this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
27 points (63.4% liked)

Technology

58613 readers
4258 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It will never be $30,000 or less. He did the same thing with the Model 3.

You really just can’t believe anything this guy says regarding his products.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 30 points 1 day ago

He said $30,000 for the cybertruck too. $30,000 just seems to be his "I don't really know the price" price.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't he say full self drive was two years away at least 5 years ago?

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago

Try 10 years

[–] anubis119@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just a reminder that reasonably minded shareholders would never take what Elon says as anything other than fluffery, and should refrain from making any financial decisions based on such fluff.

https://electrek.co/2024/10/02/elon-musk-celebrates-winning-lawsuit-tesla-self-driving-claims-embarrassing-defense/

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

WTF? How can a CEO walk from responsibility by claiming puffery? Which is the same as admitting to lying!
In civilized countries CEO is a position of responsibility, you can't just talk up stock or sales with false claims. The requirements for a CEO are higher than usual, exactly because everything they say can have a financial impact.
I'm pretty sure that judgement is not according to normal practices. It's disgusting they let that pedo walk again and again.

load more comments (1 replies)

Well, the stock tanked by ~10% after the news, so yeah, shareholders don't seem to be buying it and want more specifics.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What’s the conversion of Elon years to real years?

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the general rule of thumb is to shift the units of time up.

If he says 2 weeks, try 2 months. If he says 2 months, wait 2 years.

Robotaxis in 2 decades I think is actually achievable.

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 23 hours ago

It's funny that Boston Dynamic has been quite successful with their biped robot, then Tesla announce something without even a working prototype.

Then Waymo has been quite successful with their driverless taxi, then Melon announce something without even a working prototype.

I wonder what he will copy next.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

I believe it involves impossible math, like dividing by 0

[–] teejay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Hopefully it's infinity. It's Elon Musk we're talking about. These are 100% going to kill people (pedestrians, other drivers, riders) and animals.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)

In real people years or “we will be on mars soon” years?

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

In "self-driving by 2016" years

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Good question.
The Mars base should be started years ago according to what Musk claimed, and they should have manned flights to Mars by now. And all he has is half failed tests just to do one orbit around earth! 🤣🤣🤣

For 8 years he has claimed Fully autonomous driving will be ready next year. He even claimed years ago, that a car picking you up and driving you across the country was something we can do today!

Enron Musk is a conman, he is obviously a liar, and there are people who still believe him?!

[–] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

But it's all the government's fault for having regulations that stop him doing what he wants - he'd be on Mars by now if it wasn't for the stupid government stopping him from poisoning a protected nature reserve and crashing rockets into people.

Don't they understand? It's really important to get people to mars so there is a place for rich assholes to go when the environment on earth is completely trashed beyond repair

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Plan B secure survival on another planet.
Why? Because:
Plan A Is to make max profits, and don't give a shit about the only planet that sustains human life.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

Muskrat years.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

You know what would have been even more useful is a 28k model 2. This show was a scam.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 41 points 1 day ago (9 children)

if he gets over his fear of lidar and stops trying to do everything with cameras this could actually work out ... so basically this isn't going to work out.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

this could actually work out

No it won't, Elon Next year Musk has promised Fully autonomous driving next year since 2016. He has sold his cars with subscriptions for FSD for years, despite it doesn't work. It's even illegal to call it FSD now, so Tesla has to call it assisted FSD, which is an oxymoron.

With this move, Enron Musk will more likely ensure the continued decline of Tesla. The Cybercab most likely will not be a moneymaker, and the focus on developing it, will detract from Tesla developing much needed new EV models, for a market with increasing competition.

Tesla is far from #1 in developing autonomous driving, so the chances are very slim that they would be even close to be first to market.

AFAIK this is pretty much the current rank:
-1 Waymo (Google)
-2 Mercedes
-3 Mobil Eye
-4 GM (Cruise)
-5 Baidu
-6 Tesla

Possibly Nissan-Renault (WeRide) and Nvidia can match Tesla too.

Notice that Tesla used MobilEye originally up to 2016, but MobilEye ended the partnership after a Tesla model S had a fatal crash. I suspect the irresponsible claims implementation and practices by Elon Musk were too much.

Elon Musk is insane and a con man, to believe anything he claims about the future of his companies is naive.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because Musk has a weird obsession that everything needs to work with just cameras, and no other sensors can help. While it might work someday in the far future with proper AGI (e.g Delamain from Cyberpunk 2077), until then it's a pretty hopeless endeavour.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is computer vision has a LONG way to go before it’s truly on par with human eyesight. Musk loves to crow how cameras are sufficient since we use our eyes to drive.

The thing is, eyes have special neural circuits that detect motion. They essentially filter out unnecessary information and send just the motion details to the brain. This prevents the brain from being overloaded with every detail the eye constantly sees.

And being overloaded with everything is exactly what computer vision currently does. It’s just a stream of images that the computer must analyze completely. So it’s working exactly opposite to how the eye & brain works.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 25 points 1 day ago

What mass transit program is Musk trying to disrupt now? (As he did California's high speed rail with the Hyperloop.)

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dumbest car design yet Elon. Congrats. Nothing says cab like a coupe design with gullwing doors.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

I agree it is an idiotic design for a cab, but I'd argue the Cybertruck is a way dumber design even by visuals alone. That thing would at least make for a half decent sports car (again, visually).

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A cab with no driver is just an incredibly expensive gender neutral toilet. I shudder to think what will be done in these if they ever exist.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Musk is installing men and women's toilets separately, like God intended.

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Given Tesla's usual build quality I feel like it's pretty much inevitable that there are going to be an enormous amount of skull and limb injuries from those gullwing doors.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So they didn't unveil it...

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

At tesla its not an unveiling until musk puts a brick through it

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh. So "unveiling" doesn't mean they have something. Just the "2 years" promise is repeated for the N'th time ;-)

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Normally it's always promised next year, so a 2 year deadline means the project is in serious trouble.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 19 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Its name is still not clear. Prior to the event, Musk referred to it as both ‘Cybercab’ and ‘Robotaxi’.

Couldn't even decide a name and everything is 3d render. Add 3 years at least to the existing estimation. At least they didn't have a toy rc as a representation, like their announcement of the robot.

Musk said that Cybercab is equipped with Tesla’s AI5 onboard computer and based on a visual check, it appears to only use cameras, like Tesla’s existing vehicles.

Gonna add another 1 year to it. Cybertruck didn't even have full autopilot yet, and required the car to be babyseated. Steering-less car that only use camera for their autopilot is gonna be a disaster.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Steering-less car that only use camera for their autopilot is gonna be a disaster.

Already is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 12 points 1 day ago

Coming in 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, oh whatever. In the future Ketamine Karen will introduce a new scam / con / road safety hazard!

[–] DarkGamer@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago

I've heard this one before… Musk has proven himself an untrustworthy bad faith actor who lies constantly about many things, especially self-driving Teslas.

Now he's a right-wing loon because he thinks they will let him get away with fraud. He acts like he's on a speed run to ruin his own credibility.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 11 points 1 day ago

Johnny cab hopes you enjoyed the ride

[–] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

So glad I have Tesla shorts lol

load more comments
view more: next ›