this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
1019 points (97.9% liked)

News

23310 readers
3500 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ahead of the 2024 election, Generation Z has sparked a trend on TikTok, “canceling out” family members’ votes by voting opposite their Trump-supporting relatives. Many young women post videos showing them voting for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris, contrasting with family members supporting Republican nominee Donald Trump.

Although Gen Z voters lean slightly toward Harris, a significant portion supports Trump. With over 47 million early votes cast, polls show a tight race, especially in key swing states.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Finally a great use of the word "cancel".

[–] don@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Smells like Gen Z spirit

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Huh. I thought young people never voted, so we could ignore their concerns.

Guess that was a fucking lie from people who just wanted to ignore young people's concerns.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It will take a while for us to get past the inertia of Boomers who have been gaslighting everyone for decades.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And centrists who don't want to listen to more progressive youngins.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The data doesn’t lie. People under 30 vote at embarrassingly lower rates than every other group.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do they vote for Democrats less than Republicans vote for Democrats? Because the party expends a fuckton of effort on trying to win over Republicans.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Fuck. Gen Z should not "lean slightly toward Harris", Gen Z should be an overwhelming progressive and inclusive force.

Fuck Twitter and TikTok that fried men's brains with shit like Andrew Tate and similar things.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I mean Harris and "progressive and inclusive" aren't necessarily one and the same, from the sounds of it it's Harris that should be pushing more progressive, but in the context of this election I agree they should be voting for Harris

[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't think you can blame Twitter and TikTok for that. People who like Tate's toxic masculinity incel garbage will find somewhere that feeds into their preferences.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago

I don't think this is necessarily true when talking about modern social media

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the following is my unscientific belief:

Social media algorithms are studied to make you see always the same kind of beliefs and everything opposing them is discouraged. They incentive inflammatory, divisive and hateful content in order to obtain more engagement, especially on Twitter.

If they used Mastodon or Lemmy, those people would be less tense.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they used Mastodon or Lemmy, those people would be less tense.

If they had more normies on it, maybe. But Lemmy seems to be composed primarily of the tensest people in the world to me.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Lemmy has some of the most obnoxious Dunning Kruger shit on any social media platform, especially when it comes to politics.

load more comments (1 replies)

TikTok I'd wait for evidence, but Elon absolutely boosted people like Tate

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 day ago

It's probably more that gen z voters are notorious for not responding to survey requests, and ignoring texts and phone calls from unknown numbers

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Good thing we have lots of kids, so I as usual cancel out my husband's vote (if he even bothers this time, R but not enthusiastic about Trump) and all the kids align with me. It may not matter here, with the influx of racist northerners, but who knows?

ETA I have at least one who was not going to vote when it was the two old guys but will vote for Harris.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago

Let this be a lesson to everybody - don't marry a Republican.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 92 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

My parents would vote by absentee ballot. Dad would have them do it together at the table at the same time. If my mom wanted to vote differently, she'd never have been able to.

[–] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 103 points 2 days ago

My father use to send me into the voting booth with my mother to make sure she "remembered" who to vote for....no election officials ever stopped me from going in there and I was too young to understand that I was a spy. My father's not violent but I'm sure I wasn't the only child spy being used by men who were.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That sounds illegal. Domestic Abuse AND Voter Intimidation

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes. Cops the the rescue.

They literally couldn't enact a fully passed bill preventing domestic abusers from owning guns because the police are full of them.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Hey, 60% of police have not been caught beating their wives!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was raised with the very strong belief that my vote was private, and I never had to tell anyone. I think it probably came from my father's own experiences as a hippie during the War in Vietnam, and voting differently than his conservative family...

Unfortunately, he's seemingly forgotten all of that in an angry pro-Trump haze, to the point where I'm convinced that he would do this to my mother now. If he had to. I think he's already got her conditioned to not have a political mind of her own. So no need.

Seems clear now that it was always just the typical boomer mantra of "me me me." The only reason he had any concept of being ostracized by family for voting a certain way, is because it happened to him. Now it doesn't matter because they all know he's a fucking nutter, so no need to hide it I guess.

In other words, if I were being raised by him right now, he'd be saying something completely different (and probably demanding to see my ballot). Just like every other value he instilled in me, then immediately ignored for the rest of his life.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 143 points 2 days ago (6 children)

We as a country need to mentally prepare ourselves to owe an absolutely massssssssssive debt of gratitude to The Women.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 82 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Saving our dumb collective ass again. As usual in elections at least within my fucking lifetime, women and ethnic minorities prove that they understand the values of America better than the ultra-fragile white conservative men who think they own this place by virtual of sex and race.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Up here in Canada as well. Almost exactly half of men, across all age groups, say they play to vote for the Cons. Last I saw it was 20% of women voting Con. I am incredibly embarrassed at my fellow men.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good to see, but in my country the trend is: Vote alt right because it's edgy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 149 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Very good way to frame voting to make it obvious it matters.

One person litters, you see a water bottle on the ground. Everybody litters, your town sucks. Tragedy of the commons takes an extra mental thinking to act on in day to day life.

[–] skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Yes and/but you might be interested to know these things about the “Tragedy of the Commons”:

Elinor Ostrom, awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2009, fundamentally challenged the “tragedy of the commons” theory, which Garrett Hardin popularized in 1968. Hardin’s theory argued that shared resources—like grazing land or fisheries—inevitably suffer from overuse because each user, acting in self-interest, seeks to maximize personal gain. Without external regulation or privatization, Hardin claimed, such resources would degrade irreparably.

Ostrom’s work provided a different perspective based on extensive field research across diverse communities managing shared resources, such as forests in Nepal and fisheries in Turkey. Through these studies, she found that local groups often developed effective, self-governing systems to sustain and share resources equitably. Ostrom identified eight core principles, such as clear resource boundaries, community-devised rules, local monitoring, and graduated sanctions for rule violations, which contribute to sustainable communal resource management. By documenting these successful cases, she demonstrated that, under certain conditions, communities could avoid the “tragedy” without privatization or top-down control.

Ostrom’s insights reshaped economic thinking by showing that cooperation, rather than competition alone, could lead to sustainable resource use. Her findings emphasize that real-world communities often solve commons problems through trust, local knowledge, and shared governance, challenging the idea that only private ownership or government intervention can manage common resources effectively. Ostrom’s approach has since inspired policies and frameworks for resource management across environmental, urban, and even space governance contexts, as her principles underscore the potential of collective, decentralized solutions to common-pool problems.

Her work offers an empowering view of human capacity for self-organization, contradicting the inevitability of Hardin’s “tragedy” and suggesting new possibilities for addressing global commons issues like climate change and biodiversity loss. This impact has encouraged rethinking in fields ranging from political science to ecology and economics.

Sources:

• Inside Story, “The not-so-tragic commons”

• Resilience, “The Victory of the Commons”

• Space Foundation, “The Commons Solution”

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

I can't cancel my parents out because they're dead. But they actually got more liberal as they got older and they would have canceled my sister's Wisconsin trump vote.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

The kids are alright.

[–] citrusface@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (25 children)

Looking at the captions in the image...

How could you be married to someone who supports Trump if you don't also support Trump. This just doesn't make sense or even seem safe to me.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 79 points 2 days ago

Abuse.

Religion usually plays a part.

Accepting the fundamental differences in viewpoint and pretending it isn’t there for the sake of kids

Etc.

My partners family comes to mind. Her mother is very liberal, her dad is a weird mix of liberal beliefs polluted by religion. They just don’t talk about it, everyone knows he’s wrong, he knows he’s wrong, he won’t change his viewpoints and his wife isn’t willing to collapse their family over it.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Gen Z supports trump."

[Citation Desperately Needed[

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/breaking-down-gender-gap-gen-z-politics-desk-rcna177155 about the poll results they're referring to in the article. Gen Z has the biggest gender gap of all the age groups, with women for Harris by a 33 point margin, but the men about evenly split between Harris and Trump.

If you think about the new voters coming of voting age for this election, it's been 9 years since Trump rode down the escalator to kick off his campaign. So they were too young to hear about or pay attention to a lot the unsavory stuff about him back then, like the Access Hollywood tape. For some reason, many Gen Z men find him appealing, but not Gen Z women. For instance today I saw this video of two Gen Z young women hearing the Access Hollywood audio for the first time. You can see how horrified they are (as most normal people were back when it first came out).

[–] Charlatan@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago

I hope Gen Z shows up. I don't buy into poll results.

[–] AquaticHelicopter@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago

That's one of the things I like to tell friends or family I know that will say "Voting doesn't matter". I'll usually say something like, "Think of the most vile person on the opposite side. If you vote then you're negating their vote at a minimum. Because you know that extreme person is going to vote every time."

Doesn't always work since some people are stubborn but changed a few people!

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

she looks like the black guy from the good place

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Lol, that would be Chidi.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

we all vote as a family and laugh about what our net vote is. been like this for decades. the olds only voted for trump once, which is a relief.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›