this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

10264 readers
2754 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

donald trump gets 10 warnings for intimidating witnesses and indefinite trial postponement for hoarding and most likely leaking classified documents. Sweet sweet justice.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People keep trying to convince me it's not evidence of two justice systems.

 

But it is.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's evidence that we live in corporatocracies masquerading as "democracies". The 0.1%, shielded by the liability protections of the corporations they own, and their armies of lobbyists — they finance our politics, choose who ends up on the ballot, and shadow write most of our legislation, policies, and regulations.

Trump is free because he is a part of that < 0.1%.

The Boeing execs who oversaw systemic fraud, lied to the FAA, and murdered 166 people still ARE FREE AND RICH. Why? Because they are the 0.1%.

The IPCC hosts fossil fuelled climate summits in fossil fuel exporting countries, inviting fossil fuel corporations and lobbyists to attend — at a scientific conference about how to solve the crisis they created and profited from! why? Because we live in corporatocracies.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For the record, Aaron Swartz never actually went to trial, nor was he "sentenced" to anything.

Federal prosecutors came after him with overzealous charges in an effort to make him accept a plea deal (they do that a lot), which he rejected. It would have gone to court where the feds would have had to justify the charges they were bringing.

But that never happened because he killed himself.

We don't actually know how this all would have played out.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The comment in OPs post is misleading but he did nevertheless kill himself because of the justice system trying to prosecute him for accessing science most likely funded by public money in the first place.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

And will never know, selfishly speaking, the possible extent of his further contributions to society. Died at 26 after an incredible life already.

Besides his life, what else did they steal from us?

RIP Aaron

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Look, the kid was a hero, but this is also patently false.

He was not sentenced to 35 years. The trial hadn't started. 35 years was the maximum possible sentence. He was given a plea deal for 6 months that he rejected.

We don't need to spin lies to make his story more tragic than it already is.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

35 years max, plea for 1/2 that was rejected. He was going to get the book thrown at him to make an example. 5 years minimum but I wouldn't doubt 10-20.

The rapist traitor that headed a insurrection on Jan 6 2021 has never spent a day in jail and is still the frontrunner for president to be legally elected in 2024.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

plea for 1/2 that was rejected

The rejected plea was for 6 months.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

6 months is 1/2 of a year.

[–] bronzle@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

While that is true.

“1/2 that” would imply 1/2 of 35 years or 17.5 years.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

also he worked with wikileaks... i think he was named as a source posthumously...

he also wrote an open source system of servers that function exactly like wikileaks submission system (actually i think it is, given clues as to how it operates... like the manning chat logs)
dead drop is now called "open drop" and powers every major newspaper's leak submission system...

he was murdered.

not only the did it make no sense, given the 6 month plea bargain option, but he was an outspoken activist and would've at least left a note... in the form of some post online...

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 4 months ago

He committed the idealist's perennial sin: He thought that because the system is bullshit, it's okay not to play ball with it.

"Hey this is a bunch of crap. I can be guilty or innocent, and the right move is always to plead guilty even if I didn't do a damn thing wrong, because if I try to fight the case they're gonna tack on a ton of new charges and they almost always win and I might go away for most of my life."

"Preach."

"I'm gonna plead not guilty because I didn't do anything wrong."

"No no no no no that is not the way to reform the system no no no that is a bad mistake"

Aaron Swartz was a fuckin hero. Read his posthumous book, it is wonderful. But the same idealism and faith that led him to the good things he did in his painfully short time here, also led him not to understand how to engage with the US federal government and keep your skin.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For bulk downloading science journals he had access to.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

for breaking and entering*

and DoS

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Articles paid for by the public through grants btw

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

With authors often paying for open access publications literally out of their very own money, not just grants.

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Not at the time this happened. Aaron's case was one of the motivating factors that led to the Open Access publication movement gaining enough traction that authors could publish that way. JSTOR access is paid for and administered on college campuses by libraries and librarians as a whole field felt terrible both about the paid publication system and the way Aaron was treated. As a community of professionals, the Librarian and Information Science community pushed very hard for the adoption of Open Access publishing into the Academic community.

[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Shout out to Alexandra elbakyan. She continues part of aaron's work by running sci-hub and libgen, but lives safely out of reach of the american criminal "justice" system 💔

[–] Hubi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He didn't even share them as far as I know, he just downloaded them. And the trial hadn't started yet when he committed suicide.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He didn't get the chance to share them because he was caught downloading them, and his download requests were getting blocked.

And to be clear, he wasn't downloading from the Internet as one might download a car, he went into a restricted networking closet and connected directly to the switch, leaving a computer sitting there sending access requests. He had to keep going back to it to check on the progress, which is when they caught him.

And the trial hadn't started yet when he committed suicide.

Yeah, I agree with the sentiment of the post, but this is just wildly misleading. He was not sentenced to anything, he committed suicide before the trial.

He was given a plea deal for 6 months that he rejected, in an effort to make the feds justify the ludicrous charges they were pressing. Had it gone to trial, he certainly wouldn't have been found not guilty, but it's unlikely many of those charges would have stuck. It's extremely unlikely he would actually have served 35 years.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Downloading isn't a crime, is it?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You wouldn't download a car would you??

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago
[–] Bruhh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If I remember correctly, it wasn't even illegal since these scientific articles should have been public to begin with because they used public funds.

[–] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That may be so, but IIRC he was charged with breaking into MIT's networking room and illegally tapping into their network to get the articles:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261840/Aaron-Swartz-MIT-surveillance-shot-ruined-tragic-Reddit-founders-life.html

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well that's definitely burying the lede from the OP.

It wasn't the sharing part they had a problem with, it was the B&E and hacking.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's not that clear cut and I would recommend listening to the Behind The Bastards episode about him:

Behind the Bastards: Part One: Christmas Hero Episode: Aaron Swartz

https://omny.fm/shows/behind-the-bastards/part-one-christmas-hero-episode-aaron-swartz

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That also may be so, but 35 years is fucked up for that. pretty sure child porn first time offenders is like 15 to 30 so hacking MIT for stuff that should have been free gets you more jail time then a first CP offence. OK thats fucked up

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

Assuming this is actually by the guy, here is what the linked article says about child porn:

In the US, it is illegal to possess or distribute child pornography, apparently because doing so will encourage people to sexually abuse children.

This is absurd logic. Child pornography is not necessarily abuse. Even if it was, preventing the distribution or posession of the evidence won't make the abuse go away. We don't arrest everyone with videotapes of murders, or make it illegal for TV stations to show people being killed.

Wired has an article on how these laws destroy honest people's lives.

[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

OK a reason to not like him but sending him to prison for his views that he didnt act on sounds like fasicm lol I dont agree with his views just saying

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Child pornography is not necessarily abuse.

Yikes.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

An image of an event is not the event. That's the reasoning there. There's some sense of logic there, though the knowledge their abuse is used by pedophiles can absolutely be a continuing trauma for the victims.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Oil CEOs pay fines for bringing about a global climate catastrophe. Fascist politicians are given slaps on the wrist for an attempted coup d'etat. Government officials openly commit gross violations of privacy and suffer no consequences.

But a guy hacks a university network and downloads a hoard of scientific articles that should have been freely accessible to begin with and he gets 35 years in prison. I'll admit I wasn't familiar with this case before I saw this picture. Which is kind of insane in and of itself.

[–] Sagittarii@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Reddit could've been so good with him at the helm...

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good thing we've got a second opportunity. ;)

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

OP is referring to Lemmy

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

bits are not bugs

[–] fossphi@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

I highly recommend watching the documentary on him, Internet's own boy.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not exactly what happened.

Aaron committed suicide before his case went to trial, and so he was never convicted let alone sentenced. 35 years was never even likely; had it gone to trial there's every reason to think he'd have been acquitted outright, or at worst given a slap on the wrist. Not that he should have even been charged, of course.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well now I’ve got two competing claims, and I can’t believe either one until I see the authoritative history on it

[–] thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There's a documentary on YouTube called "The internet's own boy", if you want to learn more. Basically, he was offered a 6 month plea, but he would be a convicted felon, and basic logic/morality tells you that you shouldn't plead guilty to a crime that you didn't commit. However, the justice system is very imperfect, and often people plead guilty for reduced sentencing even if they're not guilty. He stood on principle until his legs gave out. they were already in millions spent in attorney fees. Not a shred of justice can be found in how Aaron's story ended.