this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
115 points (96.7% liked)

World News

39067 readers
2478 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Nov 19 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden has approved provision of anti-personnel land mines to Ukraine, a U.S. official told Reuters, a step that could help slow Russian advances in its east, especially when used along with other munitions from the United States.

The United States expects Ukraine to use the mines in its own territory, though it has committed not to use them in areas populated with its own civilians, the official said. The Washington Post first reported the development.

The office of Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the Ukrainian defence ministry, the Russian defence ministry and the Kremlin did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests to comment.

The United States has provided Ukraine with anti-tank mines throughout its war with Russia, but the addition of anti-personnel mines aims at blunting the advance of Russian ground troops, the official added, speaking on condition of anonymity.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, how sweet, Ukraine is finally allowed to use the same tools Russia is.

Fuck's sake. All this pussyfooting from Cold War dinosaurs...

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Cheering for land mines. A new low even for you.

[–] superkret 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is what war does to people. We're cheering for landmines and nukes, and anyone who points out how utterly insane that is, is branded as supporting the enemy.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, remember how this war famously doesn't have anti-personnel landmines being widely used?

Oh? What's that? Russia is already widely using them in Ukrainian territory?

[–] einkorn 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am all in favour for handing Ukraine the tools they need to win this war. But at the same time "the others are doing it" is no justification for a free pass on every weapon or tactic.

The Russians butchered civilians, destroyed critical civilian infrastructure and yet I'd rather prefer the Ukrainians to not do the same.

Also anti personal mines and cluster munitions from i.e. the Vietnam war are still causing crippling and death today. Using weapons that are prone to cause damage to future generations for short term gains is in my opinion short sighted. We should provide Ukraine with more "sensible" weapons in quantities that makes using cluster munitions and mines obsolete.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I am all in favour for handing Ukraine the tools they need to win this war. But at the same time “the others are doing it” is no justification for a free pass on every weapon or tactic.

No, but neither is fighting with both hands behind their backs. Anti-personnel mines remain effective, especially considering Russia's preferred tactics. Ukraine already is being attacked with chemical weapons regularly, having PoWs tortured and executed, and their civilians murdered and their children quite literally kidnapped by the Russian state, and we're gonna draw the line at 'using landmines in non-civilian areas to stop Russian advances'?

Fuck that noise.

Also anti personal mines and cluster munitions from i.e. the Vietnam war are still causing crippling and death today.

Those were also used in very different contexts. Modern cluster munitions do not have the same long-term potential for damage that Vietnam-era munitions did, and the same with landmines - especially since landmine recording protocols were updated in part because of the haphazard way they were used in Vietnam. And, for that matter, we dropped more ordnance on Vietnam than was dropped in the entirety of WW2 by the Axis AND Allies combined, all over the country. The same is not going to happen in Ukraine, neither in scale nor in type. They want to prevent the Russians from advancing along the frontlines, and are not going to use them in civilian areas.

Using weapons that are prone to cause damage to future generations for short term gains is in my opinion short sighted.

How many thousands of Ukrainians dead, maimed, tortured, or ethnically cleansed today would you consider it an insufficient short-term gain to avert?

We should provide Ukraine with more “sensible” weapons in quantities that makes using cluster munitions and mines obsolete.

And what weapons are those? What weapons would make cluster munitions and mines obsolete in the context of the current war?

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the Russians don't want to step on mines they can just fuck off back into their borders.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The children also don't want to step on mines.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

They need to be alive in order to be able to step on mines though.

And if Russia where to win they are also safe because they will be deported to a nice childless family in Siberia for reeducation.

[–] neanderthal@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

speaking on condition of anonymity.

Meaning there is a good chance this information is classified because it lets Russia know to expect anti-personnel mines, which helps their war effort.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So landmines fucking suck, Really they shouldn't be used, maiming children and other random people for generations to come. Unfortunately they're also pretty damn effective, and with the US almost certainly pulling support for Ukraine next year the moral high ground doesn't mean much when you're dead.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

A little bit of perspective from Finland, as a neighbour of Russia. We have suffered from old landmines, so we are pretty familiar with the downsides. Finland joined the Ottawa Treaty in 2012. That has been largely seen as a mistake. If we would deploy mines in a new war, the locations would be documented well so that they could be disarmed with no harm to our civilians. And as a small country, we are not going to invade any other country and leave mines there after a war.

So there isn't really any benefit to our civilians. But we lost one cost effective way to defend against an aggressive neighbour who has superior numbers of people to send as cannon fodder.

[–] zante@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sub human scum.

The 1997 Ottawa Treaty banned the use of Land mine.

164 countries signed it.

The USA joined Russia, India and China in not signing it.

People who proliferate land mines will burn in hell fire.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sub human scum.

I might reserve terms like that for, say, the perpetrators of the Bucha massacre, or for those committing ethnic cleansing on a massive scale by kidnapping children. But hey, if you prefer to apply that term to Ukranians trying not to get murdered by fascist invaders, it's not like I can stop you.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

or how about this, both of them are terrible for this. i strongly support Ukraine's right to defend its borders, but landmines belong in the far distant pass. if Russia drops a bioweapon on kyiev will we follow suit? i sure fucking hope not.

grow a spine and actually believe in something for yourself. landmines are wrong, no matter who uses them or why they are used.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

i strongly support Ukraine’s right to defend its borders, but landmines belong in the far distant pass. if Russia drops a bioweapon on kyiev will we follow suit?

This may be shocking, but landmines and bioweapons are not even close to equivalent.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

i didn't say they were equivalent, i said they're both blights that remain in the past. terrible things that cause mass civilian casualties for decades after the conflict.

one can still be worse than the other, but anyone that uses them should be punished.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get China and Pakistan to sign it and India will sign it too.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

With the Hindu-nationalist Modi government in charge? Fat chance!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago

Can we approve unstoppable killer robot dogs as well? Also, I am really eager for Japan to start unveiling their fully armed, and operational Gundams. (I am not making light. I want to see Russia get fucked up.)