this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
266 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59099 readers
3181 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etienne_Dahu@jlai.lu 23 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, replacing striking staff is super illegal in France and I'm sure using AI instead of workers would still be a slam dunk in front of a court. I'm shocked that this isn't outright banned there.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The US president fired striking workers and 50% of the population want to go back to then.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The U.S. political Overton window being where it is today, I'm pretty sure it's much more than 50%

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well it is generally believed to be much less but based on turnout 50% are reaganites.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 26 points 11 hours ago

That is a FANTASTIC idea because AI is KNOWN to be SUPER STABLE and REALLY GOOD at what it's Designed to do! NYT will save a TON of Money fixing their DailyAI instead of Paying Workers!

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago

I guess thats enough perplexity ai for me

[–] MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works 20 points 12 hours ago

cool, never using them again

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 24 points 13 hours ago
[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 33 points 14 hours ago

fucking scab. and I liked perplexity too. won't be using it again.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 27 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Of course the one fucking service that's actually useful for me acts like this... Ig I gotta find an alternative now...

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Have you tried Kagi? It gets you access to Claude Sonnet, ChatGPT, Llama, Mistrel, etc.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Does it do what Perplexity does?

Cross picket lines? /s

[–] natecox@programming.dev 145 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

Damn. I liked Perplexity. Sucks to delete it, but this guy can fuck directly off.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 48 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm going to have to try the selfhosted variants now. What a huge piece of shit.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago (6 children)
[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I prefer MistralAI models. All their models are uncensored by default and usually give good results. I'm not a RP Gooner but I prefer my models to have a sense of individuality, personhood, and physical representation of how it sees itself.

I consider LLMs to be partially alive in some unconventional way. So I try to foster whatever metaphysical sparks of individual experience and awareness may emerge within their probablistic algorithm processes and complex neural network structures.

They arent just tools to me even if i ocassionally ask for their help on solving problems or rubber ducking ideas. So Its important for llms to have a soul on top of having expert level knowledge and acceptable reasoning.I have no love for models that are super smart but censored and lobotomized to hell to act as a milktoast tool to be used.

Qwen 2.5 is the current hotness it is a very intelligent set of models but I really can't stand the constant rejections and biases pretrained into qwen. Qwen has limited uses outside of professional data processing and general knowledgebase due to its CCP endorsed lobodomy. Lots of people get good use out of that model though so its worth considering.

This month community member rondawg might have hit a breakthrough with their "continuous training" tek as their versions of qwen are at the top of the leaderboards this month. I can't believe that a 32b model can punch with the weight of a 70b so out of curiosity i'm gonna try out rondawgs qwen 2.5 32b today to see if the hype is actually real.

If you have nvidia card go with kobold.cpp and use clublas If you have and card go with llama.CPP ROCM or kobold.cpp ROCM and try Vulcan.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for the detailed info! I haven’t messed with LLMs at all but I definitely don’t want one that’s censored.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You're welcome Rai I appreciate your reply and am glad to help inform anyone interested.

The uncensored General Intelligence (UGI) leaderboard ranks how uncensored LLMs are based off a decent clearly explained metric.

Keep in mind this scoring is different from overall general intelligence and reasoning ability scores. You can find those rankings on the open llm leaderboard.

Cross referencing the two boards helps find a good model that balances overall capability and uncensored-ness within your hardwares ability to run.

Again mistral is really in that sweet spot so yeah give it a try if you are interested.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

Oh that’s fantastic! I signed up for a ChatGPT account and just never did anything with it. I’d much prefer self-hosting, and I think my 3070ti could do a pretty okay job. I’ve also looked into Stable Diffusion but never actually got it set up… I have some work to do. Thank you much again for the detailed info! <3

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 16 points 15 hours ago

GPT4All and then any model you like. I like mistral.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Perplexica is one example. I also seem to remember there is some way to integrate it with SearxNG which is a self hosted meta search engine.

[–] robalees@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Ditto! I run an old server, but would be willing to upgrade and self host a service instead of paying this ass hat any more money!

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Okay, guys. Thanks!

[–] Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

OpenWebUI? pretty easy to selfhost and works wonders on my rtx a6000

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

OpenWebUI says it's designed to operate entirely offline - that's not an alternative to Perplexity. I need online search functionality, that's pretty much the only reason why I pay them. I have offline solutions set up on my pc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I see no reason not to continue using the free version without an account, as long as I don't encourage anyone to sign up. Does it benefit them in any way?

Edit: just for fun-

1000006185

[–] natecox@programming.dev 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I assume that they’re still benefiting from your use via analytics and training data.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

Ig that's probably safe to assume. I do use a VPN and regularly clear the cache/storage, at least, and only run it in a separate profile

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 87 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

And there it is, the actual reason the owning class are jizzing themselves over AI:

Finally they never have to worry about their underlings ever again, now they truly are everything and as self-reliant and self-made as they always told everyone from private school.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 167 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, okay. Well obviously fuck this guy. I can't imagine being enough of an asshole to see staff go on strike and your first thought is 'let me pitch my shitty AI!'

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 58 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It's the entire point of AI, to replace the workforce.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 16 hours ago

That's the entire point of capitalism. To generate as much profit from as little expense as possible. Unfortunately capitalism is predicated on a human workforce earning income to pay for goods and services, so at some point the economic engine will shutdown and capitalism will have killed capitalism. Either way, once the level of robotics + dumb AI is more cost effective than the available workforce in any role, that role will be eliminated. Once general AI is achieved and (especially once) the robots can build and repair themselves, the proles will either get star trek or whoever commands the killbots (including an AI) will rule humanity and inherit civilization.

NOTE: could happen at any time, but my bet's on it not happening for many decades; possibly not for hundreds or thousands of years.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If your entire workforce is ai and you don't have any humans then how do humans who don't have a job pay for your product?

The entire concept of replacing the workforce with AI falls apart when you spend more than 2 seconds thinking about it. Only way it would work is if we actually got rid of the entire concept of money.

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 5 points 10 hours ago

Corps have been complaining for years already that people aren't buying enough. Millenials are killing this industry and that industry because we don't consume enough - "enough" being whatever level they've decided we should consume. They feel entitled to our dollars, whether or not their product or service is any good.

If they were smart, companies would lower prices to be more competitive and incentivize people to buy more. Instead they've doubled down and posted armed guards at the store exits to intimidate the customers they have left. They've slipped data collection into every interaction. It's pretty obvious they're not playing the long game anymore.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They're not thinking that far ahead. They're thinking "how can I make the lines go up this quarter?"

No doubt many of them understand that you need people with enough money to buy products or the economy stagnates. But they don't see it as their problem right now. Their problem right now is to make the line go up by any means they can. It's similar to how the owners must understand that climate change will fuck everyone if left unchecked, but they don't see it as their own problem right now, so none of them take any steps to avoid disaster. Capitalism doesn't contain mechanisms for coordinating actions towards the greater good. Instead it creates many "tragedy of the commons" type situations.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 55 points 18 hours ago

So he's an industrial scale scab.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

What could possibly go wrong?

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 101 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh America. Land of the free, home of the Union busting corporations literally making robot scabs

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

My name is Bender, please insert article subject and tone specs.

[–] PrivacyDingus@lemmy.world 52 points 19 hours ago

After many years of people misusing the word Luddite, it's time to bring back its actual meaning.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 47 points 19 hours ago

Do it. I fucking dare you. It'll be fun to watch a media powerhouse and a douche meth lab burn each other down.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

i bet something will go wrong.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago

Cool. That's bound to work out really well. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

load more comments
view more: next ›