So they settled on their defamation case because the PAC was losing donations based on her counter-claims, but she never went after them legally for slander or anything related to claims.
Didn't they have photos of her and her profile website?
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
165 points (95.1% liked)
politics
18828 readers
4620 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yep. Had a profile and pics on sugardaddymeet.
Plus had another profile claiming she was an actress on Explore Talent. Which oddly enough so did Candice Owens. And a few other random people that have become GOP props. https://x.com/DelVeneto/status/1432793689848520704/photo/1
Screenshots for those who don't want to open xitter
Sooo... Boebert had 9 videos on that site. I hope they come out for a number of reasons.
This is just too good (or too bad depending on who you ask) to be true. I know they are conservative grifters, but I would believe the claim about Boebert and I doubt the rest.
Boy, wouldn't it be something if these awful human beings were literally paid actors/actresses? That makes everything in the world of politics incredibly distressing, yet I wouldn't be surprised one bit.
Imagine paying to fuck grandma BoeBo🤢🤮
It looks like she was just trying to win some shady modeling contest by creating a profile and uploading pictures
Settlements are just pricetags
"Nobody admits fault" is code for "give us enough money and we'll never publicly prove your guilt"
That article needs an editor, a lot of it doesn't make sense.
Sounds like it was written by AI.