this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
-25 points (31.9% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3567 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah - I'm calling bullshit at this point.

This isn't reporting - it's just flogging a narrative.

And I say that as someone who argued for Biden dropping out.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why?

This is how these things happen. You're viewing it as just political, but for these campaign workers, it's a lot closer.

They didn't just realize Biden was bad. This has been an open an obvious secret for them for a long time. And the dam has finally broken and people are talking

Everytime someone talks, more people feel comfortable talking.

There's no way to stop it once it starts except getting in front of it. The longer Biden waits and the more talk. The more it hurts the party

Trust is eroding and there wasn't much in the party to begin with

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If its new/ people keep repeating it, its news-worthy.

If its reposting/ rehashing last weeks news, then it deserves downvotes.

If you are sick of hearing the news, maybe log out, take a break.

But the news is what the news is.

[–] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you mean? Like, you don't actually think campaign aids said these things?

Not sure what flogging a narrative really means

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Flogging a narrative - someone has a vested interest not just in promoting a particular idea or position, but in communicating the idea that there's a broad consensus for that idea or position. That's the "narrative."

For whatever reason (generally simply that that broad consensus doesn't exist), they can't simply report that some significant majority of people support the idea or position. So instead, they publish an anecdotal example of it - this particular person, who's notable for whatever reason, supports it. Then the next day, they publish another. Then another. Then another. Then another.

The goal is simply to repeat the same idea enough times that people who aren't really paying much attention will come to think that it must be a notably popular position, since they keep seeing it mentioned.

I have no doubt that an aide said what 's being reported. And I also have no doubt that a determined enough reporter could come up with pretty much any idea at all - for instance, that Kraft macaroni and cheese is the best food ever - then find some aide somewhere who would go on record saying it.

[–] sartalon@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Stop feeding the trolls

[–] Oofnik@kbin.earth -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm so tired of people on Lemmy/kbin downvoting news because it doesn't support their narrative. Like argue all you want about Biden staying in the race, that's great and fine. But do you think trying to suppress news of people's legitimate doubts is really the way to win an election?

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There is a concerted foreign effort to manipulate the election.

We all know some people don't want Biden again and we know the reasons.

Posting 30 some links a day of people saying the same thing isn't news, it isn't informative, and it isn't useful.

I don't doubt some people are saying it. But the effort is being made to make it sound like the DNC is suppressing a rebellion when that isn't at all what's happening.

We do not have other candidates ready. In the last four years, not one person in the party tried to make themselves the successor.

We have the No Labels guy and the Brain Worms guy. No serious candidates have stepped forward.

So unless this endless tide of hand wringing has a plan, it's fucking useless.

As such, I do not believe mamy party insiders are trying to tank their candidate. This is foreign influence to demoralize the left, specifically to get the 'Bernie Bro' crowd to stay home because the DNC betrayed them again.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Man, I was with you until Dem Congresscritters started making public statements. This is a very abnormal situation. You don't make public statements like that unless the private channels have been tried and everything is truly fucked.

Fact is that the foreign campaign to demoralize voters against Trump will continue - and it WILL use this opportunity for all its worth - but that's not the same as saying that this isn't a real and significant issue that's come to fore.