workerONE

joined 1 year ago
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

We are? Charlie uses a dollar to buy the chocolate bar with the golden ticket. Also, who mentioned insurance? You are the first person to bring it up, saying it's not insurance... Okay it's not insurance but nobody said it was

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

A disability caused by work activity would be covered by worker's comp insurance.

Edit: in California all employees pay into state disability insurance. In the event they become disabled they could receive disability benefits from SDI. If someone were to claim to be disabled it would be disability fraud. Why are we even having this discussion and who cares?

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I have that setting but it's not enabled. It says "starting early summer 2025 we'll be building more personal experiences for you"

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Do you have a source that says he bet against his team? I've read that he bet on his own team but always to win https://www.espn.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/13114874/notebook-obtained-lines-shows-pete-rose-bet-baseball-player-1986 "The documents obtained by Outside the Lines, which reflect betting records from March through July 1986, show no evidence that Rose, who was a player-manager in 1986, bet against his team."

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I want to see what happens to his personal assistant. Employer employee relationships have a certain power dynamic and when the employer is paying the employee and tells them to get him drugs (I think this is what happened? IDK) how much blame can you put on the person?

 
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's a good article though and provides information about an important topic, I didn't mean to nitpick

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Your new title says the school district's costs are 440% higher than private schools.

It should say "higher cost because of"
"higher cost over" implies "more, greater than"... It doesn't imply "higher because of"

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

It really wakes you up

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

"The texts were in response to seeing shoplifters at a CVS pharmacy on 10 August"

When he says "I wish they would come into my house", the word they refers to the shoplifters. When he says he will murder them he is still referring to the shoplifters.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The average inflation rate for the last 20 years is under 3%

Edit: why are people downvoting me, refute my statement with a source instead of downvoting because you wish inflation was higher

 
 
 
-71
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by workerONE@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
 

"leading aerodynamicist Doug McLean has attempted to go beyond sheer mathematical formalism and come to grips with the physical cause-and-effect relations that account for lift in all of its real-life manifestations. ... McLean’s complex explanation of lift starts with the basic assumption of all ordinary aerodynamics: the air around a wing acts as “a continuous material that deforms to follow the contours of the airfoil.” That deformation exists in the form of a deep swath of fluid flow both above and below the wing. “The airfoil affects the pressure over a wide area in what is called a pressure field,” McLean writes. “When lift is produced, a diffuse cloud of low pressure always forms above the airfoil, and a diffuse cloud of high pressure usually forms below. Where these clouds touch the airfoil they constitute the pressure difference that exerts lift on the airfoil.”

The wing pushes the air down, resulting in a downward turn of the airflow. The air above the wing is sped up in accordance with Bernoulli’s principle. In addition, there is an area of high pressure below the wing and a region of low pressure above. This means that there are four necessary components in McLean’s explanation of lift: a downward turning of the airflow, an increase in the airflow’s speed, an area of low pressure and an area of high pressure.

But it is the interrelation among these four elements that is the most novel and distinctive aspect of McLean’s account. “They support each other in a reciprocal cause-and-effect relationship, and none would exist without the others,” he writes. “The pressure differences exert the lift force on the airfoil, while the downward turning of the flow and the changes in flow speed sustain the pressure differences.” It is this interrelation that constitutes a fifth element of McLean’s explanation: the reciprocity among the other four. It is as if those four components collectively bring themselves into existence, and sustain themselves, by simultaneous acts of mutual creation and causation."

 
 
 
1648
Debate this! (lemmy.world)
 
 
 
view more: next ›