The actual creators have long been paid for their work when a film/series releases, the only people who profit from the sales are those who own the IP, which is usually the production company (and the actors sometimes, if they decided to take a gamble and agreed on recieving royalties instead of signing a fixed contract. Or rarely the director, if their name alone can sell a film)

unless it's like a fully indie film, self made, self produced, and self published, people who made the thing never see the sales money

& there is very little inbetween those two extremes, only thing that comes to my mind is works either commissioned by, or sold to a streaming service (& most of the time creators lose the IP rights if they do that).

so far the only exception to all this bullshit that i know of is Nebula

[–] psud@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Nebula

Fun thing about that service is that it was started by a group of YouTube creators who started by making an advertising service that was designed to share profit fairly (as opposed to their competition which aimed to extract as much money from advertisers and as much as they could from YouTube channels)

After the adpocalypse they started a competing video service with similar ethics (Nebula)

If Simon Whistler put his channels on nebula, I'd hardly use YouTube for anything but music

This is the Wendover video on the subject

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think what I love most about this model is that rather than remove their main videos from YouTube (I know there's a bunch of bonus content and originals), they keep them on there and pay out creators the same as for any other sponsor spot. It makes the barrier to entry much lower for new creators, but it also means YouTube is basically subsidising their ad-free tier for them. I genuinely believe that decision is one of the reasons they've been so successful, compared to some similar video services that are fully gatekept with their content. Dropout being the notable exception.

At the end of the day, I guess it proves the point that piracy is often about reasonable and affordable access. I'm happy to pay Nebula my money because it's actually going to the creatives involved. Or it's getting spent on awesome originals, without having to appeal to some braindead media executive (they currently split things 50/50). I don't have to worry about being a product either, as YouTube still gathers your watch history to sell ads on Google's other platforms.

They also bothered right at the start to set things up so they can never become a faceless corporation exploiting creatives, because it's a co-op between all of the creators. They did sell a minority stake at one point to CuriosityStream to raise capital for more originals and engineers for apps, but it required a vote amongst all of the creatives. They're already profitable too

(Sorry I realise you already know most/all of this, it's more for others reading these comments.)

[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your bracketed comment: that is the normal way of comment boards, I like intensifier comments like this. It's the "yes and" of the internet

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Cheers for saying so, I absolutely agree! I just often get people thinking I'm arguing instead, it feels like it's my autism making me seem a bit intense at times when I'm just info-dumping about a topic I like :)

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And also piracy does not automatically equal losing profits. If there is a show I want to watch, but I can't pirate it, then I simply don't watch it. And in this case, where the options are either me pirating the show or me not watching it at all, neither situation takes away profits from anyone nor gives anyone profits.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

and let's not forget that piracy still allows for the most powerful form of advertisement - word of mouth. You might've not paid to watch something, but if it was good and you recommended it to your friends, they might!

back in the old Internet days the music studio Two Steps From Hell gained popularity nearly exclusively through piracy. I'm not even sure if they sold any albums before the widespread reupload of their music happened. I myself found out about them from a long deleted anime music video. And I have since bought several of their CDs and saw them live in Europe (after fans have begged them for nearly a decade to go on a tour). Would I have known they even existed if their music wasn't spreading like illegal wildfire in the early 2010s? probably not, which would be a shame because they're one of my all time favourite band-thingies idk how to call them

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While they are still insufficient, residuals do exist. It's why SAG and WGA went on strike last year, since streaming residuals were (and to a degree still are) garbage. It's not as directly tied to sales as if they received points, but with Hollywood accounting that's a risk. Though if you're talking about Nebula, maybe this is more about YouTube creators which is a different can of worms.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, they're negligible enough that the fact they exist wasn't covered anywhere during my filmmaking degree, and i took all the extra business/law modules :')

And it was just the writers & actors right? What about all the editors, audio mixers, audio recorders, camera men, gaffers? riggers, vfx people, script supervisors, storyboard artists, props & costumes department, even runners! There's just so much work to be done by so many people to bring a script to life, and we're yet to hear of an editor/camera op/runner who lucked out by being a part of an accidentally famous billion dollar film and then never had to work again. Apart from producers, directors, actors, and writers sometimes - everyone's work, though essential for audio visual media to exist, is rarely rewarded with a share of the profits it makes

Nebula has been slowly surpassing just "rebranded youtube content" so to speak. They've started financing films and plays like for Abigail Thorn, and they're still true to their founding ethos. It's no longer just higher quality youtube content, and i do hope to see them one day become more widely known and popular

[–] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are very much as a whole not negligible. They can be--people can get checks for cents sometimes. But they wouldn't go on strike and sign a deal if it never amounted to anything. I'm not even in the industry and have a passing familiarity with the concept; I've just been reading about it and listening to people from it for years.

DGA also has residuals in their contract. IATSE might for some roles, but you can't feasibly give everyone involved in a production residuals. The point of residuals is to hold over people in roles that are very fickle and can go years between jobs, like everyday working actors and writers. If you're going years between jobs getting hired for craft services, your food might just suck.

It would be great if everyone could get a share, but that's not realistic. Big productions can have thousands of people who work on them. Having to send the carpenter on a film a check for two cents yearly would create insane administrative overhead. There has to be a line somewhere.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

that line sure is making it so the production company gets 95% of the profits.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They do take the money(taxes) that the population could have used. And they steal the land of other people and their lives and their families lives and put innocent people in guantanamo.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 month ago

The only troops I respect are people who seed 🫡

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago

truly the land of the free

[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago

Won't someone please think of the poor Hollywood studios?

[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 20 points 1 month ago

Can't make no content when ya dead.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Army don't kill people, bad people with armies kill people.

[–] swab148@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Generals gathered in their masses

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Like, I do get you're trying to make a joke, but this is actually true in my opinion? Especially enlisted service members. It's literally a crime for them to not do what they're told, and what they're told to do often is murder people. Officers have a lot more control but they're also required to follow orders. The people ultimately in charge are politicians, and I'd say most of the ones sending armies to war are bad people.

Inb4 someone says "why join up then?":

Conscription exists.
It's often the only choice to lift yourself and family* out of poverty for some people.
In the US they literally have army recruiters in high schools. 🤢

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

FUCKING HIGH SCHOOLS?? Those kids can't even pee without permission, yet somehow they are considered adult enough to be sent into the Middle East to kill people???????

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So thankful I didn't grow up there, I can't even imagine dealing with that on top of all the other high school angst.

Edit: I should say, you do have to be 18 to serve. But it's still indoctrinating kids into thinking that's all they'll be able to do to survive...

[–] _Cid_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't know how widespread this is, but in the german army it is illegal to follow an order if you think it violates human rights. They specifically wanted to make a law against the "I was just following orders" excuse, you're still guilty.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't be surprise if it were only Germany, due to the whole cultural guilt around WWII...

[–] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

It doesn’t prevent them from attracting a lot of neonazi’s and giving minimal (to no) punishment to said neonazi’s. It also hasn’t prevented then from committing war crimes in Afghanistan.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You're right, it was suppose to be a satire. But it's never one man...

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure firing squads for traitors and deserters exists.

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Okay, I agree and there should be a way to donate money to the creators of the shows without a cent going to these megacorps of entertainment. Screw the publisher, but the actual creators deserve credit and money.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

With the exception of bankable (and thus already rich) stars getting percentages as part of their contract, they've already been paid before the movie is released.

Whether or not you buy Dude, Where's My Car? has no effect on anyone who's not either the studio or stars who are paid a fortune already.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago

I wish piracy were stealing content. You created a movie? Nuh uh, that's mine now, fuck you.

[–] ealoe@ani.social 12 points 1 month ago

Piss off your local conservatives by telling them you support an organization that takes unskilled workers and gives them free housing, free healthcare, job training, cheap mortgages, and tax-advantaged income. When they start going on about how that sounds like some "commie bullshit" reveal that you've just described the US military. Your mileage (kilometerage?) may vary in countries with a functional healthcare system

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uh yeah.

That's kind of what you pay the Army for. To kill those people before they kill you.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uh which war was that?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The Civil War was that way. I'm not going to say everything the military has done was morally justified in the strictest defensive sense.