That's politics: one side tries to do the right thing and manage to get law written. The other side then hire lawyers to find a way to bypass this law. A judge get to choose who wins until the next law is voted. It means the first law wasn't well written in the first place.
bouh
joined 1 year ago
That is totally right. I'm french. Laws protect renters, but not that much, and landlords don't hesitate to threaten with false pretense. And if you mention anything illegal they're doing, you simply won't have the apartment. They ask documents they have no right to see, but if you don't provide them they won't even look at your application. Obviously people of colour do have a harder time finding an apartment, but even for engineers it's hard to find one in a city.
In France you need to earn 3 times the price of the lawn, and you need warrants (garants) : people who will be forced to pay if you ever don't. To prove you can pay, you need 3 months of salary sheets. You need to prove your job is not a CDD (short determined time). You need to show insurances and prove your identity too of course. Half of those are not legal, but landlords don't care because you're in competition : you visit the apartment with a dozen of other people who want a place to sleep too. And the landlord will choose the chosen one as he pleases.
It depends on the place, but Lyon is absolute madness to find an apartment.
And yet most of the political forces in France are advocating to remove all these rights. Sindicalists are arrested under terrorist laws, as are eco-activists. And maires trying to enforce price ceiling for lawns in cities are considered like Staline.
C'est complètement faux. C'était le cas lors de la précédente législature. Ce n'est absolument plus le cas aujourd'hui. Leur seul pour aujourd'hui, c'est un pouvoir de nuisance au sénat.
Les faiseurs de roi aujourd'hui, c'est la macronie. Et Macron ne sait pas jouer ce jeu. Il ne sait jouer que Jupiter. C'est pour ça qu'il demande une coalition qui aura la majorité absolue : avec cette règle sortie du chapeau, il force une coalition avec le macronie où celle-ci aurait forcément l'avantage, surtout si on ajoute la règle lfi est exclue.
J'ai du mal à comprendre dans quel monde LR sera solidaire de Macron. Le tier de LR a viré au RN déjà, et la dissolution à été décidée parce que LR prévoyait supposément une motion de censure.
Je veux bien qu'on dise que la macronie est à droite, mais insinuer qu'ils sont solidaires de LR c'est de la désinformation.
La vraie question, c'est qui veut d'une élection présidentielle 3 ans en avance, et qui est satisfait de Macron. Pour la seconde question, raisonnablement personne. Pour la première, tout dépend des guerres de succession à droite et au centre gauche. Ou autrement dit, comment la macronie va exploser et qui y est prêt ?
Vesper. It is imo a good sci-fi movie, but a tough one. The lives of the characters are not easy, but the movie doesn't tell you that, you discover it through details casually said by the characters. The movie itself is a post apocalyptic movie in a very original setting. It is about biotechnology instead mechanised or AI tech. It is worth it for this alone IMO. It was a great movie imo, but not one to cheer up.
Mensonge. Les hypothèses de croissance du COR il y en a plusieurs pour commencer, et elles sont toutes plus raisonnables que celles choisit par B Lemaire pour ses budgets depuis 7 ans.
Ça m'a l'air faux ça. Le COR expliquait en janvier que le système de retraite n'est pas en danger en France. Et c'est leur travail de vérifier ça.
I've heard rumors of a planned attack against Ukraine in this region. This move prevents it.
As other said, it also makes Putin look like a clown, increase the cost of the war for Russia (they have their own refugees now who will spread the word of how Russia is invaded for the first time since ww2), allows to take prisoners and equipment, give control over a gas pipeline so they can pressure Austria and Hungary, forces Russia to move troups and equipment away from the Dombass, improves the moral in Ukraine with victories and humiliating Russia.
Strategically, the only drawback for Ukraine is that they are in a position of invading force in some way, which may make some allies or international opinions a bit uncomfortable. But the whole list of positives has the potential to change the war.
I don't think you get my point. Sure, you did educate your children the best you could, and for the best goal of humanism. But you did so beside your society. That means that, at your core, you believe you are better than your society, AND you think your children are better learned OUT of it.
This is individualism at its core. You go the lone wolf path if it means it can ensure the better for your own tribe. At the expense of the society as a whole.
This is a self feeding cycle. Society will get worse and worse while some lineages of individuals will get better. That's how the liberal neo-feudalism is born.
I'm not blaming you. You do what you think is the best for your children in a society that pushes for this choice with all its strength. I'm merely trying to explain where it leads.
So as long as the litteral nazis are not in charge genociding people it's fine and there's nothing to worry about? Syndicalistes and ecoactivists being arrested for terrorism is fine already?