this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
77 points (94.3% liked)

Europe

1565 readers
375 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/44521474

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

What is the excuse for Germany? The US won't, but can blame AIPAC for holding them hostage. Is there something similar going on there or is it some remnant of guilt from the Holocaust that compels them to assist Israel after all they've done?

[–] Melchior 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It is partly guilt from the Holocaust, as in Germany is a big part of the reason Israel exists. So this entire Israel antisemitism plays very different in Germany. Also Scholz Ukraine response was weak and he got a lot of bad press for it, so he tried to go hard pro Israel. At the same time new export permits have not been issued for months, as there is a refusal to deliver any weapons, which could be used for war crimes, while being the largest donor to Palestine.

So a weird situation. The US going hard on Israel would help a lot though, to clean that up.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the insight! I wish we could go harder on Israel here, but with our outrageously stupid ruling that corporations are people and money is speech, we now have all political parties beholden to large money influence because you can't limit the freedom of speech... :(

[–] Saleh 1 points 1 month ago

It is also a veil for anti-muslim racism, painting antisemitism as "imported" by muslims (despite German Nazis being the main perpetrators of antisemiticm crime) and taking the support for Israel as "proof" of not being bigoted.

Bonus points for using it to attacked progressive leftists and label them as antisemitic or terror supporters without having to engage with their demands. Also the fascists from the AfD and now the CDU are using it to push around the less fascist parties. They made "unconditionally supporting Israel" a ritual to prove how good or bad people they are. So when the AfD demands something in regards to Israel the SPD, Green and others try to top it. Can't be that the Nazis are better friends of Israel than they are...

Meanwhile these things are used to repress non zionist Jews, who get disproportionately affected by getting their funding cut in culture and science, being excluded from events and even being attacked by "anti-antisemitism commisioners", with accusations like being "allegedly jewish". So Germany is back to classifying who are "good" and who are "bad" Jews.

It has nothing to do with logic or consistent values. It is a psychotic hysteria.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] federalreverse 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"We have not decided not to supply weapons. We have supplied weapons and we will supply weapons," Scholz told parliament

So the word "soon" that is in the title β€” did that come from Scholz or is it an invention on the part of Reuters?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Scholz used the word "soon", but referring to deliveries in general, not weapons. Character-wise it should be noted that Scholz is an absolute master at not saying anything as well as saying things: If he did want to say something we wouldn't be discussing whether he said something.

The government is overall quite keen on not explicitly saying that they've stopped weapons exports, for the time being. Reason being that they can't legally issue export licenses. They can't go to parliament, either, saying "erm we should scratch those paragraphs about not exporting weapons when there's signs they could be used in a genocide", that's political suicide, and they can't overrule the ministerial level (which makes those assessments) either, any such attempt would be a) illegal and b) leak instantly and thus be c) political suicide. Also I don't think any of the ruling parties is in any way keen on exporting weapons to Israel. Stuff like air defence systems, sure, but even that must be weighed against Ukraine's needs.

And they also can't say that Israel is committing genocide. That wouldn't be straight-out political suicide but it would force a discussion that noone wants to have, sitting things out, hoping that Israelis get their shit together and get rid of that Kahanite government, looks way more inviting.

[–] Tagger@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder if repeatedly attaking un peacekeepers will affect this?

[–] Saleh 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, the announcement came as Israel made a new offensive into northern Gaza, ethnically cleansing the area and slaughtering more journalists and doctors and after UNFIL made statements about being threatened by the IDF.

So it seems to be about showing support for these actions in a plausibly deniability kind of way.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So many removed comments...

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I went and double checked community info, yet I can't understand why mine was removed. Probably some German moderator seeing antisemitic content everywhere πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

[–] federalreverse 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Fwiw, yours was the one I was least sure about removing. You're right, there are a lot of clearly civilian victims. The way you worded it seemed a bit too inviting for another rage thread though.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My comment was simply pointing out how Germany's been involved in genocide at least twice in modern history.

I'd appreciate if someone would challenge me with a sound argument rather than censoring me.

[–] federalreverse 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Your comment was literally just "What is it with Germans and genocide?" Besides the one interpretation you suggest, there are a lot of other possibilities.

In any case, if a thread had started from your comment, do you think it could have been a productive one?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, let's just say I'm that dense. How else would you interpret my comment? How unproductive would the thread be?

[–] federalreverse 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

E.g. "It must be a genetic thing" or "Gee, they just have a genocidal culture" or ...

The way you phrased it also suggests the direction the discussion will go: It's not going to be about genocides, it's going to be anti-German, although genocides are unfortunately fairly common among humans. (Of course, "genocide" is a somewhat mushy politically-applied term as well which doesn't help.)

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

I'd understand the thread as author intended. Just my 5 cents. And honestly, it's time to talk openly about it, even though the thread could diverge - in that case, weed the offensive comments, not censor beforehand.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

Hi, ok, while I disagree, thanks for letting me know. Perhaps we need some rage to end the horrors going on in Middle east...

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This community is overmoderated, they frequently remove slightly offtopic comments. You can see this in the modlog.

But in this case there were some really extreme comments calling for violence.

I will report your comment because it's also noise, and they will remove it I'm sure.

[–] federalreverse 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now I won't do it. 🐧

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I will remove my comments anyway. I don't agree with your moderation policy, so I don't comment here as frequently as before, and remove most of my comments after some day as a protest.

[–] federalreverse 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While I can't stop you, please do not do that.

As to your criticism of overmoderating: I am not removing every off-topic discussion either. What I am sometimes doing is removing comments that just say "Good." or "Bad.", etc., especially if it's the third such comment under that particular post. I don't find these helpful. I am open to no longer doing that.

As to posts from you that I removed:

  • There was a meme early on β€” which we ultimately decided is content better suited for !YUROP, the rule was made in response to your meme, I think. That was really unfortunate.
  • You also posted a video of right-wing ultras shouting "Palestine" β€” which I removed I wasn't sure what message to take from it, as it was basically uncommented. I also wouldn't want to moderate in a community of uncheckable raw footage where I don't know whether it is manipulated. β€” Quite honestly, I don't know what mods in war-related communities like the various versions of !Ukraine do.
[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

That's exactly what I call overmoderation. The upvote-downvote system should deal with that.

Banning nazis, and what you did in this comment section was correct, and I think that's what mods should do. But deleting random things you call noise and deleting comments which are actually related to the topic, but not in the format you want (not in English or not text but images) will kill this community on the long run.

[–] bigFab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I really appreciate a mod that takes the time to discuss specifics of removed content. I think the same way on removing lazy comments like 'Good' or 'Germany evil'.

On the other hand I saw in the modlog a reason to remove being 'Trolling'. The specific comment ironically suggested Germany enjoys producing genocide. The comment could have been more elaborated, but I think the irony is more important than the truthness of the statement.

If we are not allowed to confront genocide with even sarcasm, what else can we do besides crying?

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How do I get to the modlog?

[–] idegenszavak@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

On desktop, sidebar of the community -> Modlog button. This link is on their instance: https://feddit.org/modlog/5765

[–] 0x815 0 points 1 month ago

So many removed comments…

It seems the removed comments are from always the same few users ...