this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
187 points (93.1% liked)

solarpunk memes

2867 readers
857 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Left: Regular green energy.

Right: Glowing green energy.

[–] ecoenginefutures@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

Exactly 😂😂

[–] denaggels 4 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Do we have a solution for nuclear waste yet?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Reprocess it, salvage useful isotopes for known uses, keep a few others for research purposes, don't put it too far away because most of it could be useful in the future.

[–] denaggels 3 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Afaik that is not an economically viable option.

[–] Fosheze@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

France literally does that. They reprocess 96% all of their used fuel back into usable fuel and useful materials.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Ah yes, economically viable like destroying the planet.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 hours ago

Which part? France is basically doing this already.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Do we have a solution for atmospheric CO2 release yet?

[–] Elwynn@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 hours ago

Permanent underground storage where it will naturally decay. Are a couple of different methods available from what I understand. And the amount of material that actually needs to be stored is a fraction of what is instead released into the air, water & soil from fossil based fuel. Not to mention toxins like mercury etc.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Do we have a problem with nuclear waste yet?

[–] denaggels 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

Define problem, because it's less waste than old solar panels per megawatt. Both of which we just throw away in special places designed specifically for that waste.

[–] Johanno 6 points 7 hours ago

Eat it! So many calories. You will never have to eat again.

[–] felykiosa@sh.itjust.works 29 points 14 hours ago

Nowv kiss🥰🥰. More seriously I don't understand this nonsense of make fighting two great solution that help to stop the use of fossil fuel industry. Plus they are complementary since we can't store great amount of energy and solar and turbine are intermittent energies

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 75 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t give a shit at this point. Just stop with the fossil fuels. Whatever it takes. If employing a team of white working class farmer astronauts to run in a hamster wheel is more politically palatable then let’s fucking do it.

[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 hours ago

It feels like we are either approaching, or have reached, a point where going zero carbon and straight up dumping unprotected nuclear waste in a population center would lead to less suffering and misery than our current trajectory. Obviously that's not necessary or even possible, but that the situation we are in is extremely bleak and fixing it at this point probably requires a level of ice cold motherfuckerness we've never reckoned with.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

employing a team of white working class farmer astronauts to run in a hamster wheel

They're engineers and technicians, but I see you're already familiar with the Canadian nuclear power industry. "Hide and seek for a grand a week, or stand in plain view for two"

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

If nuclear helps us phase out fossil fuels quicker than I fully support it.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

The discussion should just be about either solar/wind/hydro or solar/wind/hydro/nuclear. Let’s start with the low hanging fruit and then keep discussing nuclear.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

It won’t, but it’ll help the longterm. We can tackle both longterm and short term goals at once.

What we absolutely shouldn’t be doing is engaging in protectionism, and banning imports of cheap solar panels. We don’t have time for that shit.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

At least where I live that's a big if. Nuclear in Australia is most often used by fossil fuel interests as a stalling tactic because of how long it would take to get up and running and how expensive it would be, compared to renewables.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 20 points 15 hours ago

Yet if they just did it, we'd have it by now. Any talking point is stalling at this stage.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 19 points 18 hours ago

¿Por que no los dos?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Wait are we supposed to agree with the guy on the left? Cos the last iteration of this meme I saw, the woman on the right (Summer?) was by far the more open-minded one. I just don't know this meme well enough.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 13 points 15 hours ago

It's two people having similar thoughts, don't read into it so much haha

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

Need CO2 line go down.