this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
493 points (91.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4198 readers
1288 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BMTea@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

You're basically arguing that this process had nothing to do with capitalism. Like Apple isn't capitalist, it's just workers working. Like what is the logic here. Those workers didn't do it to create the iPhone... they did it because the capitalist who wanted to create the iPhone was paying them. So that his privately owned firm could compete against other similar firms in the market.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

Yes and workers in the Soviet Union also made telephones. But only for the party leaders who didn't see there was a need for ordinary people to have phones.

Yes, workers make phones in any system. But who decides how many to make and what price to charge for them?

[–] witty_username@feddit.nl 39 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Also, many of the technologies that comprise the iphone were developed in universities

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

For profit universities. In the states at least. Where students go into lifetime debt and their work is profited from. Occasionally they get a prize and pat on the head.

Then they spend their lives working for companies that make massive profits off their ideas. If they're very very lucky, some people might learn their names and what they did before they die, but that almost never happens.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's worse. Public universities that by definition are not for profit. And then all the other things you mentioned.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I find it hard to believe that a university of any kind in America is not motivated monetarily

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago

This is based on a widespread misconception that non-profit organizations are not also pursuing money. They don’t get to take home the profits but they still want to maximize revenue and minimize costs to grow and sustain themselves. So while they don’t behave exactly the same as privately owned orgs, there is a lot of overlap.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 50 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think that's what they must when they say "built by capitalism."

I mean, any other usage would be utterly ridiculous. So, that must be what they mean.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

It literally is. The idea I’ve seen around is that these things couldn’t be built without someone getting the short end of the stick. They also believe that no one would innovate without a profit motive. These people genuinely believe that the only other option is flipping entirely over to that garbage attempt the soviets made at communism. They fundamentally cannot comprehend the idea of nuance and so “capitalism is the only idea that works”.

We know that CEO wages are insane and that the reason we can’t afford stuff is our stagnant pay. We know that people innovate for their own curiousity all the time. We know that capitalism actually hates innovation because it means retooling and spending money on R&D and we’ve seen it fight progress basically at every turn or watched it buy up competition so it wouldn’t have to any real work.

So yea, you’re right.

[–] ganymede@lemmy.ml 68 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

well yeah most of its operating software was derived from opensource projects, but capitalists exploited those opensource project without giving the tinest bit back, so...

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

For a while there, the Darwin OS was open source.

"It's better to be a pirate than join the navy" - Steve Jobs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (10 children)

If you want to talk about Apple specifically, then consider this. When they began making popular tech like MacBooks and Ipods, they justified the prices by giving free warranties. They would replace or repair any device at no extra cost of the consumer. Well, they stopped doing that and then wanted you to pay an annual fee to get the same service. Then they did away with that and now it's pay per repair or replacement and the prices went up instead of down. My theory is that was their business target in the first place. Get their products wide spread, and then pull rug out from under the consumer. To me, Apple is the best example of capitalism

[–] rowdyrockets@lemm.ee 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

AppleCare still exists. So this is misinformation.

And just as an anecdote, I have not felt like Apple has ever “pulled the rug out” on me and I’m an Apple product consumer. Are you?

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (5 children)

That’s simply not true. Apple still has the same one year limited warranty they had when iPods were released. Steve Jobs justified the higher premium because you were getting “the store in the box,” referring to the in-store troubleshooting and educational support at no extra cost.

Source: worked for Apple for over a decade

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What the hell is a store in a box?? Without cool aid it doesn't make sense

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Steve Jobs' name for a help desk at no marginal cost

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (12 children)

Well, it’s always “humans made this”.

I think it’s trivial to argue that without capitalism we would not have iPhones, they are the product of the desire to please a market to make a lot of money.

If the driver was "I want to build something useful for my fellow humans" that wouldn’t likely trend toward an elitist redundant unsustainable device built on the exploitation of cheap labor.

[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago

If not for capitalism, we’d be missing out on internet ads, online dating and for-profit healthcare!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TAYRN@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (45 children)

Okay, sure, I'll play devil's advocate. The engineering that goes into a single iPhone is unfathomable. It would take an entire lifetime of study to even try to produce something close.

But Apple pays about a jillion engineers about a jillion dollars each, and so they're able to create new iPhones every year or so. That was 100% powered by capitalism.

Yeah, workers physically put the pieces together. Do you think any of them could design an iPhone without any help or reference? Or a single body to tie it all together?

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Engineers are workers. Well paid yes, but you're going against the wrong people, they're not capitalists and don't make the decisions that matter.

Then, why do you think an a economy post capitalist wouldn't be able to develop smart phones? Do you think we'd return to feudalism and the world would devolve into dark ages and all the scientific knowledge would disappear?

[–] koper@feddit.nl 9 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Do you think people cannot collaborate without capitalism?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 9 hours ago

People do all the time in academia and science.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (43 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›