this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
30 points (78.8% liked)

World News

38797 readers
2005 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 3 points 23 minutes ago

but feel the punishment does not fit the crime.

Agree. Was too soft. She went in and charged to vandalize and attack asylum seekers. Maybe some exile will teach her some empathy on how those people were already feeling.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 hours ago

Yuck, Daily Express. One of the nastiest rags in the UK.

[–] rumschlumpel 26 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

"child, 13" - a 13yo is a teenager, not a child.

That article was a pain in the ass to read, horribly structured.

What she did: "The court heard the girl was taken to the protest outside the Potters International Hotel, which houses asylum seekers, by a parent of a friend. Police body-worn video showed the teenager briefly bang and kick at a door of the hotel while voices could be heard telling her to stop."

Her sentence, a "12-month referral order": "A referral order means you are required to attend a youth offender panel. The panel, you, your parents/carers and the victim (where appropriate) agree a contract aimed at repairing the harm that has been caused and addressing the causes of the offending behaviours." (https://unlock.org.uk/advice/referral-order-18/)

The conviction seems to be on permanent record, though, which does seem a bit much for this considering her age.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If the Wikipedia page on expungement is accurate there is some sort of process where it will get sealed from public view after a certain amount of time has passed.

I do agree if this is a one off thing it shouldn't haunt the rest of her life, especially given the fact that we're talking about a thirteen year old who was a victim of (at best) extremely negligent caregiving.

[–] rumschlumpel 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Good find! And yeah, the referral order sentence seems to be rather obviously aimed at rehabilitation instead of punishing, would be weird if that was combined with a lifelong criminal record that is visible to potential employers and the like.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Teenagers are children, my dude.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 32 points 5 hours ago

Conservatives when a criminal justice system is punishing someone they don't like: "Blood for the blood god!"

Conservatives when someone's held accountable for a hate crime: "What has happened to our humanity?!"

Daily Express - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Daily Express:

MBFC: Right - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1958933/uk-riots-child-sentenced-no-future?int_source=nba
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support