funnystuff97

joined 1 year ago
[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (18 children)

If ther's on thing I hat, it's words ending with silent e's. And whil we'r at it, we ned to get rid of doubl e's as well.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well I'm currently playing Armored Core 6, and I gotta hand it to em, there's basically no story whatsoever. It's just giant robots. And it's pretty fantastic.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Currently playing Armored Core 6 with a Steam Controller, and I love it. But... the right track pad leaves a lot to be desired.

The best aspect of the Steam Controller, without a doubt, is the modularity and shareability of it. The standard control scheme a game tries to assume, most of the time it stinks. But being able to browse through community-made control schemes and finding one that works for me is fantastic. The highest downloaded control scheme for AC6 got me 95% of the way there; I just had to change the bindings of the back pedals to suit me. Now it uses the track pad and the gyro in conjunction-- track pad for big sweeping movements and gyro for small adjustments-- and I love it.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

I've said this before, but Factorio is genuinely the only thing that has made me lose track of time before. When I'm goofing off into the wee hours of the night, normally I have a vague sense of time passing. I won't know what time it is, but I'll know that it's late and I should probably stop whatever it is I'm doing (and won't). And then I'll look at the clock and it's 2am-- late, but not surprising.

But then came Factorio. This was when I first started playing, around the time I just started making black science packs. I was refitting my bases to work with laser turrets, and making minor modifications here and there like upgrading from 2 saturated belts of iron to 4 and such. Nothing major. I'd just do these things, maybe an hour or two, and head to bed. So you can imagine my surprise when I look at the clock and it was 5:30 AM. I was baffled; I had no idea I'd spent that long modifying my base. Like 7 hours straight, no breaks. And then the exhaustion hit, and I saved and went immediately to bed.

Cracktorio man, the addiction is real.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why do the small beings simply not travel atop the winged creatures to the molten rock?

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If that ain't the truth. Moved across the state to find work, and obviously my old buddies can't invite me to as many things anymore. But seeing them all on a call together playing video games without even a heads up hurts a smidge.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

🗣🔥🔥🔥🔥

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

upvote for VA-11 HALL-A

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It makes more sense to me because, when binomials are taught, it's usually in the form of a variable and a constant.

E.G. a = x, b = 3: (x + 3)^2. When expanded, that's usually x^2 + 6x + 9, and not x^2 + 9 + 6x.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If you go during non-peak days and have a general game plan, it's not that bad. You can get a good amount of ride time going if you time your Fastpasses (they're free) good enough.

The pricetag, though, that's on you to decide. I like going, but I wouldn't go more than, like, once... a decade.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

A cache is not a stack, it's memory stored in parallel cells. The CPU could theoretically, depending on the implementation, directly find the data it's looking for by going to the address of the cell it remembers that it's in.

Not all L1 caches operate the same, but in almost all cases, it's easy to actually go and get the data no matter where it physically is. If the data is at address 0 or at address 512, they both take the same time to fetch. The problem is if you don't know where the data is, in which case you have to use heuristics to guess where it might be, or in the worst case check absolutely everywhere in the cache only to find it at the very last place... or the data isn't there at all. In which case you'd check L2 cache, or RAM. The whole purpose of a cache is to randomly store data there that the CPU thinks it might need again in the future, so fast access is key. And in the most ideal case, it could theoretically be done in O(1).

ETA: I don't personally work with CPUs so I could be very wrong, but I have taken a few CPU architecture classes.

[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (8 children)

i think that's the point, it's not a "messy pile", it's actually a completely organized cache; depending on the replacement policy it can appear messy, but you keep the offset and address stored locally for fast access and more hits (i remember that i put some arguably clean socks somewhere in the corner over there)

 

I mostly use c:geo, which shows caches that a free Geocache account on the official app won't, except Premium-only caches, which are designated by the cache owner. (That is to say, the official Geocache app won't show free accounts caches above a certain difficulty/terrain, but you can find them online, and there's no way at all for a free account to find premium-only caches.)

I'm sure most of you already knew that though. For those of you who currently pay for premium or have paid in the past, did you think it is/was worth it? $40 USD a year doesn't seem like that much, but I'm mostly against all kinds of subscription models across the board. I've been told that a majority of caches are Premium-only, but I have no way to determine if there are a significant number of Premium-only caches around me, so I can't make any informed decisions in that regard.

So, what are your thoughts? Worth buying, or worth sticking to a free account?

view more: next ›