this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

196

16215 readers
2243 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember kids, Tankies wants to undermine democracy - same as facists.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

I think we should consider the feelings of Hexbear users when posting or commenting.

If you think they'll dislike it, it's probably a good post.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

Hey everyone, just a reminder:

  • Yes Nazis are also bad, we don't have Nazis pop up anywhere near as often as Tankies
  • We remove and ban Nazis too
  • We're aware of Lemmy's main code writers being ML's, and it's not great.
  • Please report any bigot bullshit, or fascist/tankie dogwhistles.
[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think most of you need to worry way less about sounding sufficiently the "right kind" of leftist and focus more on promoting leftism through action. More than half the "tankie" discourse is, at best, a needless distraction from actual progress. Lose your buzzwords and stop the ideological purity pissing contest and actually put in the work in your communities instead, goddamn.

[–] nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No fuck that bullshit. The largest leftist majority is aligned with non-revolutionary socialist democracy... Tankies are actively undermining the largest leftist group by refusing to partake in democracy. And now WE need to stop complaining and work together and not be so pure. Fuck off with this absolute disgrace of a discourse. The group that controls the purity of its members by refusal to partake in progress through democratic means are tankies. They want it all to go down in flames. Their idea of progress is revolutionary uprising.

[–] Cockmaster6000@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The guy needs a speech bubble that says "Stalin did nothing wr-"

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I mean when people give Stalin shit yet don't bat an eye at what Lenin did, I can safely assume they're going off cold war propaganda.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

These threads are odd to me, considering how many people call all communists tankies. The word seems to be used by anarchists, conservatives, communists, anti-communists, and more, and every person has a slightly different definition.

Half the people here could consider the other half to be the tankies everyone is mad at.

To be clear this isn't me saying "be nice to the tankies" this is me saying "the overuse of this word is confusing the shit out of me."

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It became confusing when liberals learnt of the word - now they hurl the word at anyone who dares to remind them that being pro-capitalist is still a right-wing thing to be.

[–] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm an anarchist, we don't call anybody tankies. Tankies is a term coming from the UK i think the 80s some eastern european nation was taken over by the USSR and some Brittish came out in support of it. So they were called tankies.

These political fighting words need to be layed to rest. Communists hate me as much as anybody else but I'd rather engage on the idea level instead of ad hominem attacks and name calling.

I suspect this whole tankie thing might be a coordinated propaganda campaign geared at discrediting communists and at the same time creating tension between them and other leftits. I suspect this as this whole infighting over small differences doesn't lead to a victory for the left but effectively disables and neutralizes it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsqE9kEsDVY

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I’m an anarchist, we don’t call anybody tankies.

Speak for yourself... anarchists are very prone to using that term to describe the technocratic left. I know, I'm one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm not against the hostility being shown towards tankies here... but it should be remembered that there are a lot of well-meaning and well-intentioned people who get caught up in the technocratic ideology tankies buy into. Let's face it... if you google anything about leftism you are more likely to end up reading about Marx and Engels than Bakunin or Goldman - and right-wing propaganda is as perfectly fine with conflating everything "leftist" with the technocratic (ie authoritarian) left as tankies themselves are.

If we are leaving some doors open for fascists and capitalists who turn against their programming, we should remember to do the same for tankies.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

As someone who's read Marx and lenin, and Bakunin and Goldman... not to mention kroptikin(god damn that guy bullshat his way through conquest of bread)

The anarchists always decry practical steps that are needed for the transition, but they have a poverty of ideas when it comes to propose better alternative solutions to the problems faced by actual revolutions. And frankly, reading their literature I understand why. They're still hung up on ideas and values and not material analysis much more than MLs. They're still trapped within liberal hegemonic thought though they are against liberal capitalism.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Neither the anarchist revolutions in Ukraine nor Spain seemed to lack "practical steps"... what they did lack, however, was practical steps for turning into a reactionary elite as soon as they seized power - something the Bolsheviks and their ideological spawn seems to have no problems with.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They absolutely did, their inability to coordinate and make compromises during wartime absolutely led to their failures as revolutions.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Oh... being (respectively) stabbed in the back by Bolsheviks and being sabotaged by Stalin had absolutely nothing to do with it, eh?

No, tankie... I don't think you've read any anarchist literature at all.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, the Spanish anarchists were unsuccessful because Stalin, and not because they refused to be integrated with the popular front(which even the fucking liberals joined), including militarily until the war was already well lost, which made coordinated actions against the fascists with the popular front impossible

The lessons of the Spanish civil war dont reflect well on the anarchist movement there.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Yes, the Spanish anarchists were unsuccessful because Stalin

Yes. That's why, tankie. And no... they didn't lose because they decided not to take orders from your outrageously incompetent and cynical two-faced realpolitking fetish object Stalin.

Okay?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fritz@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Bro what, if we can stop leftist infighting for one fucking minute that would be great. We all have 90% of the same goals so how about we work on that and not build artificial walls to those to the left of us. Also being pro western „democracy“ is cringe.

[–] sharebear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You're not to the left of us.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Define tankie. I've seen that work be used in so many different contexts that it seems to have lost all meaning. This are word has been used to describe so many different things by people that don't know what it means that now it has lost all meaning.

Similar case for the word "Authoritarian"Same story goes for the word "authoritarian". I've seen that word being defined as "When government uses it's authority to stop you from doing something", but by that logic any society with laws and law enforcement is authoritarian. This are word has been used to describe so many different things by people that don't know what it means that now it has lost all meaning.

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Based AF

Fuck tankies

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

196 is one of the greatest ~~subs~~ communities

ya'll should be proud. Thank you for adding a little queer fun to my normal CIS life

load more comments
view more: next ›