this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
206 points (96.8% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2711 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Japan’s English proficiency ranking dropped to 92nd out of 116 countries, the lowest ever recorded.

The decline is attributed to stagnant English proficiency among young people, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Netherlands ranked first, followed by European countries, while the Philippines and Malaysia ranked 22nd and 26th, respectively.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PDiddyDo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Japan's PM gas responded to the report "We are velly solly"

[–] Hupf 0 points 1 hour ago

Rookie mistake. They should have surveyed the country's Engrish proficiency.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 9 points 10 hours ago

I love that we have hundred people saying that English is the past and irrelevant... Needing to use English to share that though.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Makes me wonder what America's or England's proficiency in Japanese is.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

English classes are required (I think from elementary school as of a few years ago) but, from talking to a lot of teachers in my time here, the actual teachers just use the English speakers they bring over here to parrot phrases and won't let them actually correct things like pronunciation in a lot of cases. I know many Japanese who think the whole program (JET) is a waste, and I'm inclined to agree in its current state.

Japan is like 98.5% Japanese the last time I looked it up. English is completely unnecessary in Japan outside of some very specific jobs and on certain entrance exams (which are also just there for the sake of the test). If a child doesn't want to learn and the quality of the education is lacking, even with all the money dumped into it, it's useless. Back during the bubble economy ending in the '90s it may have been different, but job prospects requiring English outside of hospitality, tourism, and some specific medical and government jobs are non-existent. Even then, it often makes more sense to use a translator or to keep one on staff.

Japan either needs to get serious about its English education or just stop wasting money on an ineffective program and focus resources into classes or schools to develop people who actually want to learn. I say this as someone whose taxes fund it.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I was reading the book by Chris Broad of the Travel Abroad YouTube about his experience teaching in Japan. You're totally correct. It's really a faux pas to correct a teacher as a foreigner teaching English. So the teacher would give say the wrong thing, and you'd just nod.

Not to mention, from Chris, the Japanese tests for English are really stupid. They're teaching them with tests from the 80s, and using words that aren't common in spoken language.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 16 hours ago

I've seen uni entrance exam tests and it's definitely just there for the test -- no one speaks the way they do in those. I was never a teacher, though, so I'm just going on what my friends say (my wife hated English class and never paid attention, so she doesn't remember much).

To be fair, the JLPT also tends to include outdated Japanese, so there's that as well.

[–] Firipu@startrek.website 1 points 14 hours ago

Half the foreigners survive on the shitty education system though. No need to organize mass deportations in Japan. Just stop English education and 50% of white guys are gone instantly.

[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Which is ironic given how many English loanwords have infiltrated the language in recent times, to the point where sometimes I hear Japanese speak in a not overly formal context and half of the words they say are just English words with Japanese pronunciation.

[–] mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Same in Pakistan. People tend to use a lot of English words in Urdu, even when an equivalent native word exists. For example, the proper way to say "What's the time?" is "کیا وقت ہوا ہے؟" ("kiya waqat hawa hay?"). But a lot of people will say "کیا ٹائم ہے؟" ("kiya time hay?") instead. But of course, there are also loanwords such as "واشنگ مشین" (washing machine) and "کمپیوٹر" (computer).

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 4 points 17 hours ago

Loans from French (either old French or Norman French, some borrowed into/from Latin on either side) comprise a huge amount of English vocab. Does that mean we speak French?

(yes, I know there's a video out there arguing that English is just bad/weird French and no I don't agree with it).

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Having learned both english and now in the process of learning Japanese, katakana English is so confusing sometimes. It's kind of correct when you don't think about what's actually written, but you sometimes have to think long to understand that an エアコン (eakon) is just an air con(dition).

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 17 hours ago

It gets easier and I agree with saying it aloud. Once you start getting used to patterns, you can decipher them more easily (at least the ones from a language you speak). Remember no diphthongs and each syllable gets one beat.

My pet theory is that it's also how the infamous "No Smorking" Engrish came about in reverse. The 'o' in smoking tends to sound long and a lot of times words that sound like that to the Japanese from English will be (long-sounding vowel)+r.

[–] Woht24@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I always found saying katakana out loud made me understand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True. Also doesn't help when you sometimes mix up シ(shi) and ツ (tsu) because the font (or someone else's handwriting) makes them look very similar.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 17 hours ago

Alignment/starting position is the key. The "-like strokes in shi are left-aligned, the "-like ones in tsu are top-aligned. Same for 'so' and 'n'. This is why people talk about stroke order being important (although in this case it's not simply the order).

[–] Badland9085@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Having lots of loaned words don’t mean much when English and Japanese have vastly different grammatical structures. There are also lots of non-English loaned words in Japanese, and from experience, the Japanese don’t always know which language a word is borrowed from, nor should the speakers of the language really need to care. In any case, grammar makes up an important part of a language, though it doesn’t come for free if you aren’t already exposed to the grammatical structure before.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago (4 children)

tbf, the Japanese proficiency of English-speaking nations is probably lower.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is a tricky language. Almost nothing in common with Indo-European languages except loan words. Completely different grammatical structure. Three different writing scripts.

At least the pronunciation isn't too bad coming from English as all the usual sounds are represented within our phonology. Compared to Spanish rolling R's, Russian and Arabic consonant clusters, Chinese tonality, and other difficult to pronounce languages.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 20 points 1 day ago (12 children)

as all the usual sounds are represented within our phonology

Is what you'd think, but nope. Their r, sh, j, ch and w and u sounds are slightly different from English (enough so that some languages have the English version and the Japanese version as independent sounds), the lone n consonant has a pronunciation not existent in English, and Japanese has a tone system but it's simple enough a foreigner can get by without knowing it. That is to say, Japanese pronunciation is very different from English and decently hard to master, but if you just pronounce it like you would English (without stress of course, absolutely don't add stress) you shouldn't have a problem getting your point across.

Russian and Arabic consonant clusters

Wait Arabic consonant clusters? If anything Arabic has less consonant clusters than English. As a native Arabic speaker what I would think is a problem for English natives is the consonants themselves, because we have a lot of them and many don't exist in English.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

I've never been able to hear a difference with the ch, sh, j, or w. Is there anything that lays out the differences? I've basically given up on feeling like I'll ever be totally comfortable in the language anyway.

Oh, and don't forget the f sound is also different from English. At least the vowels are pretty easy to transition to

[–] loppy@fedia.io 3 points 17 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_phonology

Go to the Consonants section. There are lots of useful notes there, and you can also click on the individual consonants for more information, including how to configure your mouth to make the sound. "ch" and "sh" are tɕ and ɕ, "j" is dʑ at the beginning of utterances or after ん and is ʑ after a vowel, "w" is w.

Compare to English under the Phonemes section. "ch" and "sh" are tʃ and ʃ, "j" is dʒ, "w" is w.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Is there anything that lays out the differences?

I'm not sure if they're neatly explained somewhere, but the short of it is that sh, j and ch are "smoother" than the English versiond. They're literally just s, z and t respectively, with an i next to them and smoothed over for ease of pronunciation because otherwise it's a pain to say "si" (languages that do have this sound, like English, have ways of coping with this, but Japanese doesn't). In English the equivalent of this is how drink is actually djrink and two becomes chuu, but anyway the point is that thinking of these three sounds as coping mechanisms rather than independent sounds should help. Listen carefully to a Japanese shi and you'll hear the remnants of an s in it. You'll probably have some luck looking these sounds up on YouTube.

W is a bit simpler; it's just uw instead of a plain W, in the same way the English version lets out a bit of air before the W itself. Just insert a small u before watashi to make it uwatashi and you'll get pretty close. Again YT should help. BTW to help appreciate the difference, when the Japanese try to emulate the English W sound they add a ho first, as in howaito (white).

I've basically given up on feeling like I'll ever be totally comfortable in the language anyway.

My strategy is watch tons of anime (or your Japanese media of choice) with English subtitles. As long as you don't depend completely on the subtitles and try to listen to the words being said it's a pretty effective way of learning the language in my experience. Simple manga (or, again, your Japanese written media of choice) also does wonders.

Edit: A bunch of stuff here is wrong, see below.

[–] loppy@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The stuff about "w" is wrong, but there's a good reason you would think this. The lip shape for the "w" sound in English and Japanese is different; in English the shape is like English "u", and in Japanese the shape is like Japanese "u", but you definitely shouldn't have an actual "u" sound.

in the same way the English version lets out a bit of air before the W itself.

I think, especially considering your comment about ホワイト howaito, that you're confusing two things. There are English dialects which have two separate "w"-like sounds, one of which is typically written "wh" and the other "w". (To my ear, this distinctiln also sounds old-fashioned.) In these dialects, "w" as in "water" and "wood" is pronounced like you would expect, whereas "wh" as in "who" and "what" is pronounced somewhat like an "h" sound followed by just-"w" sound. I don't think the "wh" sound is used for all instances of "w" in any dialect; in fact, most dialects have just the "w" sound.

BTW to help appreciate the difference, when the Japanese try to emulate the English W sound they add a ho first, as in howaito (white).

This is false, they only do this for "wh" sounds (and maybe not even for all of them). Counterexamples to your claim are easy: ウェイトレス weitoresu = waitress, ワット watto = watt, etc.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 hours ago

That... Is all true. I guess I was basically spreading misinformation.

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Pitch accent isn't a tone system, also ん can he pronounced in way too many ways.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brasil is higher than Japan?? It's Japan that don't care to learn English because they can do "everything" in their country without the need to know english?

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Is it really that surprising? If you've ever played a video game before, you'd know that pretty much every Brazilian speaks English.

[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Here is the link to the report. It wasn’t in the article.

https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi/

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›