this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
295 points (97.7% liked)

World News

38531 readers
1867 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel’s military has said it was highly likely its troops fired the shot that killed Ayşenur Ezgi Eygi, the American-Turkish woman killed at a protest in the occupied West Bank.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said her death was unintentional and expressed deep regret.

The statement came as Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, called the killing of the 26-year-old last week “unprovoked and unjustified”.

Speaking on a diplomatic visit to London, Blinken told journalists that Eygi’s death showed the Israeli security forces needed to make fundamental changes to their rules of engagement.

MBFC
Archive

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ComfortableRaspberry 20 points 6 days ago

Petition to rename the IDF to Israel Death Force

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Yeah, we killed her. We'd killher again if we could. Whatcha gonna do about it?"

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Biden-Harris administration will say they are troubled and then provide $3 billion more to Israel.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Make no mistake - Trump would do that and more.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If both parties are for it, how can anyone be against it?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The country is more than a president.

The biggest change isn't going to come from the top, it's going to come from the bottom. Support local and state reps that share your values, they're far more likely to get elected than a federal position, and have a much more direct impact on peoples daily lives (and ability to support reps at the federal level).

[–] actually@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I live near the bottom, and I see a lot of anti Palestinian stuff, mostly pretending the Palestinians do not exist, with a random anti-Semitic accusation thrown it.

And it’s not just the democrats, I see this in many western nations. It’s a stain on many parties who speak many languages.

If the killings stopped today , this would be only a black mark against those involved. Something to get angry about by many. Accusing fingers could be pointed. Perhaps even reevaluation by some.

But we are only a quarter through the genocide. This will last months or years more. Many will be killed in the future. So this is an active crime scene. Those that will have fingers pointed at later are still doing harm now, and will do harm in the future.

Not just the high level politicians, but in all levels of each country. There is collective guilt , and that is not ended either

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Ah, so might as well just revel in it instead of doing something to make the world a better place in the mean time.

Stop focusing so much on what you can't change, and how horrible it is for you, and focus on what you can.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Yet, there are articles specifically about Trump wanting Russia to win. Should we stop those articles because a country is more than the president?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but what if I'm only politically aware for half a year every 4 years? Voting for the president is all I can do! /s

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

The sad truth is, give us someone who does. Who stands a chance. Then and only then will that discussion matter. Till then, not making things abjectly worse is sadly the best option. And we can push to improve from there. As opposed to trying to push to improve from a worse position in 4 years time.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who stands a chance.

First they came for the Palestinians and I said nothing, because I didn't want to ruin anyone's electoral chances.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

First of all its ghoulishly disingenuous for you to conflate providing arms. Which is wrong I'm not justifying that. To actually killing people. That's straight up empty virtue signaling and not solving or convincing anyone of anything.

I asked who stands a chance. And you quoted it without even answering it. Useless. Right now the only viable option other than R or D in the presidential campaign is a widespread general uprising. Which I'm all for. If you got one let's go kiddo. But I got news for you. If you don't. What you're doing is empty virtue signaling that only helps the worst people around. And makes enemies of possible allies. Which is how I know your words are empty.

[–] Saleh 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

First of all its ghoulishly disingenuous for you to conflate providing arms. Which is wrong I’m not justifying that. To actually killing people.

You do know that if you provide a weapon with the knowledge that the person will use it to kill someone, you can get convicted for being an accessory to that murder, which entails the same criminal punishment?

So for normal crime it is absolutely considered to be on the same level

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yes but accessory to murder is different. That's why it's called accessory to murder. IBM and Dow Chemical supplied Nazi Germany knowing full well exactly what Germany was going to use their products for. They weren't charged with murder. Unfortunately they weren't even charged with accessory to murder. They should have been charged with something.

They're actually are legitimate reasons to send arms to israel. The problem is that while those legitimate reasons do exist. The fact that the current leadership especially. But pretty much all leadership of Israel has been bigoted and genocidal it conflicts heavily. But again it isn't some black and white situation as people want to make it out to be. I wish it were.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is ghoulishly disingenuous to suggest that a nation making their 500th shipment of child-exploding munitions to a genocidal warlord is somehow less culpable.

Biden is like a negligent parent, letting his mentally disturbed 14-year-old have access to the family assault rifle. Maybe after the first shooting he could havd a credible defense. But by now Netanyahu is on his 2000th school shooting, and Biden is still providing weapons.

Biden might as well be shooting those Palestinian children himself, the blood is on his hands.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No it isn't. I'm not saying it's right. I'll criticize it all the time. American companies like IBM and Dow Chemical helped facilitate the Nazis genocide. They were not charged for murder or treated as murderers. Despite knowing exactly what their products were being used for. And the fact that please uses would generally not be considered Justified or acceptable. Only profitable. Sending arms to Israel right now especially is a horrible idea they're current leadership are genocytomaniacs. But there is legitimate reason to arm Israel historically speaking I'm not saying that I agree with it. But just saying that there is some acceptability even so the situation is very different on many fronts.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps this is the crux of our disagreement, because I think it is obvious that IBM, Dow, et al. should have been prosecuted for their role in the holocaust.

Our modern would would be much better off if these evil companies had faced justice, instead of allowing them to normalize their inhumanity.

Sadly our ancestors did not eradicate fascism, they just postponed it. We should learn from their weakness and their mistakes as we wage our modern fight against fascism.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They should have been prosecuted at the very least. Realistically capitalism should be rained in as a whole. Because it is their duty to do such things in similar cases. But there is a difference. But that doesn't change facts. They didn't commit genocide. They enabled it. Which is bad and a crime unto itself. But it's different which is why we tack The extra word onto it. So no our disagreement comes from the fact that so many people want to imply that aiding and abetting or enabling genocide is the exact same thing as having done it yourself. It's not and never has been and never will be.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think you're splitting hairs here.

The difference between "aiding and abetting" and "comitting" are vanishingly small. Both crimes deserve the most severe condemnation, both crimes deserve the most severe punishment.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Hey that's your opinion and your welcome to it. It's not supported by facts evidence or reality. But that's never stopped anyone.

Inevitably. Every single time with people like you this is always what it comes down to. Not a genuine discussion or anything even resembling. Someone agrees with you 99%. But they don't grind the same pet axe that you grind. Or feel the same need to misrepresent facts as you do. All of a sudden you feel this deep urge. A need to tell someone whose Family actually survived genocide at the hands of the United States what genocide is. What I said was not to defend the United states. It was to not downplay what genocide is. The United States plenty guilty of genocide elsewhere. They're not committing genocide in this case they are enabling it. And that's horrible wrong should be charged prosecuted etc etc etc etc etc. It's not genocide.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In a new research briefing submitted to the U.S. government today as part of the National Security Memorandum on Safeguards and Accountability with Respect to Transferred Defense Articles and Defense Services (NSM-20) process, Amnesty International USA details civilian deaths and injuries with U.S.-made weapons, as well as other cases that highlight an overall pattern of unlawful attacks by Israeli forces. The briefing also details practices by Israeli forces inconsistent with best practices for mitigating civilian harm and provides clear examples of the misuse of defense articles, the commission of torture, and the use of unlawful lethal force. Lastly, the briefing also details the denial of humanitarian assistance to the civilian population of Gaza.

“It’s shocking that the Biden administration continues to hold that the government of Israel is not violating international humanitarian law with U.S.-provided weapons when our research shows otherwise and international law experts disagree,” said Amanda Klasing, National Director for Government Relations with Amnesty International USA. “The International Court of Justice found the risk of genocide in Gaza is plausible and ordered provisional measures. President Biden must end U.S. complicity with the government of Israel’s grave violations of international law and immediately suspend the transfer of weapons to the government of Israel.”

“The evidence is clear and overwhelming: the government of Israel is using U.S.-made weapons in violation of international humanitarian and human rights law, and in a manner that is inconsistent with U.S. law and policy, said Klasing. “In order to follow U.S. laws and policies, the United States must immediately suspend any transfer of arms to the government of Israel.”

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's doesn't rebut anything I said. But it is what I expect from leninists. Especially someone who would proudly associate with a monster-like Stalin. A wall of text that has nothing to do with anything.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I did accidentally respond to the wrong comment. It was in response to when you said:

First of all its ghoulishly disingenuous for you to conflate providing arms. Which is wrong I'm not justifying that. To actually killing people. That's straight up empty virtue signaling and not solving or convincing anyone of anything.

This is not analogous to a murder case. When it comes to International and US Law, the US is complicit in the genocide because we are actively providing the arms being used for said genocide.

Also, I'm not a leninist nor a stalinist.

I'm a leftist and I'm very anti-authoritian. I even explicitly state that in my profile. The name is just an edgy pun.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I asked who stands a chance.

The people who collect the most corporate PAC money, obviously. So these are the only people it is reasonable to support.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

False. PAC money can't overcome first past the post and the Electoral college. Even if we gave a third party candidate 100% of the pack money. They wouldn't win. Because of how the system works.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Parties have changed in the past. It's not impossible. We used to have a Whig party, for example.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

But there have always largely been two main parties. The system of the Electoral College and first pass the post have always seen to that. The names change. But the internals look a lot more I like them people would like to admit.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

What is the logic for supporting 99% Hitler when you could actually choose to work against 99% Hitler and Hitler himself? This is genocide, not a marginal tax bracket you can lesser evil about. The systematic destruction of a people is as bad as it gets, generally speaking.

If you support this and tell other people to vote for it, you are complicit.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just want to point out how interesting it is that this comment called it the “Biden-Harris administration.” Interesting.

[–] squirrels@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee -3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Just saying. That specific framing at this specific time? I know it’s a fairly common way of referencing the admin—for an NYT story. But it was just very, very telling for some random internet comment to call it that in reference to this situation at this time. It just seemed very much like showing the commenter’s hand. Subtle, but painfully apparent.

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

So you’re making up things in your mind and then attributing those things to the commenter?

Your comment says far more about you than it does anyone else. You make ‘jumping to conslusions’ seem like a child’s game.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said her death was unintentional and expressed deep regret.

We're Sorry

[–] zeephirus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what they said was. we didnt mean to murder that one. it was one of the other unarmed protesters we meant to murder. The other one was only Palestinian so chill... they dont matter remember!

[–] Saleh 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Pretty much they mean "we say sorry if you keep letting us do it".

Now they will know if they can get away with it and subsequently kill more international peace activists to push the remaining ones out, so they can go back to murdering Palestinians without holding back.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

Didn't they already kill those World Kitchen aid workers? They already know they can get away with it.

[–] zeephirus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

its called terrorism....

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Hey... what's a little murder between geopolitical allies of convenience...

[–] joeynotjoe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Fuck this “war”. We are so far gone it’s deeply disturbing.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Yeah, in fact that was probably Steve, crazy mother fucker is always shooting into crowds thinking he sees Hamas".

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

"Man I really wish Steve would stop doing that!

Anyway, here you go Steve I loaded a few more magazines for you, try not to hit innocents this time haha"

load more comments
view more: next ›