this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024

186 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19170 readers

4559 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

outrageousmatter@lemmy.world

aidan@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

186

Biden resists allies’ calls to exit race after debate performance: ‘I know I’m not a young man’ (www.latimes.com)

submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/politics@lemmy.world

109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 76 points 4 months ago (17 children)

The discourse around Biden exiting the race is moot because the only one who decides if he continues is Biden. Biden is still running so nothing changes. Biden is who we need to vote for to keep our democracy.

Biden had a bad debate performance. It was a missed opportunity to pick up new voters. Biden demoralized his base. But we're still stuck with him, because there is no external mechanism to stop him from running.

The most effective tool we have to prevent the christo-fascist takeover this November is voting. The debate did not change that.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the only one who decides if he continues is Biden.

Got it.

Biden is who we need to vote for to keep our democracy.

Um, what? Vote Biden to save Democracy, and fuck you if you want a different candidate.

I'll vote for Biden's corpse in 2028 if it's still the only way to keep Trump out of the Whitehouse, but give up the "save Democracy" schtick. That ship has sailed. Democracy is dead, and it's not just the Republican's fault.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Democracy is still alive for now. That's why voting matters. Our flawed democracy is still our best chance at adverting fascism. Which is why the fascists want to take it away. Giving up early gets us nothing. So keep fighting.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (17 children)

I think his point is that, if our only alternative to fascism is to vote for a senile old man who was forced upon voters without a primary, then this system can't credibly be called democracy.

load more comments (17 replies)

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand this chain of logic why we need to keep Biden:

Biden isn't the best candidate.
Only Biden can drop (false)
Biden will never make the adult decision to retire.
We have to plow forward with Biden because he'll never change his mind on anything.

Like, the argument for why Biden has to stay, is just reasons he shouldn't stay...

And it's not just up to him. It's up to the DNC.

We are not stuck with Biden.

Biden and the DNC just know that's the only way people will vote for him, so they've been reporting it for like 5 years now.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Only Biden can drop

This is a true statement. Biden won the primary. The delegates are pledged to him. Biden is the one who has to decide if he drops out.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the DNC, known for making good decisions for our democracy. How they trusted Hillary on us leading to the election of Trump.

We just need ranked choice voting at a national scale. Until that happens we're going to keep dealing with this bullshit. A lot of Republicans don't want to elect a fascist anymore than a lot of democrats don't want to elect a geriatric. But just like democrats a lot of those Republicans think they have no choice. These could all have been avoided with a different voting system and the more moderate members of each party could have voted together.

I agree with you, but the system is just fucking broken.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The guy didn't ace a debate with a sore throat and jet-lag so the media loses its shit. The orange liar has rape and 34 felony convictions- crickets. Nothing new here.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I searched for an editorial board opinion in the New York Times which said Trump should withdraw from the Republican ticket because he lied throughout the debate, but I couldn't find one. Why didn't they write one?

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Because the media is complicit and owned by the same oligarchs that have taken control of our country.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There are two standards. Everyone expects Republicans to be lying shitheads so when they are, no one is surprised.

We somehow just accept this.

[–] match@pawb.social 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

sounds like the party is dysfunctional if we can't replace a candidate with 120 days of leadup. that's longer than any other country's election season. the inability of the democratic party to do good things on purpose makes a strong argument against their leadership if what they think they offer is competence

[–] mal3oon@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I thought the 2016 Bernie debacle was enough of a learning moment for the Democrats, yet 8 years go so long for memory lane. Biden is barely functional, anyone with old grandparents know how fast things accelerate, how is he even going to last 5 more years with that mental capacity? Isn't this at the end blind party loyalty, the same thing the republicans are criticized for? I guess rules for thee but not for me.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

The Democratic Party is still the best option when the only viable alternative is a christo-fascist party.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I'm running on an independent ticket. My platform: Unlike the other two candidates no one wonders if I can physically handle the journey from back stage to the podium.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can the party not compel him to step down and elect a more healthy replacement.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

There is no mechanism at this stage that can force him to do so that I am aware of. They can of course try to convince him, but no one from Biden's inner circle, like Jill Biden, or any of the hypothetical candidates people like to float, like Gavin Newsom, has expressed interest in doing that.

load more comments (11 replies)

[–] Rottcodd@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I pessimistically expected that.

If he bowed out and the Dems nominated a halfway decent candidate (which they likely wouldn't do, but that's a different subject), they'd demolish Trump. He'd lose so badly he couldn't even pretend it was fraudulent (though of course he'd claim that anyway, since he has the emotional maturity of a spoiled five-year-old). The race would instantly go from a terrifying risk to a complete rout.

But between Biden's ego and the DNC's determination to stick with a wholly-owned establishment neoliberal hack at all costs - even if it means losing - I expected that they wouldn't take this golden opportunity.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

On the stream of the debate I was watching, when they took a break they showed clips from previous debates and the difference was kind of mind-blowing.

I honestly kind of think that even a mid-level candidate who didn't make it like Romney or Kerry probably could have mopped the floor with either one of them.

Also as a side note, how lucky is Donald Trump? Just a whole life of being handed infinite money no matter how many times he fucked up a business, a bewildering assortment of crimes with essentially no hard consequences, and two presidential runs against pretty much the only two people he has any chance of beating in a debate.

He's had a life of almost non-stop softballs. It's kind of wild really.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well he's had the KGB in Russian mining oligarchs looking out for him for the last 40 years.

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

But between Biden's ego and the DNC's determination to stick with a wholly-owned establishment neoliberal hack at all costs - even if it means losing - I expected that they wouldn't take this golden opportunity.

Biden has objectively been the most progressive president since LBJ, and the most effective progressive president since FDR. And he did it with about the slimmest possible congressional margins, a situation which would have made it very easy for an actual "establishment neoliberal hack" to say "my hands are tied" and accomplish nothing of substance. Instead we got the biggest climate reform package ever, the biggest infrastructure package since the Interstate Highway system, a child tax credit that massively reduced child poverty, the most significant industrial policy in decades (CHIPS and Science), a veritable bulldog FTC chair with an aggressive anti-monopoly stance, and that's just for starters.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

This is simply fan fic.

[–] jettrscga@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Who exactly? I think you underestimate the power of being an incumbent.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 4 months ago

You're not wrong. Some truths are inconvenient and unpopular, but they're not wrong.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago (5 children)

“I know I’m not a young man, to state the obvious,” the 81-year-old Biden said Friday. “I don’t walk as easy as I used to. I don’t speak as smoothly. I don’t debate as well as I used to. But I know what I do know. I know how to tell the truth. I know right from wrong and I know how to do this job.”

trump didn't think he was wrong when he was breaking human rights laws on our southern border.

And Biden apparently doesn't either now that he's doing it.

My point being the people who do evil shit, usually dont think of themselves as evil.

The problem with Biden, is on issues like Israel where the vast majority of not only his party but the country won't him him to calm the fuck down. He never will

Because he is absolutely sure his outdated morals are the best, and he's not listening to anyone that disagrees with him.

[–] smokin_shinobi@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This gonna be the first time you have to choose between the lesser of two evils?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Personally, that has been the only way I've ever been able to fucken vote and I'm sick of it.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The lesser of two evils is exactly how we fucking got her in the first place.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (7 children)

You get a chance to vote for your dream candidate in the primary.

If they're not on the ballot in the general, that's because other voters didn't find your dream candidate so dreamy.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

They know and they love it.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, the greater evil would presumably have gotten us worse. And in a system that is set up so as to inevitably produce two viable parties, and where "good" is not on the ballot from either, what else do you expect people to do?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

change it, naturally.

contrary to popular belief, this system only lasts as long as we allow it to last.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 10 points 4 months ago

"just change the system" is easier said than done, which I suspect you realize of course, since if it were so easy, you'd have changed it yourself already. The difficulty in such change is that it requires a very large number of people to act in unison, which is quite rare, especially when most people aren't literally starving, and have different ideas over what they want the system to be, some of which might be better, but some of which might be as bad or worse. It's a bit like how libertarian types sometimes remark that, if everyone stopped paying taxes, the government would run out of money and be unable to enforce them anymore: technically true, but requires humans to act with uncharacteristic unity towards a singular goal, against pushback from established power. Not to say that it never happens, but it does not seem to happen reliably or in a way that can be readily forced to occur.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That quote is so stupid.

"yeah I'm in cognitive and physical decline, but I'm totally capable of leading one of the most powerful and influential nations in history. Trust me bro."

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

You're not wrong........but the other option is trump.

We're all fucked.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

At least he sounded a lot more energetic and present in this speech. What happened on stage?

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Didn't have a teleprompter on stage

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You also don't really need to think for a speech. You've got a friendly audience who won't challenge you and you know exactly what the next topic is, so you can focus on inflection and timing and emotion. It's good to see him have some life in the speech, but it's not really much of a counter to his terrible debate performance.

And incidentally, that's probably why Trump's performance sounded better. He also didn't really need to think about substance because he was just speaking to whatever topic he felt like and making things up without concern for truthfulness or challenge.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I think he was just sick on an unlucky day.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Biden could commit to only serving one more year and let the VP pick go to a brokered convention.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Biden has already committed to serving four more years.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

He has to put up a strong front at this point, to keep the confidence of voters. But he could absolutely resign a year in... either planned or due to some new development, e.g. illness.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments