an endorsement of Harris

The editorial staff are in more or less open revolt, and large numbers of subscribers have canceled their subscriptions and committed to not buying from Amazon.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 114 points 2 days ago (1 children)

An independent newspaper might someday choose to back away from making presidential endorsements. But this isn’t the right moment, when one candidate is advocating positions that directly threaten freedom of the press and the values of the Constitution.

Beautifully put.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Makes me hope even more that Harris will tax these fuckers into oblivion. Nobody should be a billionaire period. And wealthy individuals shouldn’t have enough power to be able to impact elections.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I'm having trouble being outraged by a robber-Barron trying to influence American politics by controlling a media outlet, because to do so would imply that that is outside the norm or unusual in some way.

This isn't even recent. We once occupied the Philippines and continue to occupy Guantanamo Bay behind the yellow journalism of rich cunt newspapermen Herst and Pulitzer who were in a competition to out lie each other, that was 1898.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So the endorsement ban publicized their stance even more widely. I don't even know whom any other newspaper endorsed.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I know who the LA Times endorsed. (Exact same thing happened there.)

[–] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Strong worded letter again. As long as they still come to work tomorrow, Bezos can use them as he likes.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There have already been resignations over it. Not quite sure how many

[–] grue@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

Instead of resigning individually, they should strike collectively.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

It’s got to start somewhere, and it usually starts small. Let’s focus on building up the momentum, so that little snowball turns into an avalanche.

[–] ahornsirup 11 points 2 days ago

You can't blame people for needing a job. They probably don't exactly have a choice other than to keep working.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh that’s good.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 days ago

If a couple percent of the population stops shopping there, Amazon will miss it's quarterly numbers and the stock price will fall sharply.

[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not like Bezos is there running anything day to day. Management could ignore him, say OK sure thing boss, and print it anyway. What's he gonna do? Fire them? 🤷

[–] ech@lemm.ee 33 points 2 days ago

What’s he gonna do? Fire them? 🤷

...yes.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Did WaPo change their byline to this, or is this OP satire?