this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
23 points (96.0% liked)

196

16732 readers
2375 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Remember kids, Tankies wants to undermine democracy - same as facists.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just like fascists, tankies could theoretically hang out here without getting the boot. It's just that genocide denying authoritarians cannot be tolerated in a tolerant, democratic society. The reason tankies and fascists get the boot is because they can't resist trying to bully and intimidate those that find their views abhorrent. They simply can't resist being terrible.

They're cultists with views that can't stand up to scrutiny, so they need use other tactics to spread their shit and gain power. They use the real downsides and weaknesses of democracy to argue we need an even worse system. Then they argue you actually hold the worst views of their enemies, even though they usually support exactly the same things that make those enemies bad. Tankies claim you're a free-market liberal for opposing them, when the countries they support are state capitalists. Fascists claim you're against freedom of speech, while they are always trying to ban ideas they hate. Some of them are misguided and believe their own lies, but others are just awful people.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Tankies traditionally are associated with communists, but today's tankies (even those that call themselves communists) are really after authoritarianism than communism, and given the history of the name (that they supported using tracks on civilians). I don't think they're is much difference between current communists and current fascists, both groups seem to support authoritarianism and feels like term "tankies" fits both of them well.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, when it comes to the axis from authoritarian to anarchist. Things all tend to narrow in to a single point at either end. In regards to authoritarians, it's all about the hierarchy and holding power for themselves. They don't give a shit what form of government sits under that. When it comes to anarchists and libertarians, no government other than a largely flat form of socialism is acceptable. Simply because they are focused on freedoms both individual and social. And large monolithic hierarchies tend to get in the way of that.

And when I use the term libertarian I of course mean actual libertarians. Not temporarily embarrassed Republicans, or teenage capitalists. The easiest test to find out whether someone might accidentally be a libertarian or not. Is to find out if they belong to the Libertarian party, or ever plan to vote for their candidates. No one who would ever do that could ever be a libertarian lol

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

those "libertarians" are just anarcho-capitalists who think the issue isn't the system itself but they couldn't get access to the pie soon enough and get a bigger piece than everyone else so they think we should do a reset do this time they can come out on top

it's enough to look at how Crypto works with it's deflationary system where first buyers are much stronger than late comers or the MOAS /ape crowd

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Though even calling them in Arco capitalist is still to generous and a blight to the term anarchist. (I've met a few anarchists that were too idealistic and unreasonable for their own good. But they are generally pretty chill, reasonable people otherwise.) They are no true libertarians. Actual libertarians push not just for freedom from things like government. But also the freedom for everyone in society to be able to do the things they desire. One without the other is not a libertarian.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate it when threads like this make me have to repeatedly post the mainstream Jewish holocaust historian "stop conflating fascism and communism" article

https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

[–] the_inebriati@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you aware how obnoxious it is to spam a 5,000 word article while refusing to provide any summation or distillation of its thesis?

[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Paste it into ChatGPT if you're having reading challenges

[–] the_inebriati@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd like to respond, but I'm going to need you to read 5,000 words on my personal philosophy towards online commenting before I do.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I learned about a week ago why they are the way they are. See the soviet union was the closest in their mind the world has ever come to communism, so even though it's fallen into fascist oligarchy, they still hold hope that the anticommunist putin is going to rise up and reestablish global communism once more. The only problem with that is that... well Russia doesn't want communism. This is their playbook Yeah, that doesn't look socialist, that looks like "we tried communism it didn't work so lets do fascism this time" so they end up throwing their support towards red flavored fascism since it's the best chance (in their minds) at getting global communism. When the alternative is an american nazi world order, or tiny countries with no power, you don't really have much choice.

But here's something I want every single one of you to realize having read all of that: Even the most fascist redfash still would have killed the nazis. The same cannot be said for the average (in-power) liberal today. Anticommunism is always pro-fascism. Never let your critiques of the left turn into support for the right.

EDIT: Case in point, the person i'm responding to is never going to see this post because they're on a nazi bar instance that banned me.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Even the most fascist redfash still would have killed the nazis.

They'd kill who they define as nazis. I find that tankies' (especially Hexbear) definition of nazism doesn't entirely correspond to mine or that of most other people. So this is not something to be super optimistic about.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is a bare minimum that the current world order can't even pass. They can't even go a week without funding a mass ethnic genocide.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I really have no idea what people are trying to say or getting at in a lot of these comments, it feels like one of those art experiments where words don't have meaning but are used to express emotion

Lol redfash killing nazis isn't worth praise. Redfash kill each other the first chance they get. They are so paranoid when they come to power they purge anyone and everyone they can.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

so even though it’s fallen into fascist oligarchy,

You know any left wing project after being overthrown by the US would also end up a fascist oligarchy right? As was the case with the illegal and undemocratic dissolution of the Soviet Union brought about by the US.

Even the most fascist redfash

A mainstream Jewish holocaust scholar on equating fascism and communism and why it is bad

https://jewishcurrents.org/the-double-genocide-theory

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I was making a point that even the most "fascist" communist is still a zillion times less fascist than your average liberal. I love that you brought that article because it reinforces my point that anti-communism is always pro-fascism.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The users are a mixed bag but the mods/admins absolutely are in the business of running a nazi bar. They're doing the classic strategy of passively protecting fascists while actively suppressing those calling out the fascists. They also ban people who are open communists.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meanwhile, .ml keeps banning my accounts for just commenting on c/worldnews these days.

I'm not a troll. You can go look at my contributions. I made some hexbears look like idiots and now they've got me on a leash.

[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Slaps Table Thank You!

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait but I'm a communist. As in communes first, no state, no hierarchy, collective ownership, and all that jazz. I'm not super well read on the theory. Its really easy to see the difference, we're not splitting hairs here.

[–] Val@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That is why I use anarchist instead. It means all of that while also making it clear that authoritarianism is not ok.