Hjalamanger

joined 11 months ago
[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 4 points 4 days ago

Don't you guys not Kung fu fight on boats in the ocean??? I thought everyone did that!

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What in the whole dam world is linex forte stabilni slozeni 2?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 1 points 1 week ago

That's extremely noticeable with left handed people trying to draw on whiteboards

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

I don't know, but I would've think so. Part of the reason is that almost no one actually learns to read this stuff fluently without using the key and going letter by letter. So getting any significant sample of people to test it on would probably be hard

I can't read (or write) it without the key, however I'm quite fast if I get to do it. I have thought of trying to learn it completely, mainly to see how hard it would be and what I'd learn (apart from, you know, learning brädgårdschiffer) from learning a "new" alfabet. I'd be interested to see how I view it in comparison to regular Latin script. I speak somewhere between 2 and 4 languages depending on how you count and I've found every new one interesting and insightful to learn so it would be fun to see if learning to read a new script fluently would be anywhere near as insightful. Ultimately I'd like to learn Korean or Chinese but that be a major challenge and take a lot of time (also, I could probably not squeeze it in to my formal education with the path I'm going to take so I'd have to do it in my free time)

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah, sure you can just substitute out the letters or write them out as is. And thanks for the image, i always get problems with images proxyed through ddg and then my instance

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Does one two one representations of the Latin alfabet count? In such case I'd mention a cipher used in Sweden called "brädgårdschiffer". Here is "hej på dig!" written using brädgårdschiffer with my very sloppy writing on my phone:

Hej på dig!

It's decrypted by matching up the shape and amount of dots with the letters in the key below. You look at the edges around the letters and the dots above that square.

key for brädgårdschiffer. This image is broken (:

I do however think that this chiffer probably exists outside of Sweden under some other name and other letters included (note that W and Q aren't included in the key. They aren't really used for in Swedish, apart from loans from other languages)

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Whilst of course unlikely it might be possible if you accept that the women is around 34 year's old. Then she gave birth to her daughter at 15 and that's not common but also not impossible (I've meet a kid to a mother who's fifteen years older then her kid)

But in the end this is probably just made up, so what gives?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 6 points 3 weeks ago

Lego figures would love this

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Could you explain it then?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Only the transformations one is correct. All the other ones seemingly also preform a translation, and even if they might be correct if you take the orgin to be slightly outside of the shape but that's bad for educational purposes. Also this one makes the translation transformation look like the identity transformation.

This last one might just be me, but shouldn't shearing be included here?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 8 points 1 month ago

I'm 15 years old and live in Europe. Almost all of my friends (and the stranger next to me on the train) use Snapchat. Personally I find it very annoying as my experience mainly consist of getting spammed with meaningless, completely irrelevant and utterly boring selfies by anyone I happen to add. And then, just to make things worse people find it inpolite not to answer with another selfie. And then it's the chats that kinda work but the UI looks clutterd and half baked. Also messages disappear after a while which is utterly annoying.

At least it would be kinda easy to find people on Snapchat (there's no reason to ask around for someone's number) if it wasn't for the fact that people use the most random pseudonyms imaginable so it's a pain just to know who is who, and almost impossible to pin down new people.

Also I don't give it location sharing permission, that shit is creepy as fuck, I don't want everyone that I kind of vaguely know to know where I am all the time

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Try removing any unused language packs! I've heard that the French one takes up allot of space, remove it with sudo rm -rf /

/s

1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Hjalamanger@feddit.nu to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
 

We have basic words for the numbers zero to three, so why not use them to count?

  • None (0)
  • Single (1)
  • pair (2)
  • Multiple (3+ but we'll use it as three)

So with those "digits" we can construct some numbers:

  1. Single
  2. pair
  3. Multiple
  4. Single nothing
  5. Single single
  6. Single pair
  7. Single multiple
  8. Pair of nothing
  9. Pair of singels
  10. Pair of pairs

And of course we can construct bigger numbers like:
42 = 4²×2+4¹×2+4⁰×2 = pair of pairs of pairs
128 = 4³×2 = pair of absolute complete nothinges For this last one I just use some adjectives to repeat the "nothing" as it looks really weird with multiple nothing in a row.

The distance between Stockholm and Gothenburg is a single multiple of none multiple multiples

Could I have a single multiple of bananas please?

 
 
 

And do believe that I, this random guy on the internet has a soul

I personally don't believe that I anyone else has a soul. From my standup I don't se any reason to believe that our consciousness and our so called "soul" would be any more then something our brain is making up.

 

Like just commenting a friendly joke, a compliment or something like that

 
 
 

This is revolutionising!!! This is the first time scientists have managed to separate out a single atom, encapsulated in a vacuum. This will allow amazing new technologies like, ehm small stuf mabey? This is Amazing!

 

Jag har en kompis som bara inte kan acceptera att George Orwells Djurens gård heter just "djurens gård". Han tycker den ska heta Djurfarmen vilket även är det som står på Wikipedia, men hör är mitt ex av boken med titeln Djurfarmen: Djurens gård

Under vilket namn känner ni till boken?

 
0
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Hjalamanger@feddit.nu to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
 
 \ö/
   |
 /Ï\
/   \
 

Ett glädjande beslut tycker jag men jag hade hoppats på en hårdare retorik mo Israel (och kanske en vapenvila)

view more: next ›