this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
165 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19033 readers
2369 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

LEBANON, Ohio (WCMH) — Ohio’s Republican candidate for U.S. Senate questioned why a certain group of women would be concerned about abortion during an event in the state.

NBC4 obtained a video recording from a Warren County town hall on Friday, where GOP Senate hopeful Bernie Moreno accused suburban women of being focused solely on their ability to get an abortion. 

“You know, the left has a lot of single issue voters,” Moreno said. “Sadly, by the way, there’s a lot of suburban women, a lot of suburban women that are like, ‘Listen, abortion is it. If I can’t have an abortion in this country whenever I want, I will vote for anybody else.’ … OK. It’s a little crazy by the way, but — especially for women that are like past 50 — I’m thinking to myself, ‘I don’t think that’s an issue for you.'”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 89 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

It’s a little crazy by the way, but — especially for women that are like past 50 — I’m thinking to myself, ‘I don’t think that’s an issue for you.'

Hey assbag, those women over 50 have daughters, granddaughters, goddaughters, step-daughters, daughters-in-law, sisters, nieces, cousins, and (in at least two situations I personally know of) aunts who are younger than them who this would be an issue for. And not to mention all the men and NBs in their lives who support them and their health.

So go fuck yourself.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

What's crazy to me is that they think that men don't care about it either.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would a man care about his wife bleeding In a car with doctors refusing to help? Can't he just get another one from the lady store? /s

No, women are traditionally stored in binders. You have to slide them out of that plastic protector thingy.

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

I have a 15 month old.. I live in a red state with an abortion ban that started as a trigger law.

The entire pregnancy I told my wife I'll choose her Everytime and if we don't get the care she needs.. we will find it.

Bodily autonomy was always important to me. My wife potentially dying and the maga government not caring has pushed me as far left as I need to go to always vote blue.

Wife and kiddo were fine, 0 complications. We were fortunate. Not everyone is as lucky.

[–] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 11 points 2 weeks ago

It was the response from a lot of people to COVID precautions that made me realize that a disturbing number of people are completely lacking in empathy, and don't even understand it as a concept. They're the people who truly did not understand why a person who isn't at personal risk of complications would still do thinks like distance, wear a mask, or get vaccinated, because most of the benefits involve stopping the spread to others.

This is exactly the same thing. Not only do they not care about other people, they genuinely do not understand the others do.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

He can’t picture someone having community and love, and caring about issues that might not affect them directly for selfish reasons.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I don't have to be related to someone to be able to imagine what life would be like in their shoes, how what I would want to do if in their position might affect others, and ultimately whether or not we should ban something, provide aid for something, or ignore something.

The republican electorate seems largely incapable of doing that, and that's why republican officials act surprised when people vote for the good of anyone other than themselves.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

[Moreno said] It’s a little crazy by the way, but — especially for women that are like past 50 — I’m thinking to myself, ‘I don’t think that’s an issue for you.

This is a perfect encapsulation of the conservative mindset. "If X isn't applying to you, why do you care?" Project that across so many issues and you see the conservative viewpoint:

  • "I don't experience climate change that I'm aware of yet, so there's no reason to do anything about it"
  • "I'm not homosexual, so I don't care that homosexuals have fewer rights."
  • "I don't have kids struggling with nutrition, so why do I want any programs that help nutrition for poor kids?"
  • "I don't have a uterus, so don't care I don't have control over my own body"

Moreno is essentially saying that empathy should be absent in the conservative mind.

[–] luminaree@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, and they think everyone thinks that way. It's like when JD Vance said that people who are childless have no investment in the future, as if we have no reason to care about the future of society without kids of our own.

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure he would agree, but he's also lacking in empathy to the extent that he actually doesn't personally understand.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The foundation of sociopathy, really.

[–] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 50 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

It's not just abortion. Republicans are openly entertaining the idea of jailing women for having miscarriages which is a natural bodily function that happens sometimes.

Imagine if Republicans wanted to lock you up in prison for a bodily function you have no control over, you'd get angry too.

[–] flamingarms@feddit.uk 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They're not entertaining the idea; they've already executed it. Women have already been arrested for miscarriages in multiple states.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59214544

They certainly are. Fucking christofascism.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

which is a natural bodily function that happens sometimes

Its much more common for women trying to have children than most understand it to be.

"Among 53,479 different women admitted to labor and delivery ward, 43% of women reported having had 1 or more first trimester spontaneous miscarriages" source

So 43%, nearly half of women, that eventually bring a pregnancy to term have experienced at least one just in the first trimester.

Notice that this risk of being jailed only applies to women.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

This is the result of really terrible sex ed. I learned about miscarriages in eighth grade. Scared the hell out of me thinking of a dead body inside me, and I don't even have a uterus.

Let me tell you, informing kids of all the things that can go wrong with a pregnancy is some damn effective contraception.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Welcome to being black

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Also last year we legalized abortion here by ballot measure to the constitution. Ohio wants abortion

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Farting declared illegal in Arkansas

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Miscarriages are insanely common, to the point where you are talking about jailing a majority of women. Do you actually believe that they want to do this? That's like cartoon-villian level of evil and so extreme that it's astonishing to me that people find this kind of hysteria so easy to believe. This place blows my mind sometimes with how much of an echo chamber it is.

[–] sfbing@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Yes, I do. And yes, it is evil. It has already started in red states. That's why we are against it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Crazy how people are worried about the rights of others

And it's not just abortion, it's a matter of being able to make a decision about your own body without the Government telling you what you can/can't do.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

You know, he's not wrong, I'm a single issue left voter. As long as a fascist dictator is on the ballot I simply can't vote for them.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

the left has a lot of single issue voters

Really, because it's difficult to find a right-wing voter whose "freedoms" they seem to go bonkers over is guns.

Seriously, next time a right-winger s is shouting about the "freedoms" others are taking away, ask em to name 1 of those freedoms...that isn't guns.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago

"Bernie’s view is that women voters care just as much about the economy, rising prices, crime and our open southern border"

Economy: almost crashed into a recession because of Trump ignoring covid

Rising prices: because the Republicans killed the price gouging act

Crime: at like 50 year lows

Open border: because Trump had the Republicans kill the Border deal that Sen Langford (a hardcore republican) negotiated and got everything the Republicans wanted.

But yes. Tell millions of women they are crazy.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 weeks ago

Most people would become a single issue voter if that issue is "would you like to live?"

[–] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, please keep talking. Keep proudly expressing your platform is to deny women self determination. Good strategy.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago

Bold move to say this in a state where we just put an amendment in about it that passed with 57% of the vote.

But seriously, this guy is an asshole anyway that steals from his employees.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the guy who said women over 50 should not have an opinion. Wow.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Where the fuck does he think the women under fifty fucking came from?

We've got 4 daughters. You'd better fucking believe their human rights are important to us. Do they think agency and autonomy are fucking academic issues to women?

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t think he realized that he shouldn’t say the GOP briefing points out loud

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

Say it louder and prouder please. Maybe it will effect my in laws

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, yes, another old white man who wants to control women. I am so sick of this shit.

[–] Soup@lemmy.cafe 12 points 2 weeks ago

People vote against fascism….

“These damned single-issue voters!”

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Keep talking. Senator brown needs another 6 years

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Is this ghoul trying to set simultaneous records in condescension, hypocrisy and contempt for women?

Because if he is, it's a good attempt and if he's trying to do literally anything else, it's an abysmal effort 🤬

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

It's just projection they know that they're in base or single issue voters against abortion. The speech is simply a tool to make sure they remember that and they stay on the line.

load more comments
view more: next ›