this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
160 points (98.8% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2395 readers
23 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] comrade19@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, messages or posts, both past and future. With this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute. NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tacitly allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. FACEBOOK DOES NOT HAVE MY PERMISSION TO SHARE PHOTOS OR MESSAGES.”

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

Facebook, "Then get the fuck off my property."

This is it. Same shit for driving on roads as a sov cit. Government, "Then get the fuck off my property."

Oh, but thatt's different, somehow. Roads are naturally occurring, self-maintaining, and for the natural man to enjoy. /s

[–] Addition1291@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Whenever I see these I make a comment on how these are spread by evil hacker men so that tech illiterate rubes self-identity.

I don't know if that's actually true but it sure got the boomers on my feed to stop posting this bullshit for a while.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Oh, you think they're done? Clearly there's more coming.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What is it about lead poisoning that causes this handwriting style?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look, the guy has a hard enough time remembering the letters, and copying the words from his "reminder card." His brain is already taxed! Give him a break.

[–] flicker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

taxed

Now I see why they avoid taxes so hard.

[–] rubikcuber@feddit.uk 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

NO LIBILITY was my favorite.

[–] federalreverse 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

To the Postmaster General? Isn't that a US federal position?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 25 points 1 month ago

Someone should set up an alternative state-citizen (or whatever) Postmaster General, assuring these people that they are the one legitimate one because (insert pseudolegal mumbo-jumbo here) and, for a monthly fee (payable in advance, real cash only), they will handle their complaints and send them back encouraging replies about legal actions they’re initiating against the “fraudsters” in admiralty court.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Never ask a Mennonite why it's ok to use car springs on their horse buggies.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You mean Amish. They're both Anabaptists, but Mennonites are generally fine with technology, they just dress weird.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I live and work with, amongst and alongside thousands of Mennonites (as well as hundreds of Amish - they make fun of each other).

Currently in my fridge are 12 dozen brown eggs, purchased for $2.50/doz, from an old order (horse/buggy, no electricity) Mennonite , and I have a freezer full of meat from the same farm.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Huh. That's basically how you can tell the difference around here.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hear ya! Pretty well all the Amish are horse/buggy/non-worldly as far as possessions, etc, even to the point of extremely-limited contact with outsiders, even for commerce.

That being said, I've seen a few Amish breaking clothes colour barriers, with very vivid blues (even men!), and purples.

Mennonites' lifestyles vary hugely. I can rhyme off a few dozen multi-millionaires I've known, pilots, dentists, international business owners, etc.

On the other hand, there may be a single phone (cell phone nowadays) for a single farming community of the 'old order' kind. For the most part, all 'orders' of Mennonites conduct commerce, often dividing hitech business activities (dairy, modern milling) with no-tech personal/home lives, on the same property.

tl;dr - I have a Mennonite fetish.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The animals we create are morally equivalent to our own children and are owed the exact same unconditional love and protection.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The animals we create are morally equivalent to our own children and are owed the exact same unconditional love and protection.

-- Michael Scott ?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They don't exactly believe the government isn't real. They say it isn't legitimate, but they don't really understand the concept of legitimacy. They think it's simultaneously a real, inescapable entity and something you can cheat your way out of.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah its sorta funny as you can live mostly without the government if you want to live as a substanance farmer. Even the amish use cash but after property ownership your farm does not need to make a profit which it won't if you don't use currency or public roads or spaces or anything. Heck you will likely lose out mostly since the life you live would likely qualify you for assistance.

[–] federalreverse 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fair enough but I wouldn't report anyone to an authority that I don't recognize.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't either, but we haven't pretzled ourselves into the irrational knot of the SovCit where the government simultaneously has all the power and no power.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they treat the government like irish fae, supreme power that is magically bound to follow certain rules and if you play around those rules they're powerless

i'm sure they think dora the explorer was a documentary, swiper no swiping!

awww rats

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You can't tax me! I'm standing in a circle of salt!

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

No Libility

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

All that writing for nothing since none of it is anywhere near a 45 degree angle. That's how you unlock the power of those words.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So a 5 second google shows the law firm exists. Why does he say it doesn’t?

[–] cowfodder@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Because he's an idiot.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Sovcits believe the "case" of the name makes a difference..

Most likely they don't want to pay their debts and are being sued.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 19 points 1 month ago

NO LIBILITY

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

LMFAO zero chances this guy doesn't make this shit his entire personality

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I'm guessing he can't return the cops to sender when they haul his ass off to jail when he inevitably ignores the summons.

[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If a customer gave me this back to return with all this shit all over it, I'd tell them I couldn't accept it. This is essentially defacing the mail in my book. I'll give them a solution to their problem and tell them to remove their mailbox, that way I won't have to deal with that nutjob anymore.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Even if this was a valid tactic, does this person not realise the person on the other side would actually need to be able to read what is written for them to action anything?

Not everyone has nice handwriting (I sure don't), but you should at least try to actually be legible - that bit in the middle is just barely legible to someone actually trying to read what it says.


Also, not everyone who sends mail to you has to have a contract with you (and certainly not an international contract), especially not for a summons. This kind of letter isn't asking you nicely, it's telling you what"s gonna happen, and you better listen.

[–] clb92@feddit.dk 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Relevant Tom Scott video "How the US Postal Service reads terrible handwriting" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxCha4Kez9c

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Games Magazine readers back in the 80s and 90s regularly sent mail to the magazine with the address in the form of a puzzle and postal workers would solve them and send them into the magazine. It was pretty cool.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I don't see the problem. It looks just like Mail Fraup to me.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I have a funny feeling the person who wrote that didn’t do too well at school and that’s the best handwriting they can pull off.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The fact that he doesn't understand is a 100% guarantee.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Gurfaild@feddit.de 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

I find it funny that they are banned in Russia, when Putin's entire goal is returning to Russian Empire.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Sovereign Citizens, the totally whacko backbone of this community.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement

[–] federalreverse 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I had the same thought in my head when I first heard the term. But no, "Sov" is for "sovereign".